Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Jonathan Niles-Weed

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

18 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

18

ICML Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Trajectory Inference with Smooth Schrödinger Bridges

  • Wanli Hong
  • Yuliang Shi
  • Jonathan Niles-Weed

Motivated by applications in trajectory inference and particle tracking, we introduce Smooth Schrödinger Bridges. Our proposal generalizes prior work by allowing the reference process in the multi-marginal Schrödinger Bridge problem to be a smooth Gaussian process, leading to more regular and interpretable trajectories in applications. Though naïvely smoothing the reference process leads to a computationally intractable problem, we identify a class of processes (including the Matérn processes) for which the resulting Smooth Schrödinger Bridge problem can be lifted to a simpler problem on phase space, which can be solved in polynomial time. We develop a practical approximation of this algorithm that outperforms existing methods on numerous simulated and real single-cell RNAseq datasets.

JMLR Journal 2024 Journal Article

Existence and Minimax Theorems for Adversarial Surrogate Risks in Binary Classification

  • Natalie S. Frank
  • Jonathan Niles-Weed

We prove existence, minimax, and complementary slackness theorems for adversarial surrogate risks in binary classification. These results extend recent work that established analogous minimax and existence theorems for the adversarial classification risk. We show that such statements continue to hold for a very general class of surrogate losses; moreover, we remove some of the technical restrictions present in prior work. Our results provide an explanation for the phenomenon of transfer attacks and inform new directions in algorithm development. [abs] [ pdf ][ bib ] &copy JMLR 2024. ( edit, beta )

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Learning Elastic Costs to Shape Monge Displacements

  • Michal Klein
  • Aram-Alexandre Pooladian
  • Pierre Ablin
  • Eugène Ndiaye
  • Jonathan Niles-Weed
  • Marco Cuturi

Given a source and a target probability measure, the Monge problem studies efficient ways to map the former onto the latter. This efficiency is quantified by defining a *cost* function between source and target data. Such a cost is often set by default in the machine learning literature to the squared-Euclidean distance, $\ell^2\_2(\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{y}): =\tfrac12\|\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{y}\|\_2^2$. The benefits of using *elastic* costs, defined using a regularizer $\tau$ as $c(\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{y}): =\ell^2_2(\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{y})+\tau(\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{y})$, was recently highlighted in (Cuturi et al. 2023). Such costs shape the *displacements* of Monge maps $T$, namely the difference between a source point and its image $T(\mathbf{x})-\mathbf{x}$, by giving them a structure that matches that of the proximal operator of $\tau$. In this work, we make two important contributions to the study of elastic costs: *(i)* For any elastic cost, we propose a numerical method to compute Monge maps that are provably optimal. This provides a much-needed routine to create synthetic problems where the ground-truth OT map is known, by analogy to the Brenier theorem, which states that the gradient of any convex potential is always a valid Monge map for the $\ell_2^2$ cost; *(ii)* We propose a loss to *learn* the parameter $\theta$ of a parameterized regularizer $\tau_\theta$, and apply it in the case where $\tau_{A}({\bf z}): =\|A^\perp {\bf z}\|^2_2$. This regularizer promotes displacements that lie on a low-dimensional subspace of $\mathbb{R}^d$, spanned by the $p$ rows of $A\in\mathbb{R}^{p\times d}$. We illustrate the soundness of our procedure on synthetic data, generated using our first contribution, in which we show near-perfect recovery of $A$'s subspace using only samples. We demonstrate the applicability of this method by showing predictive improvements on single-cell data tasks.

