Author name cluster

Isabela Albuquerque

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

8 papers

2 author rows

ICLR Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Century: A Framework and Dataset for Evaluating Historical Contextualisation of Sensitive Images

Canfer Akbulut
Kevin Robinson
Maribeth Rauh
Isabela Albuquerque
Olivia Wiles
Laura Weidinger
Verena Rieser
Yana Hasson

How do multi-modal generative models describe images of recent historical events and figures, whose legacies may be nuanced, multifaceted, or contested? This task necessitates not only accurate visual recognition, but also socio-cultural knowledge and cross-modal reasoning. To address this evaluation challenge, we introduce Century -- a novel dataset of sensitive historical images. This dataset consists of 1,500 images from recent history, created through an automated method combining knowledge graphs and language models with quality and diversity criteria created from the practices of museums and digital archives. We demonstrate through automated and human evaluation that this method produces a set of images that depict events and figures that are diverse across topics and represents all regions of the world. We additionally propose an evaluation framework for evaluating the historical contextualisation capabilities along dimensions of accuracy, thoroughness, and objectivity. We demonstrate this approach by using Century to evaluate four foundation models, scoring performance using both automated and human evaluation. We find that historical contextualisation of sensitive images poses a significant challenge for modern multi-modal foundation models, and offer practical recommendations for how developers can use Century to evaluate improvements to models and applications.

Details

ICLR Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Revisiting text-to-image evaluation with Gecko: on metrics, prompts, and human rating

Olivia Wiles
Chuhan Zhang
Isabela Albuquerque
Ivana Kajic
Su Wang 0001
Emanuele Bugliarello
Yasumasa Onoe
Pinelopi Papalampidi

While text-to-image (T2I) generative models have become ubiquitous, they do not necessarily generate images that align with a given prompt. While many metrics and benchmarks have been proposed to evaluate T2I models and alignment metrics, the impact of the evaluation components (prompt sets, human annotations, evaluation task) has not been systematically measured. We find that looking at only *one slice of data*, i.e. one set of capabilities or human annotations, is not enough to obtain stable conclusions that generalise to new conditions or slices when evaluating T2I models or alignment metrics. We address this by introducing an evaluation suite of $>$100K annotations across four human annotation templates that comprehensively evaluates models' capabilities across a range of methods for gathering human annotations and comparing models. In particular, we propose (1) a carefully curated set of prompts -- *Gecko2K*; (2) a statistically grounded method of comparing T2I models; and (3) how to systematically evaluate metrics under three *evaluation tasks* -- *model ordering, pair-wise instance scoring, point-wise instance scoring*. Using this evaluation suite, we evaluate a wide range of metrics and find that a metric may do better in one setting but worse in another. As a result, we introduce a new, interpretable auto-eval metric that is consistently better correlated with human ratings than such existing metrics on our evaluation suite--across different human templates and evaluation settings--and on TIFA160.

Details

ICML Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Evaluating Model Bias Requires Characterizing its Mistakes

Isabela Albuquerque
Jessica Schrouff
David Warde-Farley
A. Taylan Cemgil
Sven Gowal
Olivia Wiles

The ability to properly benchmark model performance in the face of spurious correlations is important to both build better predictors and increase confidence that models are operating as intended. We demonstrate that characterizing (as opposed to simply quantifying) model mistakes across subgroups is pivotal to properly reflect model biases, which are ignored by standard metrics such as worst-group accuracy or accuracy gap. Inspired by the hypothesis testing framework, we introduce SkewSize, a principled and flexible metric that captures bias from mistakes in a model’s predictions. It can be used in multi-class settings or generalised to the open vocabulary setting of generative models. SkewSize is an aggregation of the effect size of the interaction between two categorical variables: the spurious variable representing the bias attribute the model’s prediction. We demonstrate the utility of SkewSize in multiple settings including: standard vision models trained on synthetic data, vision models trained on ImageNet, and large scale vision-and-language models from the BLIP-2 family. In each case, the proposed SkewSize is able to highlight biases not captured by other metrics, while also providing insights on the impact of recently proposed techniques, such as instruction tuning.

Details

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Evaluating Numerical Reasoning in Text-to-Image Models

Ivana Kajić
Olivia Wiles
Isabela Albuquerque
Matthias Bauer
Su Wang
Jordi Pont-Tuset
Aida Nematzadeh

Text-to-image generative models are capable of producing high-quality images that often faithfully depict concepts described using natural language. In this work, we comprehensively evaluate a range of text-to-image models on numerical reasoning tasks of varying difficulty, and show that even the most advanced models have only rudimentary numerical skills. Specifically, their ability to correctly generate an exact number of objects in an image is limited to small numbers, it is highly dependent on the context the number term appears in, and it deteriorates quickly with each successive number. We also demonstrate that models have poor understanding of linguistic quantifiers (such as “few” or “as many as”), the concept of zero, and struggle with more advanced concepts such as fractional representations. We bundle prompts, generated images and human annotations into GeckoNum, a novel benchmark for evaluation of numerical reasoning.

