Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Gert Lanckriet

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

9 papers
1 author row

Possible papers

9

NeurIPS Conference 2012 Conference Paper

Non-linear Metric Learning

  • Dor Kedem
  • Stephen Tyree
  • Fei Sha
  • Gert Lanckriet
  • Kilian Weinberger

In this paper, we introduce two novel metric learning algorithms, χ2-LMNN and GB-LMNN, which are explicitly designed to be non-linear and easy-to-use. The two approaches achieve this goal in fundamentally different ways: χ2-LMNN inherits the computational benefits of a linear mapping from linear metric learning, but uses a non-linear χ2-distance to explicitly capture similarities within histogram data sets; GB-LMNN applies gradient-boosting to learn non-linear mappings directly in function space and takes advantage of this approach's robustness, speed, parallelizability and insensitivity towards the single additional hyper-parameter. On various benchmark data sets, we demonstrate these methods not only match the current state-of-the-art in terms of kNN classification error, but in the case of χ2-LMNN, obtain best results in 19 out of 20 learning settings.

NeurIPS Conference 2012 Conference Paper

The variational hierarchical EM algorithm for clustering hidden Markov models

  • Emanuele Coviello
  • Gert Lanckriet
  • Antoni Chan

In this paper, we derive a novel algorithm to cluster hidden Markov models (HMMs) according to their probability distributions. We propose a variational hierarchical EM algorithm that i) clusters a given collection of HMMs into groups of HMMs that are similar, in terms of the distributions they represent, and ii) characterizes each group by a ``cluster center'', i. e. , a novel HMM that is representative for the group. We illustrate the benefits of the proposed algorithm on hierarchical clustering of motion capture sequences as well as on automatic music tagging.

NeurIPS Conference 2011 Conference Paper

Learning in Hilbert vs. Banach Spaces: A Measure Embedding Viewpoint

  • Kenji Fukumizu
  • Gert Lanckriet
  • Bharath Sriperumbudur

The goal of this paper is to investigate the advantages and disadvantages of learning in Banach spaces over Hilbert spaces. While many works have been carried out in generalizing Hilbert methods to Banach spaces, in this paper, we consider the simple problem of learning a Parzen window classifier in a reproducing kernel Banach space (RKBS)---which is closely related to the notion of embedding probability measures into an RKBS---in order to carefully understand its pros and cons over the Hilbert space classifier. We show that while this generalization yields richer distance measures on probabilities compared to its Hilbert space counterpart, it however suffers from serious computational drawback limiting its practical applicability, which therefore demonstrates the need for developing efficient learning algorithms in Banach spaces.

JMLR Journal 2011 Journal Article

Learning Multi-modal Similarity

  • Brian McFee
  • Gert Lanckriet

In many applications involving multi-media data, the definition of similarity between items is integral to several key tasks, including nearest-neighbor retrieval, classification, and recommendation. Data in such regimes typically exhibits multiple modalities, such as acoustic and visual content of video. Integrating such heterogeneous data to form a holistic similarity space is therefore a key challenge to be overcome in many real-world applications. We present a novel multiple kernel learning technique for integrating heterogeneous data into a single, unified similarity space. Our algorithm learns an optimal ensemble of kernel transformations which conform to measurements of human perceptual similarity, as expressed by relative comparisons. To cope with the ubiquitous problems of subjectivity and inconsistency in multi-media similarity, we develop graph-based techniques to filter similarity measurements, resulting in a simplified and robust training procedure. [abs] [ pdf ][ bib ] &copy JMLR 2011. ( edit, beta )

NeurIPS Conference 2009 Conference Paper

Kernel Choice and Classifiability for RKHS Embeddings of Probability Distributions

  • Kenji Fukumizu
  • Arthur Gretton
  • Gert Lanckriet
  • Bernhard Schölkopf
  • Bharath Sriperumbudur

