Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Kevin Jamieson

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

20 papers
1 author row

Possible papers

20

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Adapting to Stochastic and Adversarial Losses in Episodic MDPs with Aggregate Bandit Feedback

  • Shinji Ito
  • Kevin Jamieson
  • Haipeng Luo
  • Arnab Maiti
  • Taira Tsuchiya

We study online learning in finite-horizon episodic Markov decision processes (MDPs) under the challenging \textit{aggregate bandit feedback} model, where the learner observes only the cumulative loss incurred in each episode, rather than individual losses at each state-action pair. While prior work in this setting has focused exclusively on worst-case analysis, we initiate the study of \textit{best-of-both-worlds} (BOBW) algorithms that achieve low regret in both stochastic and adversarial environments. We propose the first BOBW algorithms for episodic tabular MDPs with aggregate bandit feedback. In the case of known transitions, our algorithms achieve $O(\log T)$ regret in stochastic settings and ${O}(\sqrt{T})$ regret in adversarial ones. Importantly, we also establish matching lower bounds, showing the optimality of our algorithms in this setting. We further extend our approach to unknown-transition settings by incorporating confidence-based techniques. Our results rely on a combination of FTRL over occupancy measures, self-bounding techniques, and new loss estimators inspired by recent advances in online shortest path problems. Along the way, we also provide the first individual-gap-dependent lower bounds and demonstrate near-optimal BOBW algorithms for shortest path problems with bandit feedback.

PDF Details

EWRL Workshop 2025 Workshop Paper

High Effort, Low Gain: Fundamental Limits of Active Learning for Linear Dynamical Systems

  • Nicolas Chatzikiriakos
  • Kevin Jamieson
  • Andrea Iannelli

In this work, we consider the problem of identifying an unknown linear dynamical system given a finite hypothesis class. In particular, we analyze the effect of the excitation input on the sample complexity of identifying the true system with high probability. To this end, we present sample complexity lower bounds that capture the choice of the selected excitation input. The sample complexity lower bound gives rise to a system theoretic condition to determine the potential benefit of experiment design. Informed by the analysis of the sample complexity lower bound, we propose a persistent excitation (PE) condition tailored to the considered setting, which we then use to establish sample complexity upper bounds. Notably, the PE condition is weaker than in the case of an infinite hypothesis class and allows analyzing different excitation inputs modularly. Crucially, the lower and upper bounds share the same dependency on key problem parameters. Finally, we leverage these insights to propose an active learning algorithm that sequentially excites the system optimally with respect to the current estimate, and provide sample complexity guarantees for the presented algorithm. Concluding simulations showcase the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.

PDF

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

On the Universal Near Optimality of Hedge in Combinatorial Settings

  • Zhiyuan Fan
  • Arnab Maiti
  • Lillian Ratliff
  • Kevin Jamieson
  • Gabriele Farina

In this paper, we study the classical Hedge algorithm in combinatorial settings. In each round, the learner selects a vector $\mathbf{x}_t$ from a set $\mathcal{X} \subseteq$ {$0, 1$}$^d$, observes a full loss vector $\mathbf{y}_t \in \mathbb{R}^d$, and incurs a loss $\langle \mathbf{x}_t, \mathbf{y}_t \rangle \in [-1, 1]$. This setting captures several important problems, including extensive-form games, resource allocation, $m$-sets, online multitask learning, and shortest-path problems on directed acyclic graphs (DAGs). It is well known that Hedge achieves a regret of $\mathcal{O}\big(\sqrt{T \log |\mathcal{X}|}\big)$ after $T$ rounds of interaction. In this paper, we ask whether Hedge is optimal across all combinatorial settings. To that end, we show that for any $\mathcal{X} \subseteq$ {$0, 1$}$^d$, Hedge is near-optimal—specifically, up to a $\sqrt{\log d}$ factor—by establishing a lower bound of $\Omega\big(\sqrt{T \log(|\mathcal{X}|)/\log d}\big)$ that holds for any algorithm. We then identify a natural class of combinatorial sets—namely, $m$-sets with $\log d \leq m \leq \sqrt{d}$—for which this lower bound is tight, and for which Hedge is provably suboptimal by a factor of exactly $\sqrt{\log d}$. At the same time, we show that Hedge is optimal for online multitask learning, a generalization of the classical $K$-experts problem. Finally, we leverage the near-optimality of Hedge to establish the existence of a near-optimal regularizer for online shortest-path problems in DAGs—a setting that subsumes a broad range of combinatorial domains. Specifically, we show that the classical Online Mirror Descent (OMD) algorithm, when instantiated with the dilated entropy regularizer, is iterate-equivalent to Hedge, and therefore inherits its near-optimal regret guarantees for DAGs.

