EAAI Journal 2026 Journal Article
An information-aggregated multiple-criteria design evaluation method by exploring reliability, fuzziness and divergence from uncertain linguistic preferences
- Jin Qi
- Haiqing Huang
- Jie Hu
- Yinghong Peng
This paper proposes a new information-aggregated multiple-criteria group evaluation method, by using linguistic D-number (LDN) and other uncertainty treatment approaches, named as LDN-based design evaluation with multiple information (LDN-MI). In LDN-MI, the group-level LDN-expressed preferences are generated to form the L-preference space, which capture initial linguistic preference (z) and its reliability (r) information from expert and user groups. Then, the fuzziness (f) and divergence (d) of L-preference are further explored by using rough number and information entropy. Finally, a multi-information aggregation approach is proposed to integrate with z, r, f and d. Different from classical pure preference-only method, this study presents a new evaluation principle, that is, the candidate, which is favored by decision-makers (DMs) (higher z) with reliable (higher r) and clear (lower f) decision altitudes under important criteria (higher d), is selected as the best one. A design example and empirical analysis have been carried out to validate the feasibility and superiority of LDN-MI. Experimental results show that: i) LDN-MI makes more reasonable evaluation than traditional approaches, as the advantage of the best one chosen by LDN-MI has been justified; ii) LDN-MI is robust to preference data from different DM groups, no matter expert-only, user-only or combined group; iii) LDN-MI is also robust to different classifications of important evaluation criteria; iv) the aggregation of complete z, r, f and d yields better results than those aggregating incomplete information, and the sensitiveness of LDN-MI to r, f and d depends on the differences among DMs' decisions.