Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Keming Lu

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

3 papers
1 author row

Possible papers

3

ICML Conference 2025 Conference Paper

MARGE: Improving Math Reasoning with Guided Exploration

  • Jingyue Gao
  • Runji Lin
  • Keming Lu
  • Bowen Yu 0002
  • Junyang Lin
  • Jianyu Chen 0002

Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit strong potential in mathematical reasoning, yet their effectiveness is often limited by a shortage of high-quality queries. This limitation necessitates scaling up computational responses through self-generated data, yet current methods struggle due to spurious correlated data caused by ineffective exploration across all reasoning stages. To address such challenge, we introduce MARGE: Improving Ma th R easoning with G uided E xploration, a novel method that enhances mathematical reasoning through hit-guided exploration. MARGE systematically explores intermediate reasoning states derived from self-generated solutions, enabling adequate exploration and improved credit assignment throughout the reasoning process. Notably, MARGE improves both single-shot accuracy and exploration diversity, mitigating a common trade-off in alignment methods. These results demonstrate MARGE’s effectiveness in enhancing mathematical reasoning capabilities and unlocking the potential of scaling self-generated training data.

ICLR Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Self-play with Execution Feedback: Improving Instruction-following Capabilities of Large Language Models

  • Guanting Dong 0001
  • Keming Lu
  • Chengpeng Li 0001
  • Tingyu Xia
  • Bowen Yu 0002
  • Chang Zhou 0005
  • Jingren Zhou 0001

One core capability of large language models~(LLMs) is to follow natural language instructions. However, the issue of automatically constructing high-quality training data to enhance the complex instruction-following abilities of LLMs without manual annotation remains unresolved. In this paper, we introduce AutoIF, the first scalable and reliable method for automatically generating instruction-following training data. AutoIF transforms the validation of instruction-following data quality into code verification, requiring LLMs to generate instructions, the corresponding code to verify the correctness of the instruction responses, and unit test samples to cross-validate the code's correctness. Then, execution feedback-based rejection sampling can generate data for Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) training. AutoIF achieves significant improvements across three training algorithms, SFT, Offline DPO, and Online DPO, when applied to the advanced open-source LLMs, Qwen2 and LLaMA3, in self-alignment and strong-to-weak distillation settings. Using two widely-used and three challenging general instruction-following benchmarks, we demonstrate that AutoIF significantly improves LLM performance across a wide range of natural instruction constraints. Notably, AutoIF is the first to surpass 90\% accuracy in IFEval’s loose instruction accuracy, without compromising general, math and coding capabilities. Further analysis of quality, scaling, combination, and data efficiency highlights AutoIF's strong generalization and alignment potential. Our code are available at https://github.com/QwenLM/AutoIF

ICLR Conference 2024 Conference Paper

#InsTag: Instruction Tagging for Analyzing Supervised Fine-tuning of Large Language Models

  • Keming Lu
  • Hongyi Yuan
  • Zheng Yuan 0002
  • Runji Lin
  • Junyang Lin
  • Chuanqi Tan
  • Chang Zhou 0005
  • Jingren Zhou 0001

Pre-trained large language models (LLMs) can understand and align with human instructions by supervised fine-tuning (SFT). It is commonly believed that diverse and complex SFT data are of the essence to enable good instruction-following abilities. However, such diversity and complexity are obscure and lack quantitative analyses. In this work, we propose InsTag, an open-set instruction tagging method, to identify semantics and intentions of human instructions by tags that provide access to definitions and quantified analyses of instruction diversity and complexity. We obtain 6.6K fine-grained tags to describe instructions from popular open-sourced SFT datasets comprehensively. We find that the abilities of aligned LLMs benefit from more diverse and complex instructions in SFT data. Based on this observation, we propose a data sampling procedure based on InsTag, and select 6K diverse and complex samples from open-source datasets for SFT. The resulting models, TagLM, outperform open-source models based on considerably larger SFT data evaluated by MT-Bench, echoing the importance of instruction diversity and complexity and the effectiveness of InsTag. InsTag has robust potential to be extended to more applications beyond the data selection as it provides an effective way to analyze the distribution of instructions.

v2026.09.13