Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Juntao Dai

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

11 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

11

AAAI Conference 2026 Conference Paper

What, Whether and How? Unveiling Process Reward Models for Thinking with Images Reasoning

  • Yujin Zhou
  • Pengcheng Wen
  • Jiale Chen
  • Boqin Yin
  • Han Zhu
  • Jiaming Ji
  • Juntao Dai
  • Chi-Min Chan

The rapid advancement of Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) has demonstrated excellent abilities in various visual tasks. Building upon these developments, the thinking with images paradigm has emerged, enabling models to dynamically edit and re-encode visual information at each reasoning step, mirroring human visual processing. However, this paradigm introduces significant challenges as diverse errors may occur during reasoning processes. This necessitates Process Reward Models (PRMs) for distinguishing positive and negative reasoning steps, yet existing benchmarks for PRMs are predominantly text-centric and lack comprehensive assessment under this paradigm. To address these gaps, this work introduces the first comprehensive benchmark specifically designed for evaluating PRMs under the thinking with images paradigm. Our main contributions are: (1) Through extensive analysis of reasoning trajectories and guided search experiments with PRMs, we define 7 fine-grained error types and demonstrate both the necessity for specialized PRMs and the potential for improvement. (2) We construct a comprehensive benchmark comprising 1,206 manually annotated thinking with images reasoning trajectories spanning 4 categories and 16 subcategories for fine-grained evaluation of PRMs. (3) Our experimental analysis reveals that current LVLMs fall short as effective PRMs, exhibiting limited capabilities in visual reasoning process evaluation with significant performance disparities across error types, positive evaluation bias, and sensitivity to reasoning step positions. These findings demonstrate the effectiveness of our benchmark and establish crucial foundations for advancing PRMs in LVLMs.

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

InterMT: Multi-Turn Interleaved Preference Alignment with Human Feedback

  • Boyuan Chen
  • Donghai Hong
  • Jiaming Ji
  • Jiacheng Zheng
  • Bowen Dong
  • Jiayi Zhou
  • Kaile Wang
  • Juntao Dai

As multimodal large models (MLLMs) continue to advance across challenging tasks, a key question emerges: \textbf{\textit{What essential capabilities are still missing? }}A critical aspect of human learning is continuous interaction with the environment -- not limited to language, but also involving multimodal understanding and generation. To move closer to human-level intelligence, models must similarly support \textbf{multi-turn}, \textbf{multimodal interaction}. In particular, they should comprehend interleaved multimodal contexts and respond coherently in ongoing exchanges. In this work, we present \textbf{an initial exploration} through the \textsc{InterMT} -- \textbf{the first preference dataset for \textit{multi-turn} multimodal interaction}, grounded in real human feedback. In this exploration, we particularly emphasize the importance of human oversight, introducing expert annotations to guide the process, motivated by the fact that current MLLMs lack such complex interactive capabilities. \textsc{InterMT} captures human preferences at both global and local levels into nine sub-dimensions, consists of 15. 6k prompts, 52. 6k multi-turn dialogue instances, and 32. 4k human-labeled preference pairs. To compensate for the lack of capability for multi-modal understanding and generation, we introduce an agentic workflow that leverages tool-augmented MLLMs to construct multi-turn QA instances. To further this goal, we introduce \textsc{InterMT-Bench} to assess the ability ofMLLMs in assisting judges with multi-turn, multimodal tasks. We demonstrate the utility of \textsc{InterMT} through applications such as judge moderation and further reveal the \textit{multi-turn scaling law} of judge model. We hope the open-source of our data can help facilitate further research on aligning current MLLMs to the next step.