PDF Details

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Active learning of neural population dynamics using two-photon holographic optogenetics

  • Andrew Wagenmaker
  • Lu Mi
  • Marton Rozsa
  • Matthew S. Bull
  • Karel Svoboda
  • Kayvon Daie
  • Matthew D. Golub
  • Kevin Jamieson

Recent advances in techniques for monitoring and perturbing neural populations have greatly enhanced our ability to study circuits in the brain. In particular, two-photon holographic optogenetics now enables precise photostimulation of experimenter-specified groups of individual neurons, while simultaneous two-photon calcium imaging enables the measurement of ongoing and induced activity across the neural population. Despite the enormous space of potential photostimulation patterns and the time-consuming nature of photostimulation experiments, very little algorithmic work has been done to determine the most effective photostimulation patterns for identifying the neural population dynamics. Here, we develop methods to efficiently select which neurons to stimulate such that the resulting neural responses will best inform a dynamical model of the neural population activity. Using neural population responses to photostimulation in mouse motor cortex, we demonstrate the efficacy of a low-rank linear dynamical systems model, and develop an active learning procedure which takes advantage of low-rank structure to determine informative photostimulation patterns. We demonstrate our approach on both real and synthetic data, obtaining in some cases as much as a two-fold reduction in the amount of data required to reach a given predictive power. Our active stimulation design method is based on a novel active learning procedure for low-rank regression, which may be of independent interest.

PDF Details DOI

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

CLIPLoss and Norm-Based Data Selection Methods for Multimodal Contrastive Learning

  • Yiping Wang
  • Yifang Chen
  • Wendan Yan
  • Alex Fang
  • Wenjing Zhou
  • Kevin Jamieson
  • Simon S. Du

Data selection has emerged as a core issue for large-scale visual-language model pretaining (e. g. , CLIP), particularly with noisy web-curated datasets. Three main data selection approaches are: (1) leveraging external non-CLIP models to aid data selection, (2) training new CLIP-style embedding models that are more effective at selecting high-quality data than the original OpenAI CLIP model, and (3) designing better metrics or strategies universally applicable to any CLIP embedding without requiring specific model properties (e. g. , CLIPScore is one popular metric). While the first two approaches have been extensively studied, the third remains under-explored. In this paper, we advance the third approach by proposing two new methods. Firstly, instead of classical CLIP scores that only consider the alignment between two modalities from a single sample, we introduce $\textbf{negCLIPLoss}$, a method inspired by CLIP training loss that adds the alignment between one sample and its contrastive pairs as an extra normalization term to CLIPScore for better quality measurement. Secondly, when downstream tasks are known, we propose a new norm-based metric, $\textbf{NormSim}$, to measure the similarity between pretraining data and target data. We test our methods on the data selection benchmark, DataComp [Gadre et al. , 2023]. Compared to the best baseline using only OpenAI's CLIP-L/14, our methods achieve a 5. 3\% improvement on ImageNet-1k and a 2. 8\% improvement on 38 downstream evaluation tasks. Moreover, both $\textbf{negCLIPLoss}$ and $\textbf{NormSim}$ are compatible with existing techniques. By combining our methods with the current best methods DFN [Fang et al. , 2023] and HYPE [Kim et al. , 2024], we can boost average performance on downstream tasks by 0. 9\%, achieving a new state-of-the-art on the DataComp-medium benchmark.

PDF Details DOI

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Humor in AI: Massive Scale Crowd-Sourced Preferences and Benchmarks for Cartoon Captioning

  • Jifan Zhang
  • Lalit Jain
  • Yang Guo
  • Jiayi Chen
  • Kuan L. Zhou
  • Siddharth Suresh
  • Andrew Wagenmaker
  • Scott Sievert

We present a novel multimodal preference dataset for creative tasks, consisting of over 250 million human votes on more than 2. 2 million captions, collected through crowdsourcing rating data for The New Yorker's weekly cartoon caption contest over the past eight years. This unique dataset supports the development and evaluation of multimodal large language models and preference-based fine-tuning algorithms for humorous caption generation. We propose novel benchmarks for judging the quality of model-generated captions, utilizing both GPT4 and human judgments to establish ranking-based evaluation strategies. Our experimental results highlight the limitations of current fine-tuning methods, such as RLHF and DPO, when applied to creative tasks. Furthermore, we demonstrate that even state-of-the-art models like GPT4 and Claude currently underperform top human contestants in generating humorous captions. As we conclude this extensive data collection effort, we release the entire preference dataset to the research community, fostering further advancements in AI humor generation and evaluation.

