Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Kyle O'Brien

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

5 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

5

TMLR Journal 2026 Journal Article

Open Technical Problems in Open-Weight AI Model Risk Management

  • Stephen Casper
  • Kyle O'Brien
  • Shayne Longpre
  • Elizabeth Seger
  • Kevin Klyman
  • Rishi Bommasani
  • Aniruddha Nrusimha
  • Ilia Shumailov

Frontier AI models with openly available weights are steadily becoming more powerful and widely adopted. However, compared to proprietary models, open-weight models pose different opportunities and challenges for effective risk management. For example, they allow for more open research and testing. However, managing their risks is also challenging because they can be modified arbitrarily, used without oversight, and spread irreversibly. Currently, there is limited research on safety tooling specific to open-weight models. Addressing these gaps will be key to both realizing their benefits and mitigating their harms. In this paper, we present 16 open technical challenges for open-weight model safety involving training data, training algorithms, evaluations, deployment, and ecosystem monitoring. We conclude by discussing the nascent state of the field, emphasizing that openness about research, methods, and evaluations -- not just weights -- will be key to building a rigorous science of open-weight model risk management.

ICLR Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Composable Interventions for Language Models

  • Arinbjörn Kolbeinsson
  • Kyle O'Brien
  • Tianjin Huang
  • Shanghua Gao
  • Shiwei Liu 0003
  • Jonathan Richard Schwarz
  • Anurag J. Vaidya
  • Faisal Mahmood 0001

Test-time interventions for language models can enhance factual accuracy, mitigate harmful outputs, and improve model efficiency without costly retraining. But despite a flood of new methods, different types of interventions are largely developing independently. In practice, multiple interventions must be applied sequentially to the same model, yet we lack standardized ways to study how interventions interact. We fill this gap by introducing composable interventions, a framework to study the effects of using multiple interventions on the same language models, featuring new metrics and a unified codebase. Using our framework, we conduct extensive experiments and compose popular methods from three emerging intervention categories---knowledge editing, model compression, and machine unlearning. Our results over 417 different compositions uncover meaningful interactions: compression hinders editing and unlearning, composing interventions hinges on their order of application, and popular general-purpose metrics are inadequate for assessing composability. Taken together, our findings showcase clear gaps in composability, suggesting a need for new multi-objective interventions.

ICLR Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Recite, Reconstruct, Recollect: Memorization in LMs as a Multifaceted Phenomenon

  • USVSN Sai Prashanth
  • Alvin Deng
  • Kyle O'Brien
  • Jyothir S. V
  • Mohammad Aflah Khan
  • Jaydeep Borkar
  • Christopher A. Choquette-Choo
  • Jacob Ray Fuehne

Memorization in language models is typically treated as a homogenous phenomenon, neglecting the specifics of the memorized data. We instead model memorization as the effect of a set of complex factors that describe each sample and relate it to the model and corpus. To build intuition around these factors, we break memorization down into a taxonomy: recitation of highly duplicated sequences, reconstruction of inherently predictable sequences, and recollection of sequences that are neither. We demonstrate the usefulness of our taxonomy by using it to construct a predictive model for memorization. By analyzing dependencies and inspecting the weights of the predictive model, we find that different factors have different influences on the likelihood of memorization depending on the taxonomic category.

TMLR Journal 2024 Journal Article

Improving Black-box Robustness with In-Context Rewriting

  • Kyle O'Brien
  • Nathan Hoyen Ng
  • Isha Puri
  • Jorge Mendez-Mendez
  • Hamid Palangi
  • Yoon Kim
  • Marzyeh Ghassemi
  • Thomas Hartvigsen

Machine learning models for text classification often excel on in-distribution (ID) data but struggle with unseen out-of-distribution (OOD) inputs. Most techniques for improving OOD robustness are not applicable to settings where the model is effectively a black box, such as when the weights are frozen, retraining is costly, or the model is leveraged via an API. Test-time augmentation (TTA) is a simple post-hoc technique for improving robustness that sidesteps black-box constraints by aggregating predictions across multiple augmentations of the test input. TTA has seen limited use in NLP due to the challenge of generating effective natural language augmentations. In this work, we propose LLM-TTA, which uses LLM-generated augmentations as TTA's augmentation function. LLM-TTA outperforms conventional augmentation functions across sentiment, toxicity, and news classification tasks for BERT and T5 models, with BERT's OOD robustness improving by an average of 4.48 percentage points without regressing average ID performance. We explore selectively augmenting inputs based on prediction entropy to reduce the rate of expensive LLM augmentations, allowing us to maintain performance gains while reducing the average number of generated augmentations by 57.74\%. LLM-TTA is agnostic to the task model architecture, does not require OOD labels, and is effective across low and high-resource settings.

ICML Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scaling

  • Stella Biderman
  • Hailey Schoelkopf
  • Quentin Gregory Anthony
  • Herbie Bradley
  • Kyle O'Brien
  • Eric Hallahan
  • Mohammad Aflah Khan
  • Shivanshu Purohit

How do large language models (LLMs) develop and evolve over the course of training? How do these patterns change as models scale? To answer these questions, we introduce Pythia, a suite of 16 LLMs all trained on public data seen in the exact same order and ranging in size from 70M to 12B parameters. We provide public access to 154 checkpoints for each one of the 16 models, alongside tools to download and reconstruct their exact training dataloaders for further study. We intend Pythia to facilitate research in many areas, and we present several case studies including novel results in memorization, term frequency effects on few-shot performance, and reducing gender bias. We demonstrate that this highly controlled setup can be used to yield novel insights toward LLMs and their training dynamics. Trained models, analysis code, training code, and training data can be found at https: //github. com/EleutherAI/pythia.

v2026.09.13