Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Jaime Arias

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

3 papers
1 author row

Possible papers

3

JAAMAS Journal 2026 Journal Article

Strategic (timed) computation tree logic

  • Jaime Arias
  • Wojciech Jamroga
  • Teofil Sidoruk

Abstract We define extensions of \(\textbf{CTL}\) and TCTL with strategic operators, called Strategic \(\textbf{CTL}\) ( SCTL ) and Strategic TCTL ( STCTL ), respectively. For each of the above logics we give a synchronous and asynchronous semantics, i. e. STCTL is interpreted over networks of extended Timed Automata (TA) that either make synchronous moves or synchronise via joint actions. We consider several semantics regarding information: imperfect (i) and perfect (I), and recall: imperfect (r) and perfect (R). We prove that SCTL is more expressive than ATL for all semantics, and this holds for the timed versions as well. Moreover, the model checking problem for SCTL \(_{{\textbf {ir}}}\) is of the same complexity as for ATL \(_{{\textbf {ir}}}\), the model checking problem for STCTL \(_{{\textbf {iR}}}\) is of the same complexity as for TCTL, while for STCTL \(_{{\textbf {iR}}}\) it is undecidable as for ATL \(_{{\textbf {iR}}}\). The above results suggest to use SCTL \(_{{\textbf {ir}}}\) and STCTL \(_{{\textbf {ir}}}\) in practical applications. Therefore, we use the tool IMITATOR to support model checking of STCTL \(_{{\textbf {ir}}}\).

AAMAS Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Strategic (Timed) Computation Tree Logic

  • Jaime Arias
  • Wojciech Jamroga
  • Wojciech Penczek
  • Laure Petrucci
  • Teofil Sidoruk

We define extensions of CTL and TCTL with strategic operators, called Strategic CTL (SCTL) and Strategic TCTL (STCTL), respectively. For each of the above logics we give a synchronous and asynchronous semantics, i. e. STCTL is interpreted over networks of extended Timed Automata (TA) that either make synchronous moves or synchronise via joint actions. We consider several semantics regarding information: imperfect (i) and perfect (I), and recall: imperfect (r) and perfect (R). We prove that SCTL is more expressive than ATL for all semantics, and this holds for the timed versions as well. Moreover, the model checking problem for SCTLir is of the same complexity as for ATLir, the model checking problem for STCTLir is of the same complexity as for TCTL, while for STCTLiR it is undecidable as for ATLiR. The above results suggest to use SCTLir and STCTLir in practical applications. Therefore, we use the tool IMITATOR to support model checking of STCTLir.

AAMAS Conference 2021 Conference Paper

ADT2AMAS: Managing Agents in Attack-Defence Scenarios

  • Jaime Arias
  • Wojciech Penczek
  • Laure Petrucci
  • Teofil Sidoruk

Expressing attack-defence trees (ADTrees) in a multi-agent setting allows for studying a new aspect of security scenarios, namely how the number of agents and their task assignment impact the performance of attacking and defending strategies executed by agent coalitions. Our tool ADT2AMAS allows for transforming ADTrees into extended asynchronous multi-agent systems and computing an optimal schedule with the minimal number of agents. ADT2AMAS is integrated within the graphical verification platform CosyVerif, but can also be run standalone.

v2026.09.13