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Progressive Entropic Optimal Transport Solvers

  • Parnian Kassraie
  • Aram-Alexandre Pooladian
  • Michal Klein
  • James Thornton
  • Jonathan Niles-Weed
  • Marco Cuturi

Optimal transport (OT) has profoundly impacted machine learning by providing theoretical and computational tools to realign datasets. In this context, given two large point clouds of sizes $n$ and $m$ in $\mathbb{R}^d$, entropic OT (EOT) solvers have emerged as the most reliable tool to either solve the Kantorovich problem and output a $n\times m$ coupling matrix, or to solve the Monge problem and learn a vector-valued push-forward map. While the robustness of EOT couplings/maps makes them a go-to choice in practical applications, EOT solvers remain difficult to tune because of a small but influential set of hyperparameters, notably the omnipresent entropic regularization strength $\varepsilon$. Setting $\varepsilon$ can be difficult, as it simultaneously impacts various performance metrics, such as compute speed, statistical performance, generalization, and bias. In this work, we propose a new class of EOT solvers (ProgOT), that can estimate both plans and transport maps. We take advantage of several opportunities to optimize the computation of EOT solutions by *dividing* mass displacement using a time discretization, borrowing inspiration from dynamic OT formulations, and *conquering* each of these steps using EOT with properly scheduled parameters. We provide experimental evidence demonstrating that ProgOT is a faster and more robust alternative to *standard solvers* when computing couplings at large scales, even outperforming neural network-based approaches. We also prove statistical consistency of our approach for estimating OT maps.

ICML Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Minimax estimation of discontinuous optimal transport maps: The semi-discrete case

  • Aram-Alexandre Pooladian
  • Vincent Divol
  • Jonathan Niles-Weed

We consider the problem of estimating the optimal transport map between two probability distributions, $P$ and $Q$ in $\mathbb{R}^d$, on the basis of i. i. d. samples. All existing statistical analyses of this problem require the assumption that the transport map is Lipschitz, a strong requirement that, in particular, excludes any examples where the transport map is discontinuous. As a first step towards developing estimation procedures for discontinuous maps, we consider the important special case where the data distribution $Q$ is a discrete measure supported on a finite number of points in $\mathbb{R}^d$. We study a computationally efficient estimator initially proposed by (Pooladian & Niles-Weed, 2021), based on entropic optimal transport, and show in the semi-discrete setting that it converges at the minimax-optimal rate $n^{-1/2}$, independent of dimension. Other standard map estimation techniques both lack finite-sample guarantees in this setting and provably suffer from the curse of dimensionality. We confirm these results in numerical experiments, and provide experiments for other settings, not covered by our theory, which indicate that the entropic estimator is a promising methodology for other discontinuous transport map estimation problems.

ICML Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Perturbation Analysis of Neural Collapse

  • Tom Tirer
  • Haoxiang Huang
  • Jonathan Niles-Weed

Training deep neural networks for classification often includes minimizing the training loss beyond the zero training error point. In this phase of training, a "neural collapse" behavior has been observed: the variability of features (outputs of the penultimate layer) of within-class samples decreases and the mean features of different classes approach a certain tight frame structure. Recent works analyze this behavior via idealized unconstrained features models where all the minimizers exhibit exact collapse. However, with practical networks and datasets, the features typically do not reach exact collapse, e. g. , because deep layers cannot arbitrarily modify intermediate features that are far from being collapsed. In this paper, we propose a richer model that can capture this phenomenon by forcing the features to stay in the vicinity of a predefined features matrix (e. g. , intermediate features). We explore the model in the small vicinity case via perturbation analysis and establish results that cannot be obtained by the previously studied models. For example, we prove reduction in the within-class variability of the optimized features compared to the predefined input features (via analyzing gradient flow on the "central-path" with minimal assumptions), analyze the minimizers in the near-collapse regime, and provide insights on the effect of regularization hyperparameters on the closeness to collapse. We support our theory with experiments in practical deep learning settings.

NeurIPS Conference 2023 Conference Paper

The Adversarial Consistency of Surrogate Risks for Binary Classification

  • Natalie Frank
  • Jonathan Niles-Weed

We study the consistency of surrogate risks for robust binary classification. It is common to learn robust classifiers by adversarial training, which seeks to minimize the expected $0$-$1$ loss when each example can be maliciously corrupted within a small ball. We give a simple and complete characterization of the set of surrogate loss functions that are \emph{consistent}, i. e. , that can replace the $0$-$1$ loss without affecting the minimizing sequences of the original adversarial risk, for any data distribution. We also prove a quantitative version of adversarial consistency for the $\rho$-margin loss. Our results reveal that the class of adversarially consistent surrogates is substantially smaller than in the standard setting, where many common surrogates are known to be consistent.