PDF Details DOI

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Nearly Minimax Optimal Submodular Maximization with Bandit Feedback

  • Artin Tajdini
  • Lalit Jain
  • Kevin Jamieson

We consider maximizing an unknown monotonic, submodular set function $f: 2^{[n]} \rightarrow [0, 1]$ with cardinality constraint under stochastic bandit feedback. At each time $t=1, \dots, T$ the learner chooses a set $S_t \subset [n]$ with $|S_t| \leq k$ and receives reward $f(S_t) + \eta_t$ where $\eta_t$ is mean-zero sub-Gaussian noise. The objective is to minimize the learner's regret with respect to an approximation of the maximum $f(S_*)$ with $|S_*| = k$, obtained through robust greedy maximization of $f$. To date, the best regret bound in the literature scales as $k n^{1/3} T^{2/3}$. And by trivially treating every set as a unique arm one deduces that $\sqrt{ {n \choose k} T }$ is also achievable using standard multi-armed bandit algorithms. In this work, we establish the first minimax lower bound for this setting that scales like $\tilde{\Omega}(\min_{L \le k}(L^{1/3}n^{1/3}T^{2/3} + \sqrt{{n \choose k - L}T}))$. For a slightly restricted algorithm class, we prove a stronger regret lower bound of $\tilde{\Omega}(\min_{L \le k}(Ln^{1/3}T^{2/3} + \sqrt{{n \choose k - L}T}))$. Moreover, we propose an algorithm Sub-UCB that achieves regret $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\min_{L \le k}(Ln^{1/3}T^{2/3} + \sqrt{{n \choose k - L}T}))$ capable of matching the lower bound on regret for the restricted class up to logarithmic factors.

PDF Details DOI

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Overcoming the Sim-to-Real Gap: Leveraging Simulation to Learn to Explore for Real-World RL

  • Andrew Wagenmaker
  • Kevin Huang
  • Liyiming Ke
  • Kevin Jamieson
  • Abhishek Gupta

In order to mitigate the sample complexity of real-world reinforcement learning, common practice is to first train a policy in a simulator where samples are cheap, and then deploy this policy in the real world, with the hope that it generalizes effectively. Such \emph{direct sim2real} transfer is not guaranteed to succeed, however, and in cases where it fails, it is unclear how to best utilize the simulator. In this work, we show that in many regimes, while direct sim2real transfer may fail, we can utilize the simulator to learn a set of \emph{exploratory} policies which enable efficient exploration in the real world. In particular, in the setting of low-rank MDPs, we show that coupling these exploratory policies with simple, practical approaches---least-squares regression oracles and naive randomized exploration---yields a polynomial sample complexity in the real world, an exponential improvement over direct sim2real transfer, or learning without access to a simulator. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first evidence that simulation transfer yields a provable gain in reinforcement learning in settings where direct sim2real transfer fails. We validate our theoretical results on several realistic robotic simulators and a real-world robotic sim2real task, demonstrating that transferring exploratory policies can yield substantial gains in practice as well.

PDF Details DOI

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Sample Complexity Reduction via Policy Difference Estimation in Tabular Reinforcement Learning

  • Adhyyan Narang
  • Andrew Wagenmaker
  • Lillian J. Ratliff
  • Kevin Jamieson

In this paper, we study the non-asymptotic sample complexity for the pure exploration problem in contextual bandits and tabular reinforcement learning (RL): identifying an $\epsilon$-optimal policy from a set of policies $\Pi$ with high probability. Existing work in bandits has shown that it is possible to identify the best policy by estimating only the *difference* between the behaviors of individual policies–which can have substantially lower variance than estimating the behavior of each policy directly—yet the best-known complexities in RL fail to take advantage of this, and instead estimate the behavior of each policy directly. Does it suffice to estimate only the differences in the behaviors of policies in RL? We answer this question positively for contextual bandits, but in the negative for tabular RL, showing a separation between contextual bandits and RL. However, inspired by this, we show that it *almost* suffices to estimate only the differences in RL: if we can estimate the behavior of a *single* reference policy, it suffices to only estimate how any other policy deviates from this reference policy. We develop an algorithm which instantiates this principle and obtains, to the best of our knowledge, the tightest known bound on the sample complexity of tabular RL.