ICLR Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Mitigating Reward Over-Optimization in RLHF via Behavior-Supported Regularization

  • Juntao Dai
  • Taiye Chen
  • Yaodong Yang 0001
  • Qian Zheng
  • Gang Pan 0001

Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) is an effective method for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human values. However, reward over-optimization remains an open challenge leading to discrepancies between the performance of LLMs under the reward model and the true human objectives. A primary contributor to reward over-optimization is the extrapolation error that arises when the reward model evaluates out-of-distribution (OOD) responses. However, current methods still fail to prevent the increasing frequency of OOD response generation during the reinforcement learning (RL) process and are not effective at handling extrapolation errors from OOD responses. In this work, we propose the *Behavior-Supported Policy Optimization* (BSPO) method to mitigate the reward over-optimization issue. Specifically, we define *behavior policy* as the next token distribution of the reward training dataset to model the in-distribution (ID) region of the reward model. Building on this, we introduce the behavior-supported Bellman operator to regularize the value function, penalizing all OOD values without impacting the ID ones. Consequently, BSPO reduces the generation of OOD responses during the RL process, thereby avoiding overestimation caused by the reward model’s extrapolation errors. Theoretically, we prove that BSPO guarantees a monotonic improvement of the supported policy until convergence to the optimal behavior-supported policy. Empirical results from extensive experiments show that BSPO outperforms baselines in preventing reward over-optimization due to OOD evaluation and finding the optimal ID policy.

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Safe RLHF-V: Safe Reinforcement Learning from Multi-modal Human Feedback

  • Jiaming Ji
  • Xinyu Chen
  • Rui Pan
  • Han Zhu
  • Jiahao Li
  • Donghai Hong
  • Boyuan Chen
  • Jiayi Zhou

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are essential for building general-purpose AI assistants; however, they pose increasing safety risks. How can we ensure safety alignment of MLLMs to prevent undesired behaviors? Going further, it is critical to explore how to fine-tune MLLMs to preserve capabilities while meeting safety constraints. Fundamentally, this challenge can be formulated as a min-max optimization problem. However, existing datasets have not yet disentangled single preference signals into explicit safety constraints, hindering systematic investigation in this direction. Moreover, it remains an open question whether such constraints can be effectively incorporated into the optimization process for multi-modal models. In this work, we present the first exploration of the Safe RLHF-V -- the first multimodal safety alignment framework. The framework consists of: (I) BeaverTails-V, the first open-source dataset featuring dual preference annotations for helpfulness and safety, supplemented with multi-level safety labels (minor, moderate, severe); (II) Beaver-Guard-V, a multi-level guardrail system to proactively defend against unsafe queries and adversarial attacks. Applying the guard model over five rounds of filtering and regeneration significantly enhances the precursor model’s overall safety by an average of 40. 9%. (II) Based on dual preference, we initiate the first exploration of multi-modal safety alignment within a constrained optimization. Experimental results demonstrate that Safe RLHF effectively improves both model helpfulness and safety. Specifically, Safe RLHF-V enhances model safety by 34. 2% and helpfulness by 34. 3%.

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

SafeVLA: Towards Safety Alignment of Vision-Language-Action Model via Constrained Learning

  • Borong Zhang
  • Yuhao Zhang
  • Jiaming Ji
  • Yingshan Lei
  • Juntao Dai
  • Yuanpei Chen
  • Yaodong Yang

Vision-language-action models (VLAs) show potential as generalist robot policies. However, these models pose extreme safety challenges during real-world deployment, including the risk of harm to the environment, the robot itself, and humans. How can safety constraints be explicitly integrated into VLAs? We address this by exploring an integrated safety approach (ISA), systematically modeling safety requirements, then actively eliciting diverse unsafe behaviors, effectively constraining VLA policies via safe reinforcement learning, and rigorously assuring their safety through targeted evaluations. Leveraging the constrained Markov decision process (CMDP) paradigm, ISA optimizes VLAs from a min-max perspective against elicited safety risks. Thus, policies aligned through this comprehensive approach achieve the following key features: (I) effective safety-performance trade-offs, reducing the cumulative cost of safety violations by 83. 58\% compared to the state-of-the-art method, while also maintaining task success rate (+3. 85\%). (II) strong safety assurance, with the ability to mitigate long-tail risks and handle extreme failure scenarios. (III) robust generalization of learned safety behaviors to various out-of-distribution perturbations. The effectiveness is evaluated on long-horizon mobile manipulation tasks.