NeurIPS Conference 2022 Conference Paper

Asymptotics of smoothed Wasserstein distances in the small noise regime

  • Yunzi Ding
  • Jonathan Niles-Weed

We study the behavior of the Wasserstein-$2$ distance between discrete measures $\mu$ and $\nu$ in $\mathbb{R}^d$ when both measures are smoothed by small amounts of Gaussian noise. This procedure, known as Gaussian-smoothed optimal transport, has recently attracted attention as a statistically attractive alternative to the unregularized Wasserstein distance. We give precise bounds on the approximation properties of this proposal in the small noise regime, and establish the existence of a phase transition: we show that, if the optimal transport plan from $\mu$ to $\nu$ is unique and a perfect matching, there exists a critical threshold such that the difference between $W_2(\mu, \nu)$ and the Gaussian-smoothed OT distance $W_2(\mu \ast \mathcal{N}_\sigma, \nu\ast \mathcal{N}_\sigma)$ scales like $\exp(-c /\sigma^2)$ for $\sigma$ below the threshold, and scales like $\sigma$ above it. These results establish that for $\sigma$ sufficiently small, the smoothed Wasserstein distance approximates the unregularized distance exponentially well.

ICML Conference 2022 Conference Paper

Debiaser Beware: Pitfalls of Centering Regularized Transport Maps

  • Aram-Alexandre Pooladian
  • Marco Cuturi
  • Jonathan Niles-Weed

Estimating optimal transport (OT) maps (a. k. a. Monge maps) between two measures P and Q is a problem fraught with computational and statistical challenges. A promising approach lies in using the dual potential functions obtained when solving an entropy-regularized OT problem between samples P_n and Q_n, which can be used to recover an approximately optimal map. The negentropy penalization in that scheme introduces, however, an estimation bias that grows with the regularization strength. A well-known remedy to debias such estimates, which has gained wide popularity among practitioners of regularized OT, is to center them, by subtracting auxiliary problems involving P_n and itself, as well as Q_n and itself. We do prove that, under favorable conditions on P and Q, debiasing can yield better approximations to the Monge map. However, and perhaps surprisingly, we present a few cases in which debiasing is provably detrimental in a statistical sense, notably when the regularization strength is large or the number of samples is small. These claims are validated experimentally on synthetic and real datasets, and should reopen the debate on whether debiasing is needed when using entropic OT.

ICML Conference 2022 Conference Paper

Deep Probability Estimation

  • Sheng Liu
  • Aakash Kaku
  • Weicheng Zhu
  • Matan Leibovich
  • Sreyas Mohan
  • Boyang Yu 0003
  • Haoxiang Huang
  • Laure Zanna

Reliable probability estimation is of crucial importance in many real-world applications where there is inherent (aleatoric) uncertainty. Probability-estimation models are trained on observed outcomes (e. g. whether it has rained or not, or whether a patient has died or not), because the ground-truth probabilities of the events of interest are typically unknown. The problem is therefore analogous to binary classification, with the difference that the objective is to estimate probabilities rather than predicting the specific outcome. This work investigates probability estimation from high-dimensional data using deep neural networks. There exist several methods to improve the probabilities generated by these models but they mostly focus on model (epistemic) uncertainty. For problems with inherent uncertainty, it is challenging to evaluate performance without access to ground-truth probabilities. To address this, we build a synthetic dataset to study and compare different computable metrics. We evaluate existing methods on the synthetic data as well as on three real-world probability estimation tasks, all of which involve inherent uncertainty: precipitation forecasting from radar images, predicting cancer patient survival from histopathology images, and predicting car crashes from dashcam videos. We also give a theoretical analysis of a model for high-dimensional probability estimation which reproduces several of the phenomena evinced in our experiments. Finally, we propose a new method for probability estimation using neural networks, which modifies the training process to promote output probabilities that are consistent with empirical probabilities computed from the data. The method outperforms existing approaches on most metrics on the simulated as well as real-world data.

