Author name cluster

Isaac Lage

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

4 papers

1 author row

TMLR Journal 2023 Journal Article

When Does Uncertainty Matter?: Understanding the Impact of Predictive Uncertainty in ML Assisted Decision Making

Sean McGrath
Parth Mehta
Alexandra Zytek
Isaac Lage
Himabindu Lakkaraju

As machine learning (ML) models are increasingly being employed to assist human decision makers, it becomes critical to provide these decision makers with relevant inputs which can help them decide if and how to incorporate model predictions into their decision making. For instance, communicating the uncertainty associated with model predictions could potentially be helpful in this regard. In this work, we carry out user studies (1,330 responses from 190 participants) to systematically assess how people with differing levels of expertise respond to different types of predictive uncertainty (i.e., posterior predictive distributions with different shapes and variances) in the context of ML assisted decision making for predicting apartment rental prices. We found that showing posterior predictive distributions led to smaller disagreements with the ML model's predictions, regardless of the shapes and variances of the posterior predictive distributions we considered, and that these effects may be sensitive to expertise in both ML and the domain. This suggests that posterior predictive distributions can potentially serve as useful decision aids which should be used with caution and take into account the type of distribution and the expertise of the human.

PDF Details

IJCAI Conference 2019 Conference Paper

Exploring Computational User Models for Agent Policy Summarization

Isaac Lage
Daphna Lifschitz
Finale Doshi-Velez
Ofra Amir

AI agents support high stakes decision-making processes from driving cars to prescribing drugs, making it increasingly important for human users to understand their behavior. Policy summarization methods aim to convey strengths and weaknesses of such agents by demonstrating their behavior in a subset of informative states. Some policy summarization methods extract a summary that optimizes the ability to reconstruct the agent's policy under the assumption that users will deploy inverse reinforcement learning. In this paper, we explore the use of different models for extracting summaries. We introduce an imitation learning-based approach to policy summarization; we demonstrate through computational simulations that a mismatch between the model used to extract a summary and the model used to reconstruct the policy results in worse reconstruction quality; and we demonstrate through a human-subject study that people use different models to reconstruct policies in different contexts, and that matching the summary extraction model to these can improve performance. Together, our results suggest that it is important to carefully consider user models in policy summarization.

PDF Details

AAMAS Conference 2019 Conference Paper

Toward Robust Policy Summarization

Isaac Lage
Daphna Lifschitz
Finale Doshi-Velez
Ofra Amir

AI agents are being developed to help people with high stakes decision-making processes from driving cars to prescribing drugs. It is therefore becoming increasingly important to develop “explainable AI” methods that help people understand the behavior of such agents. Summaries of agent policies can help human users anticipate agent behavior and facilitate more effective collaboration. Prior work has framed agent summarization as a machine teaching problem where examples of agent behavior are chosen to maximize reconstruction quality under the assumption that people do inverse reinforcement learning to infer an agent’s policy from demonstrations. We compare summaries generated under this assumption to summaries generated under the assumption that people use imitation learning. We show through simulations that in some domains, there exist summaries that produce high-quality reconstructions under different models, but in other domains, only matching the summary extraction model to the reconstruction model produces high-quality reconstructions. These results highlight the importance of assuming correct computational models for how humans extrapolate from a summary, suggesting human-in-the-loop approaches to summary extraction.

PDF

NeurIPS Conference 2018 Conference Paper

Human-in-the-Loop Interpretability Prior

Isaac Lage
Andrew Ross
Samuel Gershman
Been Kim
Finale Doshi-Velez

We often desire our models to be interpretable as well as accurate. Prior work on optimizing models for interpretability has relied on easy-to-quantify proxies for interpretability, such as sparsity or the number of operations required. In this work, we optimize for interpretability by directly including humans in the optimization loop. We develop an algorithm that minimizes the number of user studies to find models that are both predictive and interpretable and demonstrate our approach on several data sets. Our human subjects results show trends towards different proxy notions of interpretability on different datasets, which suggests that different proxies are preferred on different tasks.

PDF Details