PDF Details DOI

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Mind the Graph When Balancing Data for Fairness or Robustness

Jessica Schrouff
Alexis Bellot
Amal Rannen-Triki
Alan Malek
Isabela Albuquerque
Arthur Gretton
Alexander D'Amour
Silvia Chiappa

Failures of fairness or robustness in machine learning predictive settings can be due to undesired dependencies between covariates, outcomes and auxiliary factors of variation. A common strategy to mitigate these failures is data balancing, which attempts to remove those undesired dependencies. In this work, we define conditions on the training distribution for data balancing to lead to fair or robust models. Our results display that in many cases, the balanced distribution does not correspond to selectively removing the undesired dependencies in a causal graph of the task, leading to multiple failure modes and even interference with other mitigation techniques such as regularization. Overall, our results highlight the importance of taking the causal graph into account before performing data balancing.

PDF Details DOI

ICML Conference 2020 Conference Paper

An end-to-end approach for the verification problem: learning the right distance

João Monteiro 0002
Isabela Albuquerque
Jahangir Alam 0001
R. Devon Hjelm
Tiago H. Falk

In this contribution, we augment the metric learning setting by introducing a parametric pseudo-distance, trained jointly with the encoder. Several interpretations are thus drawn for the learned distance-like model’s output. We first show it approximates a likelihood ratio which can be used for hypothesis tests, and that it further induces a large divergence across the joint distributions of pairs of examples from the same and from different classes. Evaluation is performed under the verification setting consisting of determining whether sets of examples belong to the same class, even if such classes are novel and were never presented to the model during training. Empirical evaluation shows such method defines an end-to-end approach for the verification problem, able to attain better performance than simple scorers such as those based on cosine similarity and further outperforming widely used downstream classifiers. We further observe training is much simplified under the proposed approach compared to metric learning with actual distances, requiring no complex scheme to harvest pairs of examples.

Details

ICML Conference 2019 Conference Paper

Multi-objective training of Generative Adversarial Networks with multiple discriminators

Isabela Albuquerque
João Monteiro 0002
Thang Doan
Breandan Considine
Tiago H. Falk
Ioannis Mitliagkas

Recent literature has demonstrated promising results for training Generative Adversarial Networks by employing a set of discriminators, in contrast to the traditional game involving one generator against a single adversary. Such methods perform single-objective optimization on some simple consolidation of the losses, e. g. an arithmetic average. In this work, we revisit the multiple-discriminator setting by framing the simultaneous minimization of losses provided by different models as a multi-objective optimization problem. Specifically, we evaluate the performance of multiple gradient descent and the hypervolume maximization algorithm on a number of different datasets. Moreover, we argue that the previously proposed methods and hypervolume maximization can all be seen as variations of multiple gradient descent in which the update direction can be computed efficiently. Our results indicate that hypervolume maximization presents a better compromise between sample quality and computational cost than previous methods.

Details

AAAI Conference 2019 Conference Paper

On-Line Adaptative Curriculum Learning for GANs

Thang Doan
João Monteiro
Isabela Albuquerque
Bogdan Mazoure
Audrey Durand
Joelle Pineau
R. Devon Hjelm

Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) can successfully approximate a probability distribution and produce realistic samples. However, open questions such as sufficient convergence conditions and mode collapse still persist. In this paper, we build on existing work in the area by proposing a novel framework for training the generator against an ensemble of discriminator networks, which can be seen as a one-student/multiple-teachers setting. We formalize this problem within the full-information adversarial bandit framework, where we evaluate the capability of an algorithm to select mixtures of discriminators for providing the generator with feedback during learning. To this end, we propose a reward function which reflects the progress made by the generator and dynamically update the mixture weights allocated to each discriminator. We also draw connections between our algorithm and stochastic optimization methods and then show that existing approaches using multiple discriminators in literature can be recovered from our framework. We argue that less expressive discriminators are smoother and have a general coarse grained view of the modes map, which enforces the generator to cover a wide portion of the data distribution support. On the other hand, highly expressive discriminators ensure samples quality. Finally, experimental results show that our approach improves samples quality and diversity over existing baselines by effectively learning a curriculum. These results also support the claim that weaker discriminators have higher entropy improving modes coverage.

PDF Details