Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Jean Mercat

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

8 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

8

ICLR Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Language models scale reliably with over-training and on downstream tasks

  • Samir Yitzhak Gadre
  • Georgios Smyrnis
  • Vaishaal Shankar
  • Suchin Gururangan
  • Mitchell Wortsman
  • Rulin Shao
  • Jean Mercat
  • Alex Fang

Scaling laws are useful guides for derisking expensive training runs, as they predict performance of large models using cheaper, small-scale experiments. However, there remain gaps between current scaling studies and how language models are ultimately trained and evaluated. For instance, scaling is usually studied in the compute-optimal training regime (i.e., "Chinchilla optimal" regime). In contrast, models are often over-trained to reduce inference costs. Moreover, scaling laws mostly predict loss on next-token prediction, but models are usually compared on downstream task performance. To address both shortcomings, we create a testbed of 104 models with 0.011B to 6.9B parameters trained with various numbers of tokens on three data distributions. First, we fit scaling laws that extrapolate in both the amount of over-training and the number of model parameters. This enables us to predict the validation loss of a 1.4B parameter, 900B token run (i.e., 32$\times$ over-trained) and a 6.9B parameter, 138B token run (i.e., a compute-optimal run)––each from experiments that take 300$\times$ less compute. Second, we relate the perplexity of a language model to its downstream task performance by proposing a power law. We use this law to predict top-1 error averaged over downstream tasks for the two aforementioned models, using experiments that take 20$\times$ less compute.

ICLR Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Should VLMs be Pre-trained with Image Data?

  • Sedrick Keh
  • Jean Mercat
  • Samir Yitzhak Gadre
  • Kushal Arora
  • Igor Vasiljevic
  • Benjamin Burchfiel
  • Shuran Song
  • Russ Tedrake

Pre-trained LLMs that are further trained with image data perform well on vision-language tasks. While adding images during a second training phase effectively unlocks this capability, it is unclear how much of a gain or loss this two-step pipeline gives over VLMs which integrate images earlier into the training process. To investigate this, we train models spanning various datasets, scales, image-text ratios, and amount of pre-training done before introducing vision tokens. We then fine-tune these models and evaluate their downstream performance on a suite of vision-language and text-only tasks. We find that pre-training with a mixture of image and text data allows models to perform better on vision-language tasks while maintaining strong performance on text-only evaluations. On an average of 6 diverse tasks, we find that for a 1B model, introducing visual tokens 80\% of the way through pre-training results in a 2\% average improvement over introducing visual tokens to a fully pre-trained model.

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

DataComp-LM: In search of the next generation of training sets for language models

  • Jeffrey Li
  • Alex Fang
  • Georgios Smyrnis
  • Maor Ivgi
  • Matt Jordan
  • Samir Gadre
  • Hritik Bansal
  • Etash Guha

We introduce DataComp for Language Models, a testbed for controlled dataset experiments with the goal of improving language models. As part of DCLM, we provide a standardized corpus of 240T tokens extracted from Common Crawl, effective pretraining recipes based on the OpenLM framework, and a broad suite of 53 downstream evaluations. Participants in the DCLM benchmark can experiment with data curation strategies such as deduplication, filtering, and data mixing atmodel scales ranging from 412M to 7B parameters. As a baseline for DCLM, we conduct extensive experiments and find that model-based filtering is key to assembling a high-quality training set. The resulting dataset, DCLM-Baseline, enables training a 7B parameter language model from scratch to 63% 5-shot accuracy on MMLU with 2T training tokens. Compared to MAP-Neo, the previous state-of-the-art in open-data language models, DCLM-Baseline represents a 6 percentage point improvement on MMLU while being trained with half the compute. Our results highlight the importance of dataset design for training language models and offer a starting point for further research on data curation. We release the \dclm benchmark, framework, models, and datasets at https: //www. datacomp. ai/dclm/

IROS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Multi-Modal Representation Learning with Tactile Data

  • Hyung-Gun Chi
  • Jose A. Barreiros
  • Jean Mercat
  • Karthik Ramani
  • Thomas Kollar

Advancements in embodied language models like PALM-E and RT-2 have significantly enhanced language-conditioned robotic manipulation. However, these advances remain predominantly focused on vision and language, often overlooking the pivotal role of tactile feedback which is advantageous in contact-rich interactions. Our research introduces a novel approach that synergizes tactile information with vision and language. We present the Multi-Modal Wand (MMWand) dataset enriched with linguistic descriptions and tactile data. By integrating tactile feedback, we aim to bridge the divide between human linguistic understanding and robotic sensory interpretation. Our multi-modal representation model is trained on these datasets by employing the multi-modal embedding alignment principle from ImageBind which has shown promising results, emphasizing the potential of tactile data in robotic applications. The validation of our approach in downstream robotics tasks, such as texture-based object classification, cross-modality retrieval, and the dense reward function for visuomotor control, attests to its effectiveness. Our contributions underscore the importance of tactile feedback in multi-modal robotic learning and its potential to enhance robotic tasks. The MMWand dataset is publicly available at https://hyung-gun.me/mmwand/.