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Aligner: Efficient Alignment by Learning to Correct

  • Jiaming Ji
  • Boyuan Chen
  • Hantao Lou
  • Donghai Hong
  • Borong Zhang
  • Xuehai Pan
  • Juntao Dai
  • Tianyi Qiu

With the rapid development of large language models (LLMs) and ever-evolving practical requirements, finding an efficient and effective alignment method has never been more critical. However, the tension between the complexity of current alignment methods and the need for rapid iteration in deployment scenarios necessitates the development of a model-agnostic alignment approach that can operate under these constraints. In this paper, we introduce Aligner, a novel and simple alignment paradigm that learns the correctional residuals between preferred and dispreferred answers using a small model. Designed as a model-agnostic, plug-and-play module, Aligner can be directly applied to various open-source and API-based models with only one-off training, making it suitable for rapid iteration. Notably, Aligner can be applied to any powerful, large-scale upstream models. Moreover, it can even iteratively bootstrap the upstream models using corrected responses as synthetic human preference data, breaking through the model's performance ceiling. Our experiments demonstrate performance improvements by deploying the same Aligner model across 11 different LLMs, evaluated on the 3H dimensions (helpfulness, harmlessness, and honesty). Specifically, Aligner-7B has achieved an average improvement of 68. 9% in helpfulness and 22. 8% in harmlessness across the tested LLMs while also effectively reducing hallucination. In the Alpaca-Eval leaderboard, stacking Aligner-2B on GPT-4 Turbo improved its LC Win Rate from 55. 0% to 58. 3%, surpassing GPT-4 Omni's 57. 5% Win Rate (community report).

JMLR Journal 2024 Journal Article

OmniSafe: An Infrastructure for Accelerating Safe Reinforcement Learning Research

  • Jiaming Ji
  • Jiayi Zhou
  • Borong Zhang
  • Juntao Dai
  • Xuehai Pan
  • Ruiyang Sun
  • Weidong Huang
  • Yiran Geng

AI systems empowered by reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms harbor the immense potential to catalyze societal advancement, yet their deployment is often impeded by significant safety concerns. Particularly in safety-critical applications, researchers have raised concerns about unintended harms or unsafe behaviors of unaligned RL agents. The philosophy of safe reinforcement learning (SafeRL) is to align RL agents with harmless intentions and safe behavioral patterns. In SafeRL, agents learn to develop optimal policies by receiving feedback from the environment, while also fulfilling the requirement of minimizing the risk of unintended harm or unsafe behavior. However, due to the intricate nature of SafeRL algorithm implementation, combining methodologies across various domains presents a formidable challenge. This had led to an absence of a cohesive and efficacious learning framework within the contemporary SafeRL research milieu. In this work, we introduce a foundational framework designed to expedite SafeRL research endeavors. Our comprehensive framework encompasses an array of algorithms spanning different RL domains and places heavy emphasis on safety elements. Our efforts are to make the SafeRL-related research process more streamlined and efficient, therefore facilitating further research in AI safety. [abs] [ pdf ][ bib ] [ code ] &copy JMLR 2024. ( edit, beta )

ICML Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Safe Reinforcement Learning using Finite-Horizon Gradient-based Estimation

  • Juntao Dai
  • Yaodong Yang 0001
  • Qian Zheng
  • Gang Pan 0001

A key aspect of Safe Reinforcement Learning (Safe RL) involves estimating the constraint condition for the next policy, which is crucial for guiding the optimization of safe policy updates. However, the existing Advantage-based Estimation (ABE) method relies on the infinite-horizon discounted advantage function. This dependence leads to catastrophic errors in finite-horizon scenarios with non-discounted constraints, resulting in safety-violation updates. In response, we propose the first estimation method for finite-horizon non-discounted constraints in deep Safe RL, termed Gradient-based Estimation (GBE), which relies on the analytic gradient derived along trajectories. Our theoretical and empirical analyses demonstrate that GBE can effectively estimate constraint changes over a finite horizon. Constructing a surrogate optimization problem with GBE, we developed a novel Safe RL algorithm called Constrained Gradient-based Policy Optimization (CGPO). CGPO identifies feasible optimal policies by iteratively resolving sub-problems within trust regions. Our empirical results reveal that CGPO, unlike baseline algorithms, successfully estimates the constraint functions of subsequent policies, thereby ensuring the efficiency and feasibility of each update.

