Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Jon Stone

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

3 papers
1 author row

Possible papers

3

YNICL Journal 2024 Journal Article

Response to the Letter Concerning the Publication: Neuroimaging in Functional Neurological Disorder: State of the Field and Research Agenda. Perez DL et al. Neuroimage Clin. 2021;30:102623

  • David L. Perez
  • Timothy R. Nicholson
  • Ali A. Asadi-Pooya
  • Matthew Butler
  • Alan J. Carson
  • Anthony S. David
  • Quinton Deeley
  • Ibai Diez

In their letter, Tuller and colleagues raise concerns regarding the following introductory phrase and the linked Stone et al (2010) reference: "this renewed interest parallels recognition that FND [functional neurological disorder] is the 2nd most common outpatient neurologic diagnosis."While we appreciate there is complexity to epidemiological considerations in FND, we do not agree with the concerns raised.We share our perspective on this matter with the following four points:

YNICL Journal 2021 Journal Article

Neuroimaging in Functional Neurological Disorder: State of the Field and Research Agenda

  • David L. Perez
  • Timothy R. Nicholson
  • Ali A. Asadi-Pooya
  • Indrit Bègue
  • Matthew Butler
  • Alan J. Carson
  • Anthony S. David
  • Quinton Deeley

Functional neurological disorder (FND) was of great interest to early clinical neuroscience leaders. During the 20th century, neurology and psychiatry grew apart - leaving FND a borderland condition. Fortunately, a renaissance has occurred in the last two decades, fostered by increased recognition that FND is prevalent and diagnosed using "rule-in" examination signs. The parallel use of scientific tools to bridge brain structure - function relationships has helped refine an integrated biopsychosocial framework through which to conceptualize FND. In particular, a growing number of quality neuroimaging studies using a variety of methodologies have shed light on the emerging pathophysiology of FND. This renewed scientific interest has occurred in parallel with enhanced interdisciplinary collaborations, as illustrated by new care models combining psychological and physical therapies and the creation of a new multidisciplinary FND society supporting knowledge dissemination in the field. Within this context, this article summarizes the output of the first International FND Neuroimaging Workgroup meeting, held virtually, on June 17th, 2020 to appraise the state of neuroimaging research in the field and to catalyze large-scale collaborations. We first briefly summarize neural circuit models of FND, and then detail the research approaches used to date in FND within core content areas: cohort characterization; control group considerations; task-based functional neuroimaging; resting-state networks; structural neuroimaging; biomarkers of symptom severity and risk of illness; and predictors of treatment response and prognosis. Lastly, we outline a neuroimaging-focused research agenda to elucidate the pathophysiology of FND and aid the development of novel biologically and psychologically-informed treatments.

YNICL Journal 2019 Journal Article

Structural alterations in functional neurological disorder and related conditions: a software and hardware problem?

  • Indrit Bègue
  • Caitlin Adams
  • Jon Stone
  • David L. Perez

Functional neurological (conversion) disorder (FND) is a condition at the interface of neurology and psychiatry. A "software" vs. "hardware" analogy describes abnormal neurobiological mechanisms occurring in the context of intact macroscopic brain structure. While useful for explanatory and treatment models, this framework may require more nuanced considerations in the context of quantitative structural neuroimaging findings in FND. Moreover, high co-occurrence of FND and somatic symptom disorders (SSD) as defined in DSM-IV (somatization disorder, somatoform pain disorder, and undifferentiated somatoform disorder; referred to as SSD for brevity in this article) raises the possibility of a partially overlapping pathophysiology. In this systematic review, we use a transdiagnostic approach to review and appraise the structural neuroimaging literature in FND and SSD. While larger sample size studies are needed for definitive characterization, this article highlights that individuals with FND and SSD may exhibit sensorimotor, prefrontal, striatal-thalamic, paralimbic, and limbic structural alterations. The structural neuroimaging literature is contextualized within the neurobiology of stress-related neuroplasticity, gender differences, psychiatric comorbidities, and the greater spectrum of functional somatic disorders. Future directions that could accelerate the characterization of the pathophysiology of FND and DSM-5 SSD are outlined, including "disease staging" discussions to contextualize subgroups with or without structural changes. Emerging neuroimaging evidence suggests that some individuals with FND and SSD may have a "software" and "hardware" problem, although if structural alterations are present the neural mechanisms of functional disorders remain distinct from lesional neurological conditions. Furthermore, it remains unclear whether structural alterations relate to predisposing vulnerabilities or consequences of the disorder.

v2026.09.13