PDF Details DOI

NeurIPS Conference 2019 Conference Paper

A New Perspective on Pool-Based Active Classification and False-Discovery Control

  • Lalit Jain
  • Kevin Jamieson

In many scientific settings there is a need for adaptive experimental design to guide the process of identifying regions of the search space that contain as many true positives as possible subject to a low rate of false discoveries (i. e. false alarms). Such regions of the search space could differ drastically from a predicted set that minimizes 0/1 error and accurate identification could require very different sampling strategies. Like active learning for binary classification, this experimental design cannot be optimally chosen a priori, but rather the data must be taken sequentially and adaptively in a closed loop. However, unlike classification with 0/1 error, collecting data adaptively to find a set with high true positive rate and low false discovery rate (FDR) is not as well understood. In this paper, we provide the first provably sample efficient adaptive algorithm for this problem. Along the way, we highlight connections between classification, combinatorial bandits, and FDR control making contributions to each.

PDF Details

NeurIPS Conference 2019 Conference Paper

Non-Asymptotic Gap-Dependent Regret Bounds for Tabular MDPs

  • Max Simchowitz
  • Kevin Jamieson

This paper establishes that optimistic algorithms attain gap-dependent and non-asymptotic logarithmic regret for episodic MDPs. In contrast to prior work, our bounds do not suffer a dependence on diameter-like quantities or ergodicity, and smoothly interpolate between the gap dependent logarithmic-regret, and the $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{HSAT})$-minimax rate. The key technique in our analysis is a novel ``clipped'' regret decomposition which applies to a broad family of recent optimistic algorithms for episodic MDPs.

PDF Details

NeurIPS Conference 2019 Conference Paper

Sequential Experimental Design for Transductive Linear Bandits

  • Tanner Fiez
  • Lalit Jain
  • Kevin Jamieson
  • Lillian Ratliff

In this paper we introduce the pure exploration transductive linear bandit problem: given a set of measurement vectors $\mathcal{X}\subset \mathbb{R}^d$, a set of items $\mathcal{Z}\subset \mathbb{R}^d$, a fixed confidence $\delta$, and an unknown vector $\theta^{\ast}\in \mathbb{R}^d$, the goal is to infer $\arg\max_{z\in \mathcal{Z}} z^\top\theta^\ast$ with probability $1-\delta$ by making as few sequentially chosen noisy measurements of the form $x^\top\theta^{\ast}$ as possible. When $\mathcal{X}=\mathcal{Z}$, this setting generalizes linear bandits, and when $\mathcal{X}$ is the standard basis vectors and $\mathcal{Z}\subset \{0, 1\}^d$, combinatorial bandits. The transductive setting naturally arises when the set of measurement vectors is limited due to factors such as availability or cost. As an example, in drug discovery the compounds and dosages $\mathcal{X}$ a practitioner may be willing to evaluate in the lab in vitro due to cost or safety reasons may differ vastly from those compounds and dosages $\mathcal{Z}$ that can be safely administered to patients in vivo. Alternatively, in recommender systems for books, the set of books $\mathcal{X}$ a user is queried about may be restricted to known best-sellers even though the goal might be to recommend more esoteric titles $\mathcal{Z}$. In this paper, we provide instance-dependent lower bounds for the transductive setting, an algorithm that matches these up to logarithmic factors, and an evaluation. In particular, we present the first non-asymptotic algorithm for linear bandits that nearly achieves the information-theoretic lower bound.

PDF Details

NeurIPS Conference 2018 Conference Paper

A Bandit Approach to Sequential Experimental Design with False Discovery Control

  • Kevin Jamieson
  • Lalit Jain

We propose a new adaptive sampling approach to multiple testing which aims to maximize statistical power while ensuring anytime false discovery control. We consider $n$ distributions whose means are partitioned by whether they are below or equal to a baseline (nulls), versus above the baseline (true positives). In addition, each distribution can be sequentially and repeatedly sampled. Using techniques from multi-armed bandits, we provide an algorithm that takes as few samples as possible to exceed a target true positive proportion (i. e. proportion of true positives discovered) while giving anytime control of the false discovery proportion (nulls predicted as true positives). Our sample complexity results match known information theoretic lower bounds and through simulations we show a substantial performance improvement over uniform sampling and an adaptive elimination style algorithm. Given the simplicity of the approach, and its sample efficiency, the method has promise for wide adoption in the biological sciences, clinical testing for drug discovery, and maximization of click through in A/B/n testing problems.

