Author name cluster

Gautam Chandrasekaran

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

6 papers

2 author rows

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Learning Juntas under Markov Random Fields

Gautam Chandrasekaran
Adam Klivans

We give an algorithm for learning $O(\log n)$ juntas in polynomial-time with respect to Markov Random Fields (MRFs) in a smoothed analysis framework, where only the external field has been randomly perturbed. This is a broad generalization of the work of Kalai and Teng, who gave an algorithm that succeeded with respect to smoothed *product* distributions (i. e. , MRFs whose dependency graph has no edges). Our algorithm has two phases: (1) an unsupervised structure learning phase and (2) a greedy supervised learning algorithm. This is the first example where algorithms for learning the structure of undirected graphical models have downstream applications to supervised learning.

PDF Details

ICLR Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Learning Neural Networks with Distribution Shift: Efficiently Certifiable Guarantees

Gautam Chandrasekaran
Adam R. Klivans
Lin Lin Lee
Konstantinos Stavropoulos

We give the first provably efficient algorithms for learning neural networks with respect to distribution shift. We work in the Testable Learning with Distribution Shift framework (TDS learning) of Klivans et al. (2024), where the learner receives labeled examples from a training distribution and unlabeled examples from a test distribution and must either output a hypothesis with low test error or reject if distribution shift is detected. No assumptions are made on the test distribution. All prior work in TDS learning focuses on classification, while here we must handle the setting of nonconvex regression. Our results apply to real-valued networks with arbitrary Lipschitz activations and work whenever the training distribution has strictly sub-exponential tails. For training distributions that are bounded and hypercontractive, we give a fully polynomial-time algorithm for TDS learning one hidden-layer networks with sigmoid activations. We achieve this by importing classical kernel methods into the TDS framework using data-dependent feature maps and a type of kernel matrix that couples samples from both train and test distributions.

Details

STOC Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Learning the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick Model Even at Low Temperature

Gautam Chandrasekaran
Adam R. Klivans

We consider the fundamental problem of learning the parameters of an undirected graphical model or Markov Random Field (MRF) in the setting where the edge weights are chosen at random. For Ising models, we show that a multiplicative-weight update algorithm due to Klivans and Meka learns the parameters in polynomial time for any inverse temperature β ≤ √log n . This immediately yields an algorithm for learning the Sherrington-Kirkpatrick (SK) model beyond the high-temperature regime of β < 1. Prior work breaks down at β = 1 and requires heavy machinery from statistical physics or functional inequalities. In contrast, our analysis is relatively simple and uses only subgaussian concentration. Our results extend to MRFs of higher order (such as pure p -spin models), where even results in the high-temperature regime were not known.

Details

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Efficient Discrepancy Testing for Learning with Distribution Shift

Gautam Chandrasekaran
Adam R. Klivans
Vasilis Kontonis
Konstantinos Stavropoulos
Arsen Vasilyan

A fundamental notion of distance between train and test distributions from the field of domain adaptation is discrepancy distance. While in general hard to compute, here we provide the first set of provably efficient algorithms for testing localized discrepancy distance, where discrepancy is computed with respect to a fixed output classifier. These results imply a broad set of new, efficient learning algorithms in the recently introduced model of Testable Learning with Distribution Shift (TDS learning) due to Klivans et al. (2023). Our approach generalizes and improves all prior work on TDS learning: (1) we obtain universal learners that succeed simultaneously for large classes of test distributions, (2) achieve near-optimal error rates, and (3) give exponential improvements for constant depth circuits. Our methods further extend to semi-parametric settings and imply the first positive results for low-dimensional convex sets. Additionally, we separate learning and testing phases and obtain algorithms that run in fully polynomial time at test time.

PDF Details DOI

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Learning Noisy Halfspaces with a Margin: Massart is No Harder than Random

Gautam Chandrasekaran
Vasilis Kontonis
Konstantinos Stavropoulos
Kevin Tian

We study the problem of PAC learning $\gamma$-margin halfspaces with Massart noise. We propose a simple proper learning algorithm, the Perspectron, that has sample complexity $\widetilde{O}((\epsilon\gamma)^{-2})$ and achieves classification error at most $\eta+\epsilon$ where $\eta$ is the Massart noise rate. Prior works (DGT19, CKMY20) came with worse sample complexity guarantees (in both $\epsilon$ and $\gamma$) or could only handle random classification noise (DDKWZ23, KITBMV23)--- a much milder noise assumption. We also show that our results extend to the more challenging setting of learning generalized linear models with a known link function under Massart noise, achieving a similar sample complexity to the halfspace case. This significantly improves upon the prior state-of-the-art in this setting due to CKMY20, who introduced this model.

PDF Details DOI

UAI Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Learning in online MDPs: is there a price for handling the communicating case?

Gautam Chandrasekaran
Ambuj Tewari

It is a remarkable fact that the same $O(\sqrt{T})$ regret rate can be achieved in both the Experts Problem and the Adversarial Multi-Armed Bandit problem albeit with a worse dependence on number of actions in the latter case. In contrast, it has been shown that handling online MDPs with communicating structure and bandit information incurs $\Omega(T^{2/3})$ regret even in the case of deterministic transitions. Is this the price we pay for handling communicating structure or is it because we also have bandit feedback? In this paper we show that with full information, online MDPs can still be learned at an $O(\sqrt{T})$ rate even in the presence of communicating structure. We first show this by proposing an efficient follow the perturbed leader (FPL) algorithm for the deterministic transition case. We then extend our scope to consider stochastic transitions where we first give an inefficient $O(\sqrt{T})$-regret algorithm (with a mild additional condition on the dynamics). Then we show how to achieve $O\left(\sqrt{\frac{T}{\alpha}}\right)$ regret rate using an oracle-efficient algorithm but with the additional restriction that the starting state distribution has mass at least $\alpha$ on each state.

Details