Author name cluster

Gust Verbruggen

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

4 papers

2 author rows

ICLR Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Execution-guided within-prompt search for programming-by-example

Gust Verbruggen
Ashish Tiwari 0001
Mukul Singh
Vu Le 0002
Sumit Gulwani

Large language models (LLMs) can generate code from examples without being limited to a DSL, but they lack search, as sampled programs are independent. In this paper, we use an LLM as a policy that generates lines of code and then join these lines of code to let the LLM implicitly estimate the value of each of these lines in its next iteration. We further guide the policy and value estimation by executing each line and annotating it with its results on the given examples. This allows us to search for programs within a single (expanding) prompt until a sound program is found, by letting the policy reason in both the syntactic (code) and semantic (execution) space. We evaluate within-prompt search on straight-line Python code generation using five benchmarks across different domains (strings, lists, and arbitrary Python programming problems). We show that the model uses the execution results to guide the search and that within-prompt search performs well at low token budgets. We also analyze how the model behaves as a policy and value, show that it can parallelize the search, and that it can implicitly backtrack over earlier generations.

Details

AAAI Conference 2024 System Paper

EmFORE: Learning Email Folder Classification Rules by Demonstration

Mukul Singh
Gust Verbruggen
José Cambronero
Vu Le
Sumit Gulwani

Tools that help with email folder management are limited, as users have to manually write rules to assign emails to folders. We present EMFORE, an iterative learning system that automatically learns and updates such rules from observations. EMFORE is fast enough to suggest and update rules in real time and suppresses mails with low confidence to reduce the number of false positives. EMFORE can use different rule grammars, and thus be adapted to different clients, without changing the user experience. Previous methods do not learn rules, require complete retraining or multiple new examples after making a mistake, and do not distinguish between inbox and other folders. EMFORE learns rules incrementally and can make the neutral decision of leaving emails in the inbox, making it an ideal candidate for integration in email clients.

PDF Details DOI

AAAI Conference 2024 Conference Paper

FLAME: A Small Language Model for Spreadsheet Formulas

Harshit Joshi
Abishai Ebenezer
José Cambronero Sanchez
Sumit Gulwani
Aditya Kanade
Vu Le
Ivan Radiček
Gust Verbruggen

Spreadsheets are a vital tool for end-user data management. Using large language models for formula authoring assistance in these environments can be difficult, as these models are expensive to train and challenging to deploy due to their size (up to billions of parameters). We present FLAME, a transformer-based model trained exclusively on Excel formulas that leverages domain insights to achieve competitive performance while being substantially smaller (60M parameters) and training on two orders of magnitude less data. We curate a training dataset using sketch deduplication, introduce an Excel-specific formula tokenizer, and use domain-specific versions of masked span prediction and noisy auto-encoding as pre-training objectives. We evaluate FLAME on formula repair, formula completion, and similarity-based formula retrieval. FLAME can outperform much larger models, such as the Davinci (175B) and Cushman (12B) variants of Codex and CodeT5 (220M), in 10 of 14 evaluation settings for the repair and completion tasks. For formula retrieval, FLAME outperforms CodeT5, CodeBERT, and GraphCodeBERT.

PDF Details DOI

AAAI Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Repair Is Nearly Generation: Multilingual Program Repair with LLMs

Harshit Joshi
José Cambronero Sanchez
Sumit Gulwani
Vu Le
Gust Verbruggen
Ivan Radiček

Most programmers make mistakes when writing code. Some of these mistakes are small and require few edits to the original program – a class of errors recently termed last mile mistakes. These errors break the flow for experienced developers and can stump novice programmers. Existing automated repair techniques targeting this class of errors are language-specific and do not easily carry over to new languages. Transferring symbolic approaches requires substantial engineering and neural approaches require data and retraining. We introduce RING, a multilingual repair engine powered by a large language model trained on code (LLMC) such as Codex. Such a multilingual engine enables a flipped model for programming assistance, one where the programmer writes code and the AI assistance suggests fixes, compared to traditional code suggestion technology. Taking inspiration from the way programmers manually fix bugs, we show that a prompt-based strategy that conceptualizes repair as localization, transformation, and candidate ranking, can successfully repair programs in multiple languages with minimal effort. We present the first results for such a multilingual repair engine by evaluating on 6 different languages and comparing performance to language-specific repair engines. We show that RING can outperform language-specific repair engines for three of these languages.

PDF Details DOI