PDF Details

JMLR Journal 2018 Journal Article

Hyperband: A Novel Bandit-Based Approach to Hyperparameter Optimization

  • Lisha Li
  • Kevin Jamieson
  • Giulia DeSalvo
  • Afshin Rostamizadeh
  • Ameet Talwalkar

Performance of machine learning algorithms depends critically on identifying a good set of hyperparameters. While recent approaches use Bayesian optimization to adaptively select configurations, we focus on speeding up random search through adaptive resource allocation and early-stopping. We formulate hyperparameter optimization as a pure-exploration non-stochastic infinite-armed bandit problem where a predefined resource like iterations, data samples, or features is allocated to randomly sampled configurations. We introduce a novel algorithm, øuralg, for this framework and analyze its theoretical properties, providing several desirable guarantees. Furthermore, we compare øuralg with popular Bayesian optimization methods on a suite of hyperparameter optimization problems. We observe that øuralg can provide over an order-of-magnitude speedup over our competitor set on a variety of deep-learning and kernel-based learning problems. [abs] [ pdf ][ bib ] &copy JMLR 2018. ( edit, beta )

PDF Details

NeurIPS Conference 2017 Conference Paper

A framework for Multi-A(rmed)/B(andit) Testing with Online FDR Control

  • Fanny Yang
  • Aaditya Ramdas
  • Kevin Jamieson
  • Martin Wainwright

We propose an alternative framework to existing setups for controlling false alarms when multiple A/B tests are run over time. This setup arises in many practical applications, e. g. when pharmaceutical companies test new treatment options against control pills for different diseases, or when internet companies test their default webpages versus various alternatives over time. Our framework proposes to replace a sequence of A/B tests by a sequence of best-arm MAB instances, which can be continuously monitored by the data scientist. When interleaving the MAB tests with an online false discovery rate (FDR) algorithm, we can obtain the best of both worlds: low sample complexity and any time online FDR control. Our main contributions are: (i) to propose reasonable definitions of a null hypothesis for MAB instances; (ii) to demonstrate how one can derive an always-valid sequential p-value that allows continuous monitoring of each MAB test; and (iii) to show that using rejection thresholds of online-FDR algorithms as the confidence levels for the MAB algorithms results in both sample-optimality, high power and low FDR at any point in time. We run extensive simulations to verify our claims, and also report results on real data collected from the New Yorker Cartoon Caption contest.

PDF Details

NeurIPS Conference 2016 Conference Paper

Finite Sample Prediction and Recovery Bounds for Ordinal Embedding

  • Lalit Jain
  • Kevin Jamieson
  • Rob Nowak

The goal of ordinal embedding is to represent items as points in a low-dimensional Euclidean space given a set of constraints like ``item $i$ is closer to item $j$ than item $k$''. Ordinal constraints like this often come from human judgments. The classic approach to solving this problem is known as non-metric multidimensional scaling. To account for errors and variation in judgments, we consider the noisy situation in which the given constraints are independently corrupted by reversing the correct constraint with some probability. The ordinal embedding problem has been studied for decades, but most past work pays little attention to the question of whether accurate embedding is possible, apart from empirical studies. This paper shows that under a generative data model it is possible to learn the correct embedding from noisy distance comparisons. In establishing this fundamental result, the paper makes several new contributions. First, we derive prediction error bounds for embedding from noisy distance comparisons by exploiting the fact that the rank of a distance matrix of points in $\R^d$ is at most $d+2$. These bounds characterize how well a learned embedding predicts new comparative judgments. Second, we show that the underlying embedding can be recovered by solving a simple convex optimization. This result is highly non-trivial since we show that the linear map corresponding to distance comparisons is non-invertible, but there exists a nonlinear map that is invertible. Third, two new algorithms for ordinal embedding are proposed and evaluated in experiments.

