Author name cluster

Hugues Van Assel

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

5 papers

1 author row

TMLR Journal 2025 Journal Article

Distributional Reduction: Unifying Dimensionality Reduction and Clustering with Gromov-Wasserstein

Hugues Van Assel
Cédric Vincent-Cuaz
Nicolas Courty
Rémi Flamary
Pascal Frossard
Titouan Vayer

Unsupervised learning aims to capture the underlying structure of potentially large and high-dimensional datasets. Traditionally, this involves using dimensionality reduction (DR) methods to project data onto lower-dimensional spaces or organizing points into meaningful clusters (clustering). In this work, we revisit these approaches under the lens of optimal transport and exhibit relationships with the Gromov-Wasserstein problem. This unveils a new general framework, called distributional reduction, that recovers DR and clustering as special cases and allows addressing them jointly within a single optimization problem. We empirically demonstrate its relevance to the identification of low-dimensional prototypes representing data at different scales, across multiple image and genomic datasets.

PDF Details

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Ditch the Denoiser: Emergence of Noise Robustness in Self-Supervised Learning from Data Curriculum

Wenquan Lu
Jiaqi Zhang
Hugues Van Assel
Randall Balestriero

Self-Supervised Learning (SSL) has become a powerful solution to extract rich representations from unlabeled data. Yet, SSL research is mostly focused on clean, curated and high-quality datasets. As a result, applying SSL on noisy data remains a challenge, despite being crucial to applications such as astrophysics, medical imaging, geophysics or finance. In this work, we present a fully self-supervised framework that enables noise-robust representation learning without requiring a denoiser at inference or downstream fine-tuning. Our method first trains an SSL denoiser on noisy data, then uses it to construct a denoised-to-noisy data curriculum (i. e. , training first on denoised, then noisy samples) for pretraining a SSL backbone (e. g. , DINOv2), combined with a teacher-guided regularization that anchors noisy embeddings to their denoised counterparts. This process encourages the model to internalize noise robustness. Notably, the denoiser can be discarded after pretraining, simplifying deployment. On ImageNet-1k with ViT-B under extreme Gaussian noise ($\sigma=255$, SNR = 0. 72 dB), our method improves linear probing accuracy by 4. 8\% over DINOv2, demonstrating that denoiser-free robustness can emerge from noise-aware pretraining. The code is available at https: //github. com/wenquanlu/noisy_dinov2.

PDF Details

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Joint‑Embedding vs Reconstruction: Provable Benefits of Latent Space Prediction for Self‑Supervised Learning

Hugues Van Assel
Mark Ibrahim
Tommaso Biancalani
Aviv Regev
Randall Balestriero

Reconstruction and joint-embedding have emerged as two leading paradigms in Self‑Supervised Learning (SSL). Reconstruction methods focus on recovering the original sample from a different view in input space. On the other hand, joint-embedding methods align the representations of different views in latent space. Both approaches offer compelling advantages, yet practitioners lack clear guidelines for choosing between them. In this work, we unveil the core mechanisms that distinguish each paradigm. By leveraging closed-form solutions for both approaches, we precisely characterize how the view generation process, e. g. data augmentation, impacts the learned representations. We then demonstrate that, unlike supervised learning, both SSL paradigms require a minimal alignment between augmentations and irrelevant features to achieve asymptotic optimality with increasing sample size. Our findings indicate that in scenarios where these irrelevant features have a large magnitude, joint-embedding methods are preferable because they impose a strictly weaker alignment condition compared to reconstruction-based methods. These results not only clarify the trade-offs between the two paradigms but also substantiate the empirical success of joint-embedding approaches on real-world challenging datasets.

PDF Details

NeurIPS Conference 2023 Conference Paper

SNEkhorn: Dimension Reduction with Symmetric Entropic Affinities

Hugues Van Assel
Titouan Vayer
Rémi Flamary
Nicolas Courty

Many approaches in machine learning rely on a weighted graph to encode thesimilarities between samples in a dataset. Entropic affinities (EAs), which are notably used in the popular Dimensionality Reduction (DR) algorithm t-SNE, are particular instances of such graphs. To ensure robustness to heterogeneous sampling densities, EAs assign a kernel bandwidth parameter to every sample in such a way that the entropy of each row in the affinity matrix is kept constant at a specific value, whose exponential is known as perplexity. EAs are inherently asymmetric and row-wise stochastic, but they are used in DR approaches after undergoing heuristic symmetrization methods that violate both the row-wise constant entropy and stochasticity properties. In this work, we uncover a novel characterization of EA as an optimal transport problem, allowing a natural symmetrization that can be computed efficiently using dual ascent. The corresponding novel affinity matrix derives advantages from symmetric doubly stochastic normalization in terms of clustering performance, while also effectively controlling the entropy of each row thus making it particularly robust to varying noise levels. Following, we present a new DR algorithm, SNEkhorn, that leverages this new affinity matrix. We show its clear superiority to state-of-the-art approaches with several indicators on both synthetic and real-world datasets.

PDF Details

NeurIPS Conference 2022 Conference Paper

A Probabilistic Graph Coupling View of Dimension Reduction

Hugues Van Assel
Thibault Espinasse
Julien Chiquet
Franck Picard

Most popular dimension reduction (DR) methods like t-SNE and UMAP are based on minimizing a cost between input and latent pairwise similarities. Though widely used, these approaches lack clear probabilistic foundations to enable a full understanding of their properties and limitations. To that extent, we introduce a unifying statistical framework based on the coupling of hidden graphs using cross entropy. These graphs induce a Markov random field dependency structure among the observations in both input and latent spaces. We show that existing pairwise similarity DR methods can be retrieved from our framework with particular choices of priors for the graphs. Moreover this reveals that these methods relying on shift-invariant kernels suffer from a statistical degeneracy that explains poor performances in conserving coarse-grain dependencies. New links are drawn with PCA which appears as a non-degenerate graph coupling model.

PDF Details