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

SafeSora: Towards Safety Alignment of Text2Video Generation via a Human Preference Dataset

  • Juntao Dai
  • Tianle Chen
  • Xuyao Wang
  • Ziran Yang
  • Taiye Chen
  • Jiaming Ji
  • Yaodong Yang

To mitigate the risk of harmful outputs from large vision models (LVMs), we introduce the SafeSora dataset to promote research on aligning text-to-video generation with human values. This dataset encompasses human preferences in text-to-video generation tasks along two primary dimensions: helpfulness and harmlessness. To capture in-depth human preferences and facilitate structured reasoning by crowdworkers, we subdivide helpfulness into 4 sub-dimensions and harmlessness into 12 sub-categories, serving as the basis for pilot annotations. The SafeSora dataset includes 14, 711 unique prompts, 57, 333 unique videos generated by 4 distinct LVMs, and 51, 691 pairs of preference annotations labeled by humans. We further demonstrate the utility of the SafeSora dataset through several applications, including training the text-video moderation model and aligning LVMs with human preference by fine-tuning a prompt augmentation module or the diffusion model. These applications highlight its potential as the foundation for text-to-video alignment research, such as human preference modeling and the development and validation of alignment algorithms. Our project is available at https: //sites. google. com/view/safe-sora. Warning: this paper contains example data that may be offensive or harmful.

AAAI Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Augmented Proximal Policy Optimization for Safe Reinforcement Learning

  • Juntao Dai
  • Jiaming Ji
  • Long Yang
  • Qian Zheng
  • Gang Pan

Safe reinforcement learning considers practical scenarios that maximize the return while satisfying safety constraints. Current algorithms, which suffer from training oscillations or approximation errors, still struggle to update the policy efficiently with precise constraint satisfaction. In this article, we propose Augmented Proximal Policy Optimization (APPO), which augments the Lagrangian function of the primal constrained problem via attaching a quadratic deviation term. The constructed multiplier-penalty function dampens cost oscillation for stable convergence while being equivalent to the primal constrained problem to precisely control safety costs. APPO alternately updates the policy and the Lagrangian multiplier via solving the constructed augmented primal-dual problem, which can be easily implemented by any first-order optimizer. We apply our APPO methods in diverse safety-constrained tasks, setting a new state of the art compared with a comprehensive list of safe RL baselines. Extensive experiments verify the merits of our method in easy implementation, stable convergence, and precise cost control.

NeurIPS Conference 2022 Conference Paper

Constrained Update Projection Approach to Safe Policy Optimization

  • Long Yang
  • Jiaming Ji
  • Juntao Dai
  • Linrui Zhang
  • Binbin Zhou
  • Pengfei Li
  • Yaodong Yang
  • Gang Pan

Safe reinforcement learning (RL) studies problems where an intelligent agent has to not only maximize reward but also avoid exploring unsafe areas. In this study, we propose CUP, a novel policy optimization method based on Constrained Update Projection framework that enjoys rigorous safety guarantee. Central to our CUP development is the newly proposed surrogate functions along with the performance bound. Compared to previous safe reinforcement learning meth- ods, CUP enjoys the benefits of 1) CUP generalizes the surrogate functions to generalized advantage estimator (GAE), leading to strong empirical performance. 2) CUP unifies performance bounds, providing a better understanding and in- terpretability for some existing algorithms; 3) CUP provides a non-convex im- plementation via only first-order optimizers, which does not require any strong approximation on the convexity of the objectives. To validate our CUP method, we compared CUP against a comprehensive list of safe RL baselines on a wide range of tasks. Experiments show the effectiveness of CUP both in terms of reward and safety constraint satisfaction. We have opened the source code of CUP at https: //github. com/zmsn-2077/CUP-safe-rl.

v2026.09.13