NeurIPS Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Residual Q-Learning: Offline and Online Policy Customization without Value

  • Chenran Li
  • Chen Tang
  • Haruki Nishimura
  • Jean Mercat
  • Masayoshi Tomizuka
  • Wei Zhan

Imitation Learning (IL) is a widely used framework for learning imitative behavior from demonstrations. It is especially appealing for solving complex real-world tasks where handcrafting reward function is difficult, or when the goal is to mimic human expert behavior. However, the learned imitative policy can only follow the behavior in the demonstration. When applying the imitative policy, we may need to customize the policy behavior to meet different requirements coming from diverse downstream tasks. Meanwhile, we still want the customized policy to maintain its imitative nature. To this end, we formulate a new problem setting called policy customization. It defines the learning task as training a policy that inherits the characteristics of the prior policy while satisfying some additional requirements imposed by a target downstream task. We propose a novel and principled approach to interpret and determine the trade-off between the two task objectives. Specifically, we formulate the customization problem as a Markov Decision Process (MDP) with a reward function that combines 1) the inherent reward of the demonstration; and 2) the add-on reward specified by the downstream task. We propose a novel framework, Residual Q-learning, which can solve the formulated MDP by leveraging the prior policy without knowing the inherent reward or value function of the prior policy. We derive a family of residual Q-learning algorithms that can realize offline and online policy customization, and show that the proposed algorithms can effectively accomplish policy customization tasks in various environments. Demo videos and code are available on our website: https: //sites. google. com/view/residualq-learning.

ICRA Conference 2022 Conference Paper

Control-Aware Prediction Objectives for Autonomous Driving

  • Rowan McAllister
  • Blake Wulfe
  • Jean Mercat
  • Logan Ellis
  • Sergey Levine
  • Adrien Gaidon

Autonomous vehicle software is typically structured as a modular pipeline of individual components (e. g. , perception, prediction, and planning) to help separate concerns into interpretable sub-tasks. Even when end-to-end training is possible, each module has its own set of objectives used for safety assurance, sample efficiency, regularization, or interpretability. However, intermediate objectives do not always align with overall system performance. For example, optimizing the likelihood of a trajectory prediction module might focus more on easy-to-predict agents than safety-critical or rare behaviors (e. g. , jaywalking). In this paper, we present control-aware prediction objectives (CAPOs), to evaluate the down-stream effect of predictions on control without requiring the planner be differentiable. We propose two types of importance weights that weight the predictive likelihood: one using an attention model between agents, and another based on control variation when exchanging predicted trajectories for ground truth trajectories. Experimentally, we show our objectives improve overall system performance in suburban driving scenarios using the CARLA simulator.

ICLR Conference 2022 Conference Paper

Dynamics-Aware Comparison of Learned Reward Functions

  • Blake Wulfe
  • Logan Ellis
  • Jean Mercat
  • Rowan McAllister
  • Adrien Gaidon

The ability to learn reward functions plays an important role in enabling the deployment of intelligent agents in the real world. However, $\textit{comparing}$ reward functions, for example as a means of evaluating reward learning methods, presents a challenge. Reward functions are typically compared by considering the behavior of optimized policies, but this approach conflates deficiencies in the reward function with those of the policy search algorithm used to optimize it. To address this challenge, Gleave et al. (2020) propose the Equivalent-Policy Invariant Comparison (EPIC) distance. EPIC avoids policy optimization, but in doing so requires computing reward values at transitions that may be impossible under the system dynamics. This is problematic for learned reward functions because it entails evaluating them outside of their training distribution, resulting in inaccurate reward values that we show can render EPIC ineffective at comparing rewards. To address this problem, we propose the Dynamics-Aware Reward Distance (DARD), a new reward pseudometric. DARD uses an approximate transition model of the environment to transform reward functions into a form that allows for comparisons that are invariant to reward shaping while only evaluating reward functions on transitions close to their training distribution. Experiments in simulated physical domains demonstrate that DARD enables reliable reward comparisons without policy optimization and is significantly more predictive than baseline methods of downstream policy performance when dealing with learned reward functions.

ICRA Conference 2020 Conference Paper

Multi-Head Attention for Multi-Modal Joint Vehicle Motion Forecasting

  • Jean Mercat
  • Thomas Gilles
  • Nicole El Zoghby
  • Guillaume Sandou
  • Dominique Beauvois
  • Guillermo Pita Gil

This paper presents a novel vehicle motion forecasting method based on multi-head attention. It produces joint forecasts for all vehicles on a road scene as sequences of multi-modal probability density functions of their positions. Its architecture uses multi-head attention to account for interactions between all vehicles, and long short-term memory layers for encoding and forecasting. It relies solely on vehicle position tracks, does not need maneuver definitions, and does not rasterize the scene as a spatial grid. This allows it to be more versatile than similar model while combining many forecasting capabilities, namely joint forecast with interactions, uncertainty estimation, and multi-modality. The resulting prediction likelihood outperforms state-of-the-art models on the same dataset.

v2026.09.13