NeurIPS Conference 2022 Conference Paper

Distributional Convergence of the Sliced Wasserstein Process

  • Jiaqi Xi
  • Jonathan Niles-Weed

Motivated by the statistical and computational challenges of computing Wasserstein distances in high-dimensional contexts, machine learning researchers have defined modified Wasserstein distances based on computing distances between one-dimensional projections of the measures. Different choices of how to aggregate these projected distances (averaging, random sampling, maximizing) give rise to different distances, requiring different statistical analyses. We define the \emph{Sliced Wasserstein Process}, a stochastic process defined by the empirical Wasserstein distance between projections of empirical probability measures to all one-dimensional subspaces, and prove a uniform distributional limit theorem for this process. As a result, we obtain a unified framework in which to prove sample complexity and distributional limit results for all Wasserstein distances based on one-dimensional projections. We illustrate these results on a number of examples where no distributional limits were previously known.

SODA Conference 2022 Conference Paper

Strong recovery of geometric planted matchings

  • Dmitriy Kunisky
  • Jonathan Niles-Weed

We study the problem of efficiently recovering the matching between an unlabelled collection of n points in ℝ d and a small random perturbation of those points. We consider a model where the initial points are i. i. d. standard Gaussian vectors, perturbed by adding i. i. d. Gaussian vectors with covariance σ 2 I d. In this setting, the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) can be found in polynomial time as the solution of a linear assignment problem. We establish thresholds on σ 2 for the MLE to perfectly recover the planted matching (making no errors) and to strongly recover the planted matching (making o ( n ) errors) both for d constant and d = d ( n ) growing arbitrarily. Between these two thresholds, we show that the MLE makes n δ+o (1) errors for an explicit δ ∊ (0, 1). These results extend a recent line of work on recovering matchings planted in random graphs with independently-weighted edges to the geometric setting. Our proof techniques rely on careful analysis of the combinatorial structure of partial matchings in large, weakly dependent random graphs using the first and second moment methods.

NeurIPS Conference 2020 Conference Paper

Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labels

  • Sheng Liu
  • Jonathan Niles-Weed
  • Narges Razavian
  • Carlos Fernandez-Granda

We propose a novel framework to perform classification via deep learning in the presence of noisy annotations. When trained on noisy labels, deep neural networks have been observed to first fit the training data with clean labels during an "early learning" phase, before eventually memorizing the examples with false labels. We prove that early learning and memorization are fundamental phenomena in high-dimensional classification tasks, even in simple linear models, and give a theoretical explanation in this setting. Motivated by these findings, we develop a new technique for noisy classification tasks, which exploits the progress of the early learning phase. In contrast with existing approaches, which use the model output during early learning to detect the examples with clean labels, and either ignore or attempt to correct the false labels, we take a different route and instead capitalize on early learning via regularization. There are two key elements to our approach. First, we leverage semi-supervised learning techniques to produce target probabilities based on the model outputs. Second, we design a regularization term that steers the model towards these targets, implicitly preventing memorization of the false labels. The resulting framework is shown to provide robustness to noisy annotations on several standard benchmarks and real-world datasets, where it achieves results comparable to the state of the art.

ICML Conference 2020 Conference Paper

Supervised Quantile Normalization for Low Rank Matrix Factorization

  • Marco Cuturi
  • Olivier Teboul
  • Jonathan Niles-Weed
  • Jean-Philippe Vert

Low rank matrix factorization is a fundamental building block in machine learning, used for instance to summarize gene expression profile data or word-document counts. To be robust to outliers and differences in scale across features, a matrix factorization step is usually preceded by ad-hoc feature normalization steps, such as tf-idf scaling or data whitening. We propose in this work to learn these normalization operators jointly with the factorization itself. More precisely, given a $d\times n$ matrix $X$ of $d$ features measured on $n$ individuals, we propose to learn the parameters of quantile normalization operators that can operate row-wise on the values of $X$ and/or of its factorization $UV$ to improve the quality of the low-rank representation of $X$ itself. This optimization is facilitated by the introduction of a new differentiable quantile normalization operator built using optimal transport, providing new results on top of existing work by Cuturi et al. (2019). We demonstrate the applicability of these techniques on synthetic and genomics datasets.

