Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Ian Char

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

7 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

7

ICML Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Sampling-based Multi-dimensional Recalibration

  • Youngseog Chung
  • Ian Char
  • Jeff G. Schneider

Calibration of probabilistic forecasts in the regression setting has been widely studied in the single dimensional case, where the output variables are assumed to be univariate. In many problem settings, however, the output variables are multi-dimensional, and in the presence of dependence across the output dimensions, measuring calibration and performing recalibration for each dimension separately can be both misleading and detrimental. In this work, we focus on representing predictive uncertainties via samples, and propose a recalibration method which accounts for the joint distribution across output dimensions to produce calibrated samples. Based on the concept of highest density regions (HDR), we define the notion of HDR calibration, and show that our recalibration method produces samples which are HDR calibrated. We demonstrate the performance of our method and the quality of the recalibrated samples on a suite of benchmark datasets in multi-dimensional regression, a real-world dataset in modeling plasma dynamics during nuclear fusion reactions, and on a decision-making application in forecasting demand.

ICLR Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Near-optimal Policy Identification in Active Reinforcement Learning

  • Xiang Li
  • Viraj Mehta
  • Johannes Kirschner
  • Ian Char
  • Willie Neiswanger
  • Jeff G. Schneider
  • Andreas Krause 0001
  • Ilija Bogunovic

Many real-world reinforcement learning tasks require control of complex dynamical systems that involve both costly data acquisition processes and large state spaces. In cases where the expensive transition dynamics can be readily evaluated at specified states (e.g., via a simulator), agents can operate in what is often referred to as planning with a \emph{generative model}. We propose the AE-LSVI algorithm for best policy identification, a novel variant of the kernelized least-squares value iteration (LSVI) algorithm that combines optimism with pessimism for active exploration (AE). AE-LSVI provably identifies a near-optimal policy \emph{uniformly} over an entire state space and achieves polynomial sample complexity guarantees that are independent of the number of states. When specialized to the recently introduced offline contextual Bayesian optimization setting, our algorithm achieves improved sample complexity bounds. Experimentally, we demonstrate that AE-LSVI outperforms other RL algorithms in a variety of environments when robustness to the initial state is required.

NeurIPS Conference 2023 Conference Paper

PID-Inspired Inductive Biases for Deep Reinforcement Learning in Partially Observable Control Tasks

  • Ian Char
  • Jeff Schneider

Deep reinforcement learning (RL) has shown immense potential for learning to control systems through data alone. However, one challenge deep RL faces is that the full state of the system is often not observable. When this is the case, the policy needs to leverage the history of observations to infer the current state. At the same time, differences between the training and testing environments makes it critical for the policy not to overfit to the sequence of observations it sees at training time. As such, there is an important balancing act between having the history encoder be flexible enough to extract relevant information, yet be robust to changes in the environment. To strike this balance, we look to the PID controller for inspiration. We assert the PID controller's success shows that only summing and differencing are needed to accumulate information over time for many control tasks. Following this principle, we propose two architectures for encoding history: one that directly uses PID features and another that extends these core ideas and can be used in arbitrary control tasks. When compared with prior approaches, our encoders produce policies that are often more robust and achieve better performance on a variety of tracking tasks. Going beyond tracking tasks, our policies achieve 1. 7x better performance on average over previous state-of-the-art methods on a suite of locomotion control tasks.

ICLR Conference 2022 Conference Paper

Deep Attentive Variational Inference

  • Ifigeneia Apostolopoulou
  • Ian Char
  • Elan Rosenfeld
  • Artur Dubrawski

Stochastic Variational Inference is a powerful framework for learning large-scale probabilistic latent variable models. However, typical assumptions on the factorization or independence of the latent variables can substantially restrict its capacity for inference and generative modeling. A major line of active research aims at building more expressive variational models by designing deep hierarchies of interdependent latent variables. Although these models exhibit superior performance and enable richer latent representations, we show that they incur diminishing returns: adding more stochastic layers to an already very deep model yields small predictive improvement while substantially increasing the inference and training time. Moreover, the architecture for this class of models favors local interactions among the latent variables between neighboring layers when designing the conditioning factors of the involved distributions. This is the first work that proposes attention mechanisms to build more expressive variational distributions in deep probabilistic models by explicitly modeling both local and global interactions in the latent space. Specifically, we propose deep attentive variational autoencoder and test it on a variety of established datasets. We show it achieves state-of-the-art log-likelihoods while using fewer latent layers and requiring less training time than existing models. The proposed non-local inference reduces computational footprint by alleviating the need for deep hierarchies. Project code: https://github.com/ifiaposto/Deep_Attentive_VI