PDF Details

NeurIPS Conference 2016 Conference Paper

The Power of Adaptivity in Identifying Statistical Alternatives

  • Kevin Jamieson
  • Daniel Haas
  • Benjamin Recht

This paper studies the trade-off between two different kinds of pure exploration: breadth versus depth. We focus on the most biased coin problem, asking how many total coin flips are required to identify a ``heavy'' coin from an infinite bag containing both ``heavy'' coins with mean $\theta_1 \in (0, 1)$, and ``light" coins with mean $\theta_0 \in (0, \theta_1)$, where heavy coins are drawn from the bag with proportion $\alpha \in (0, 1/2)$. When $\alpha, \theta_0, \theta_1$ are unknown, the key difficulty of this problem lies in distinguishing whether the two kinds of coins have very similar means, or whether heavy coins are just extremely rare. While existing solutions to this problem require some prior knowledge of the parameters $\theta_0, \theta_1, \alpha$, we propose an adaptive algorithm that requires no such knowledge yet still obtains near-optimal sample complexity guarantees. In contrast, we provide a lower bound showing that non-adaptive strategies require at least quadratically more samples. In characterizing this gap between adaptive and nonadaptive strategies, we make connections to anomaly detection and prove lower bounds on the sample complexity of differentiating between a single parametric distribution and a mixture of two such distributions.

PDF Details

NeurIPS Conference 2015 Conference Paper

NEXT: A System for Real-World Development, Evaluation, and Application of Active Learning

  • Kevin Jamieson
  • Lalit Jain
  • Chris Fernandez
  • Nicholas Glattard
  • Rob Nowak

Active learning methods automatically adapt data collection by selecting the most informative samples in order to accelerate machine learning. Because of this, real-world testing and comparing active learning algorithms requires collecting new datasets (adaptively), rather than simply applying algorithms to benchmark datasets, as is the norm in (passive) machine learning research. To facilitate the development, testing and deployment of active learning for real applications, we have built an open-source software system for large-scale active learning research and experimentation. The system, called NEXT, provides a unique platform for real-world, reproducible active learning research. This paper details the challenges of building the system and demonstrates its capabilities with several experiments. The results show how experimentation can help expose strengths and weaknesses of active learning algorithms, in sometimes unexpected and enlightening ways.

PDF Details

NeurIPS Conference 2012 Conference Paper

Query Complexity of Derivative-Free Optimization

  • Kevin Jamieson
  • Robert Nowak
  • Ben Recht

Derivative Free Optimization (DFO) is attractive when the objective function's derivatives are not available and evaluations are costly. Moreover, if the function evaluations are noisy, then approximating gradients by finite differences is difficult. This paper gives quantitative lower bounds on the performance of DFO with noisy function evaluations, exposing a fundamental and unavoidable gap between optimization performance based on noisy evaluations versus noisy gradients. This challenges the conventional wisdom that the method of finite differences is comparable to a stochastic gradient. However, there are situations in which DFO is unavoidable, and for such situations we propose a new DFO algorithm that is proved to be near optimal for the class of strongly convex objective functions. A distinctive feature of the algorithm is that it only uses Boolean-valued function comparisons, rather than evaluations. This makes the algorithm useful in an even wider range of applications, including optimization based on paired comparisons from human subjects, for example. Remarkably, we show that regardless of whether DFO is based on noisy function evaluations or Boolean-valued function comparisons, the convergence rate is the same.

PDF Details

NeurIPS Conference 2011 Conference Paper

Active Ranking using Pairwise Comparisons

  • Kevin Jamieson
  • Robert Nowak

This paper examines the problem of ranking a collection of objects using pairwise comparisons (rankings of two objects). In general, the ranking of $n$ objects can be identified by standard sorting methods using $n\log_2 n$ pairwise comparisons. We are interested in natural situations in which relationships among the objects may allow for ranking using far fewer pairwise comparisons. {Specifically, we assume that the objects can be embedded into a $d$-dimensional Euclidean space and that the rankings reflect their relative distances from a common reference point in $\R^d$. We show that under this assumption the number of possible rankings grows like $n^{2d}$ and demonstrate an algorithm that can identify a randomly selected ranking using just slightly more than $d\log n$ adaptively selected pairwise comparisons, on average. } If instead the comparisons are chosen at random, then almost all pairwise comparisons must be made in order to identify any ranking. In addition, we propose a robust, error-tolerant algorithm that only requires that the pairwise comparisons are probably correct. Experimental studies with synthetic and real datasets support the conclusions of our theoretical analysis.

PDF Details
v2026.09.13