NeurIPS Conference 2020 Conference Paper

The All-or-Nothing Phenomenon in Sparse Tensor PCA

  • Jonathan Niles-Weed
  • Ilias Zadik

We study the statistical problem of estimating a rank-one sparse tensor corrupted by additive gaussian noise, a Gaussian additive model also known as sparse tensor PCA. We show that for Bernoulli and Bernoulli-Rademacher distributed signals and \emph{for all} sparsity levels which are sublinear in the dimension of the signal, the sparse tensor PCA model exhibits a phase transition called the \emph{all-or-nothing phenomenon}. This is the property that for some signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) $\mathrm{SNR_c}$ and any fixed $\epsilon>0$, if the SNR of the model is below $\left(1-\epsilon\right)\mathrm{SNR_c}$, then it is impossible to achieve any arbitrarily small constant correlation with the hidden signal, while if the SNR is above $\left(1+\epsilon \right)\mathrm{SNR_c}$, then it is possible to achieve almost perfect correlation with the hidden signal. The all-or-nothing phenomenon was initially established in the context of sparse linear regression, and over the last year also in the context of sparse 2-tensor (matrix) PCA and Bernoulli group testing. Our results follow from a more general result showing that for any Gaussian additive model with a discrete uniform prior, the all-or-nothing phenomenon follows as a direct outcome of an appropriately defined ``near-orthogonality" property of the support of the prior distribution.

NeurIPS Conference 2019 Conference Paper

Massively scalable Sinkhorn distances via the Nyström method

  • Jason Altschuler
  • Francis Bach
  • Alessandro Rudi
  • Jonathan Niles-Weed

The Sinkhorn "distance, " a variant of the Wasserstein distance with entropic regularization, is an increasingly popular tool in machine learning and statistical inference. However, the time and memory requirements of standard algorithms for computing this distance grow quadratically with the size of the data, rendering them prohibitively expensive on massive data sets. In this work, we show that this challenge is surprisingly easy to circumvent: combining two simple techniques—the Nyström method and Sinkhorn scaling—provably yields an accurate approximation of the Sinkhorn distance with significantly lower time and memory requirements than other approaches. We prove our results via new, explicit analyses of the Nyström method and of the stability properties of Sinkhorn scaling. We validate our claims experimentally by showing that our approach easily computes Sinkhorn distances on data sets hundreds of times larger than can be handled by other techniques.

NeurIPS Conference 2019 Conference Paper

Statistical bounds for entropic optimal transport: sample complexity and the central limit theorem

  • Gonzalo Mena
  • Jonathan Niles-Weed

We prove several fundamental statistical bounds for entropic OT with the squared Euclidean cost between subgaussian probability measures in arbitrary dimension. First, through a new sample complexity result we establish the rate of convergence of entropic OT for empirical measures. Our analysis improves exponentially on the bound of Genevay et al. ~(2019) and extends their work to unbounded measures. Second, we establish a central limit theorem for entropic OT, based on techniques developed by Del Barrio and Loubes~(2019). Previously, such a result was only known for finite metric spaces. As an application of our results, we develop and analyze a new technique for estimating the entropy of a random variable corrupted by gaussian noise.

NeurIPS Conference 2017 Conference Paper

Near-linear time approximation algorithms for optimal transport via Sinkhorn iteration

  • Jason Altschuler
  • Jonathan Niles-Weed
  • Philippe Rigollet

Computing optimal transport distances such as the earth mover's distance is a fundamental problem in machine learning, statistics, and computer vision. Despite the recent introduction of several algorithms with good empirical performance, it is unknown whether general optimal transport distances can be approximated in near-linear time. This paper demonstrates that this ambitious goal is in fact achieved by Cuturi's Sinkhorn Distances. This result relies on a new analysis of Sinkhorn iterations, which also directly suggests a new greedy coordinate descent algorithm Greenkhorn with the same theoretical guarantees. Numerical simulations illustrate that Greenkhorn significantly outperforms the classical Sinkhorn algorithm in practice.

v2026.09.13