NeurIPS Conference 2022 Conference Paper

Exploration via Planning for Information about the Optimal Trajectory

  • Viraj Mehta
  • Ian Char
  • Joseph Abbate
  • Rory Conlin
  • Mark Boyer
  • Stefano Ermon
  • Jeff Schneider
  • Willie Neiswanger

Many potential applications of reinforcement learning (RL) are stymied by the large numbers of samples required to learn an effective policy. This is especially true when applying RL to real-world control tasks, e. g. in the sciences or robotics, where executing a policy in the environment is costly. In popular RL algorithms, agents typically explore either by adding stochasticity to a reward-maximizing policy or by attempting to gather maximal information about environment dynamics without taking the given task into account. In this work, we develop a method that allows us to plan for exploration while taking both the task and the current knowledge about the dynamics into account. The key insight to our approach is to plan an action sequence that maximizes the expected information gain about the optimal trajectory for the task at hand. We demonstrate that our method learns strong policies with 2x fewer samples than strong exploration baselines and 200x fewer samples than model free methods on a diverse set of low-to-medium dimensional control tasks in both the open-loop and closed-loop control settings.

NeurIPS Conference 2021 Conference Paper

Beyond Pinball Loss: Quantile Methods for Calibrated Uncertainty Quantification

  • Youngseog Chung
  • Willie Neiswanger
  • Ian Char
  • Jeff Schneider

Among the many ways of quantifying uncertainty in a regression setting, specifying the full quantile function is attractive, as quantiles are amenable to interpretation and evaluation. A model that predicts the true conditional quantiles for each input, at all quantile levels, presents a correct and efficient representation of the underlying uncertainty. To achieve this, many current quantile-based methods focus on optimizing the pinball loss. However, this loss restricts the scope of applicable regression models, limits the ability to target many desirable properties (e. g. calibration, sharpness, centered intervals), and may produce poor conditional quantiles. In this work, we develop new quantile methods that address these shortcomings. In particular, we propose methods that can apply to any class of regression model, select an explicit balance between calibration and sharpness, optimize for calibration of centered intervals, and produce more accurate conditional quantiles. We provide a thorough experimental evaluation of our methods, which includes a high dimensional uncertainty quantification task in nuclear fusion.

NeurIPS Conference 2019 Conference Paper

Offline Contextual Bayesian Optimization

  • Ian Char
  • Youngseog Chung
  • Willie Neiswanger
  • Kirthevasan Kandasamy
  • Andrew Nelson
  • Mark Boyer
  • Egemen Kolemen
  • Jeff Schneider

In black-box optimization, an agent repeatedly chooses a configuration to test, so as to find an optimal configuration. In many practical problems of interest, one would like to optimize several systems, or tasks'', simultaneously; however, in most of these scenarios the current task is determined by nature. In this work, we explore the offline'' case in which one is able to bypass nature and choose the next task to evaluate (e. g. via a simulator). Because some tasks may be easier to optimize and others may be more critical, it is crucial to leverage algorithms that not only consider which configurations to try next, but also which tasks to make evaluations for. In this work, we describe a theoretically grounded Bayesian optimization method to tackle this problem. We also demonstrate that if the model of the reward structure does a poor job of capturing variation in difficulty between tasks, then algorithms that actively pick tasks for evaluation may end up doing more harm than good. Following this, we show how our approach can be used for real world applications in science and engineering, including optimizing tokamak controls for nuclear fusion.

v2026.09.13