Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Leonidas Tsepenekas

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

8 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

8

AAAI Conference 2024 Conference Paper

SHAP@k: Efficient and Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) Identification of Top-K Features

  • Sanjay Kariyappa
  • Leonidas Tsepenekas
  • Freddy Lécué
  • Daniele Magazzeni

The SHAP framework provides a principled method to explain the predictions of a model by computing feature importance. Motivated by applications in finance, we introduce the Top-k Identification Problem (TkIP) (and its ordered variant TkIP- O), where the objective is to identify the subset (or ordered subset for TkIP-O) of k features corresponding to the highest SHAP values with PAC guarantees. While any sampling-based method that estimates SHAP values (such as KernelSHAP and SamplingSHAP) can be trivially adapted to solve TkIP, doing so is highly sample inefficient. Instead, we leverage the connection between SHAP values and multi-armed bandits (MAB) to show that both TkIP and TkIP-O can be reduced to variants of problems in MAB literature. This reduction allows us to use insights from the MAB literature to develop sample-efficient variants of KernelSHAP and SamplingSHAP. We propose KernelSHAP@k and SamplingSHAP@k for solving TkIP; along with KernelSHAP-O and SamplingSHAP-O to solve the ordering problem in TkIP-O. We perform extensive experiments using several credit-related datasets to show that our methods offer significant improvements of up to 40× in sample efficiency and 39× in runtime.

NeurIPS Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Comparing Apples to Oranges: Learning Similarity Functions for Data Produced by Different Distributions

  • Leonidas Tsepenekas
  • Ivan Brugere
  • Freddy Lecue
  • Daniele Magazzeni

Similarity functions measure how comparable pairs of elements are, and play a key role in a wide variety of applications, e. g. , notions of Individual Fairness abiding by the seminal paradigm of Dwork et al. , as well as Clustering problems. However, access to an accurate similarity function should not always be considered guaranteed, and this point was even raised by Dwork et al. For instance, it is reasonable to assume that when the elements to be compared are produced by different distributions, or in other words belong to different ``demographic'' groups, knowledge of their true similarity might be very difficult to obtain. In this work, we present an efficient sampling framework that learns these across-groups similarity functions, using only a limited amount of experts' feedback. We show analytical results with rigorous theoretical bounds, and empirically validate our algorithms via a large suite of experiments.

IJCAI Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Efficient and Equitable Deployment of Mobile Vaccine Distribution Centers

  • Da Qi Chen
  • Ann Li
  • George Z. Li
  • Madhav Marathe
  • Aravind Srinivasan
  • Leonidas Tsepenekas
  • Anil Vullikanti

Vaccines have proven to be extremely effective in preventing the spread of COVID-19 and potentially ending the pandemic. Lack of access caused many people not getting vaccinated early, so states such as Virginia deployed mobile vaccination sites in order to distribute vaccines across the state. Here we study the problem of deciding where these facilities should be placed and moved over time in order to minimize the distance each person needs to travel in order to be vaccinated. Traditional facility location models for this problem fail to incorporate the fact that our facilities are mobile (i. e. , they can move over time). To this end, we instead model vaccine distribution as the Dynamic k-Supplier problem and give the first approximation algorithms for this problem. We then run extensive simulations on real world datasets to show the efficacy of our methods. In particular, we find that natural baselines for Dynamic k-Supplier cannot take advantage of the mobility of the facilities, and perform worse than non-mobile k-Supplier algorithms.

AAMAS Conference 2022 Conference Paper

Deploying Vaccine Distribution Sites for Improved Accessibility and Equity to Support Pandemic Response

  • George Z. Li
  • Ann Li
  • Madhav Marathe
  • Aravind Srinivasan
  • Leonidas Tsepenekas
  • Anil Vullikanti

In response to COVID-19, many countries have mandated social distancing and banned large group gatherings in order to slow down the spread of SARS-CoV-2. These social interventions along with vaccines remain the best way forward to reduce the spread of SARS CoV-2. In order to increase vaccine accessibility, states such as Virginia have deployed mobile vaccination centers to distribute vaccines across the state. When choosing where to place these sites, there are two important factors to take into account: accessibility and equity. We formulate a combinatorial problem that captures these factors and then develop efficient algorithms with theoretical guarantees on both of these aspects. Furthermore, we study the inherent hardness of the problem, and demonstrate strong impossibility results. Finally, we run computational experiments on real-world data to show the efficacy of our methods.