Embeddings of probability measures into reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces have been proposed as a straightforward and practical means of representing and comparing probabilities. In particular, the distance between embeddings (the maximum mean discrepancy, or MMD) has several key advantages over many classical metrics on distributions, namely easy computability, fast convergence and low bias of finite sample estimates. An important requirement of the embedding RKHS is that it be characteristic: in this case, the MMD between two distributions is zero if and only if the distributions coincide. Three new results on the MMD are introduced in the present study. First, it is established that MMD corresponds to the optimal risk of a kernel classifier, thus forming a natural link between the distance between distributions and their ease of classification. An important consequence is that a kernel must be characteristic to guarantee classifiability between distributions in the RKHS. Second, the class of characteristic kernels is broadened to incorporate all strictly positive definite kernels: these include non-translation invariant kernels and kernels on non-compact domains. Third, a generalization of the MMD is proposed for families of kernels, as the supremum over MMDs on a class of kernels (for instance the Gaussian kernels with different bandwidths). This extension is necessary to obtain a single distance measure if a large selection or class of characteristic kernels is potentially appropriate. This generalization is reasonable, given that it corresponds to the problem of learning the kernel by minimizing the risk of the corresponding kernel classifier. The generalized MMD is shown to have consistent finite sample estimates, and its performance is demonstrated on a homogeneity testing example.

NeurIPS Conference 2009 Conference Paper

On the Convergence of the Concave-Convex Procedure

  • Gert Lanckriet
  • Bharath Sriperumbudur

The concave-convex procedure (CCCP) is a majorization-minimization algorithm that solves d. c. (difference of convex functions) programs as a sequence of convex programs. In machine learning, CCCP is extensively used in many learning algorithms like sparse support vector machines (SVMs), transductive SVMs, sparse principal component analysis, etc. Though widely used in many applications, the convergence behavior of CCCP has not gotten a lot of specific attention. Yuille and Rangarajan analyzed its convergence in their original paper, however, we believe the analysis is not complete. Although the convergence of CCCP can be derived from the convergence of the d. c. algorithm (DCA), their proof is more specialized and technical than actually required for the specific case of CCCP. In this paper, we follow a different reasoning and show how Zangwills global convergence theory of iterative algorithms provides a natural framework to prove the convergence of CCCP, allowing a more elegant and simple proof. This underlines Zangwills theory as a powerful and general framework to deal with the convergence issues of iterative algorithms, after also being used to prove the convergence of algorithms like expectation-maximization, generalized alternating minimization, etc. In this paper, we provide a rigorous analysis of the convergence of CCCP by addressing these questions: (i) When does CCCP find a local minimum or a stationary point of the d. c. program under consideration? (ii) When does the sequence generated by CCCP converge? We also present an open problem on the issue of local convergence of CCCP.

NeurIPS Conference 2004 Conference Paper

A Direct Formulation for Sparse PCA Using Semidefinite Programming

  • Alexandre d'Aspremont
  • Laurent Ghaoui
  • Michael Jordan
  • Gert Lanckriet

We examine the problem of approximating, in the Frobenius-norm sense, a positive, semidefinite symmetric matrix by a rank-one matrix, with an upper bound on the cardinality of its eigenvector. The problem arises in the decomposition of a covariance matrix into sparse factors, and has wide applications ranging from biology to finance. We use a modifica- tion of the classical variational representation of the largest eigenvalue of a symmetric matrix, where cardinality is constrained, and derive a semidefinite programming based relaxation for our problem.

NeurIPS Conference 2002 Conference Paper

Robust Novelty Detection with Single-Class MPM

  • Laurent Ghaoui
  • Michael Jordan
  • Gert Lanckriet

the "single-class minimax probabil(cid: 173) In this paper we consider the problem of novelty detection, pre(cid: 173) senting an algorithm that aims to find a minimal region in input space containing a fraction 0: of the probability mass underlying a data set. This algorithm- ity machine (MPM)" - is built on a distribution-free methodology that minimizes the worst-case probability of a data point falling outside of a convex set, given only the mean and covariance matrix of the distribution and making no further distributional assump(cid: 173) tions. We present a robust approach to estimating the mean and covariance matrix within the general two-class MPM setting, and show how this approach specializes to the single-class problem. We provide empirical results comparing the single-class MPM to the single-class SVM and a two-class SVM method.

NeurIPS Conference 2001 Conference Paper

Minimax Probability Machine

  • Gert Lanckriet
  • Laurent Ghaoui
  • Chiranjib Bhattacharyya
  • Michael Jordan

When constructing a classifier, the probability of correct classifi(cid: 173) cation of future data points should be maximized. In the current paper this desideratum is translated in a very direct way into an optimization problem, which is solved using methods from con(cid: 173) vex optimization. We also show how to exploit Mercer kernels in this setting to obtain nonlinear decision boundaries. A worst-case bound on the probability of misclassification of future data is ob(cid: 173) tained explicitly.

v2026.09.13