Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Hong Chen 0001

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

3 papers
1 author row

Possible papers

3

ICLR Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Streamlining Redundant Layers to Compress Large Language Models

  • Xiaodong Chen
  • Yuxuan Hu
  • Jing Zhang 0001
  • Yanling Wang
  • Cuiping Li 0001
  • Hong Chen 0001

This paper introduces LLM-Streamline, a pioneer work on layer pruning for large language models (LLMs). It is based on the observation that different layers have varying impacts on hidden states, enabling the identification of less important layers to be pruned. LLM-Streamline comprises two parts: layer pruning, which removes consecutive layers with the lowest importance based on target sparsity, and layer replacement, a novel module that trains a lightweight network to replace the pruned layers to mitigate performance loss. Additionally, a new metric called stability is proposed to address the limitations of the widely used accuracy metric in evaluating model compression. Experiments show that LLM-Streamline outperforms both previous and concurrent state-of-the-art pruning methods in terms of both performance and training efficiency. Our code is available at \href{https://github.com/RUCKBReasoning/LLM-Streamline}{this repository}.

ICML Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Unsupervised Learning for Class Distribution Mismatch

  • Pan Du 0002
  • Wangbo Zhao
  • Xinai Lu
  • Nian Liu
  • Zhikai Li
  • Chaoyu Gong
  • Suyun Zhao
  • Hong Chen 0001

Class distribution mismatch (CDM) refers to the discrepancy between class distributions in training data and target tasks. Previous methods address this by designing classifiers to categorize classes known during training, while grouping unknown or new classes into an "other" category. However, they focus on semi-supervised scenarios and heavily rely on labeled data, limiting their applicability and performance. To address this, we propose Unsupervised Learning for Class Distribution Mismatch (UCDM), which constructs positive-negative pairs from unlabeled data for classifier training. Our approach randomly samples images and uses a diffusion model to add or erase semantic classes, synthesizing diverse training pairs. Additionally, we introduce a confidence-based labeling mechanism that iteratively assigns pseudo-labels to valuable real-world data and incorporates them into the training process. Extensive experiments on three datasets demonstrate UCDM’s superiority over previous semi-supervised methods. Specifically, with a 60% mismatch proportion on Tiny-ImageNet dataset, our approach, without relying on labeled data, surpasses OpenMatch (with 40 labels per class) by 35. 1%, 63. 7%, and 72. 5% in classifying known, unknown, and new classes.

ECAI Conference 2020 Conference Paper

Partial Label Learning via Generative Adversarial Nets

  • Yabin Zhang 0005
  • Guang Yang 0040
  • Suyun Zhao
  • Peng Ni
  • Hairong Lian
  • Hong Chen 0001
  • Cuiping Li 0001

Partial label learning (PLL) is a weakly supervised learning framework, in which each sample is provided with multiple candidate labels while only one of them is correct. Most of the existing methods are designed based on some conventional machine learning techniques, from kNN to SVM and logistic regression. Till now, it is still unclear whether we can use adversarial networks to solve partial label problems. This paper gives a positive answer to this question for the first time. We are the first to solve partial label learning with the network structure of CGAN combine SSGAN. In partial label learning with adversarial networks, it is interesting to find that some fake samples close to real sample distribution are generated, and then all these samples gradually promote discriminator to disambiguate the candidate labels of real samples. We give theoretical justifications of PL-GAN on challenging partial label data classification. Numerical experiments on artificial and real-world partial label datasets show that our approach significantly outperforms state-of-the-art counter-parts.

v2026.09.13