AAAI Conference 2021 Conference Paper

Fairness, Semi-Supervised Learning, and More: A General Framework for Clustering with Stochastic Pairwise Constraints

  • Brian Brubach
  • Darshan Chakrabarti
  • John P. Dickerson
  • Aravind Srinivasan
  • Leonidas Tsepenekas

Metric clustering is fundamental in areas ranging from Combinatorial Optimization and Data Mining, to Machine Learning and Operations Research. However, in a variety of situations we may have additional requirements or knowledge, distinct from the underlying metric, regarding which pairs of points should be clustered together. To capture and analyze such scenarios, we introduce a novel family of stochastic pairwise constraints, which we incorporate into several essential clustering objectives (radius/median/means). Moreover, we demonstrate that these constraints can succinctly model an intriguing collection of applications, including among others Individual Fairness in clustering and Must-link constraints in semi-supervised learning. Our main result consists of a general framework that yields approximation algorithms with provable guarantees for important clustering objectives, while at the same time producing solutions that respect the stochastic pairwise constraints. Furthermore, for certain objectives we devise improved results in the case of Must-link constraints, which are also the best possible from a theoretical perspective. Finally, we present experimental evidence that validates the effectiveness of our algorithms.

ICML Conference 2020 Conference Paper

A Pairwise Fair and Community-preserving Approach to k-Center Clustering

  • Brian Brubach
  • Darshan Chakrabarti
  • John Dickerson 0001
  • Samir Khuller
  • Aravind Srinivasan
  • Leonidas Tsepenekas

Clustering is a foundational problem in machine learning with numerous applications. As machine learning increases in ubiquity as a backend for automated systems, concerns about fairness arise. Much of the current literature on fairness deals with discrimination against protected classes in supervised learning (group fairness). We define a different notion of fair clustering wherein the probability that two points (or a community of points) become separated is bounded by an increasing function of their pairwise distance (or community diameter). We capture the situation where data points represent people who gain some benefit from being clustered together. Unfairness arises when certain points are deterministically separated, either arbitrarily or by someone who intends to harm them as in the case of gerrymandering election districts. In response, we formally define two new types of fairness in the clustering setting, pairwise fairness and community preservation. To explore the practicality of our fairness goals, we devise an approach for extending existing $k$-center algorithms to satisfy these fairness constraints. Analysis of this approach proves that reasonable approximations can be achieved while maintaining fairness. In experiments, we compare the effectiveness of our approach to classical $k$-center algorithms/heuristics and explore the tradeoff between optimal clustering and fairness.

NeurIPS Conference 2020 Conference Paper

Probabilistic Fair Clustering

  • Seyed Esmaeili
  • Brian Brubach
  • Leonidas Tsepenekas
  • John Dickerson

In clustering problems, a central decision-maker is given a complete metric graph over vertices and must provide a clustering of vertices that minimizes some objective function. In fair clustering problems, vertices are endowed with a color (e. g. , membership in a group), and the requirements of a valid clustering might also include the representation of colors in the solution. Prior work in fair clustering assumes complete knowledge of group membership. In this paper, we generalize this by assuming imperfect knowledge of group membership through probabilistic assignments, and present algorithms in this more general setting with approximation ratio guarantees. We also address the problem of "metric membership", where group membership has a notion of order and distance. Experiments are conducted using our proposed algorithms as well as baselines to validate our approach, and also surface nuanced concerns when group membership is not known deterministically.

AAAI Conference 2019 Conference Paper

A Unified Approach to Online Matching with Conflict-Aware Constraints

  • Pan Xu
  • Yexuan Shi
  • Hao Cheng
  • John Dickerson
  • Karthik Abinav Sankararaman
  • Aravind Srinivasan
  • Yongxin Tong
  • Leonidas Tsepenekas

Online bipartite matching and allocation models are widely used to analyze and design markets such as Internet advertising, online labor, and crowdsourcing. Traditionally, vertices on one side of the market are fixed and known a priori, while vertices on the other side arrive online and are matched by a central agent to the offline side. The issue of possible conflicts among offline agents emerges in various real scenarios when we need to match each online agent with a set of offline agents. For example, in event-based social networks (e. g. , Meetup), offline events conflict for some users since they will be unable to attend mutually-distant events at proximate times; in advertising markets, two competing firms may prefer not to be shown to one user simultaneously; and in online recommendation systems (e. g. , Amazon Books), books of the same type “conflict” with each other in some sense due to the diversity requirement for each online buyer. The conflict nature inherent among certain offline agents raises significant challenges in both modeling and online algorithm design. In this paper, we propose a unifying model, generalizing the conflict models proposed in (She et al. , TKDE 2016) and (Chen et al. , TKDE 16). Our model can capture not only a broad class of conflict constraints on the offline side (which is even allowed to be sensitive to each online agent), but also allows a general arrival pattern for the online side (which is allowed to change over the online phase). We propose an efficient linear programming (LP) based online algorithm and prove theoretically that it has nearly-optimal online performance. Additionally, we propose two LP-based heuristics and test them against two natural baselines on both real and synthetic datasets. Our LP-based heuristics experimentally dominate the baseline algorithms, aligning with our theoretical predictions and supporting our unified approach.

v2026.09.13