Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Frederik B. Laun

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

3 papers
1 author row

Possible papers

3

YNIMG Journal 2021 Journal Article

The traveling heads 2.0: Multicenter reproducibility of quantitative imaging methods at 7 Tesla

  • Maximilian N. Voelker
  • Oliver Kraff
  • Steffen Goerke
  • Frederik B. Laun
  • Jannis Hanspach
  • Kerrin J. Pine
  • Philipp Ehses
  • Moritz Zaiss

OBJECT: This study evaluates inter-site and intra-site reproducibility at ten different 7 T sites for quantitative brain imaging. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two subjects - termed the "traveling heads" - were imaged at ten different 7 T sites with a harmonized quantitative brain MR imaging protocol. In conjunction with the system calibration, MP2RAGE, QSM, CEST and multi-parametric mapping/relaxometry were examined. RESULTS: Quantitative measurements with MP2RAGE showed very high reproducibility across sites and subjects, and errors were in concordance with previous results and other field strengths. QSM had high inter-site reproducibility for relevant subcortical volumes. CEST imaging revealed systematic differences between the sites, but reproducibility was comparable to results in the literature. Relaxometry had also very high agreement between sites, but due to the high sensitivity, differences caused by different applications of the B1 calibration of the two RF coil types used were observed. CONCLUSION: Our results show that quantitative brain imaging can be performed with high reproducibility at 7 T and with similar reliability as found at 3 T for multicenter studies of the supratentorial brain.

YNIMG Journal 2014 Journal Article

Methodological considerations on tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS)

  • Michael Bach
  • Frederik B. Laun
  • Alexander Leemans
  • Chantal M.W. Tax
  • Geert J. Biessels
  • Bram Stieltjes
  • Klaus H. Maier-Hein

Having gained a tremendous amount of popularity since its introduction in 2006, tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) can now be considered as the standard approach for voxel-based analysis (VBA) of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data. Aiming to improve the sensitivity, objectivity, and interpretability of multi-subject DTI studies, TBSS includes a skeletonization step that alleviates residual image misalignment and obviates the need for data smoothing. Although TBSS represents an elegant and user-friendly framework that tackles numerous concerns existing in conventional VBA methods, it has limitations of its own, some of which have already been detailed in recent literature. In this work, we present general methodological considerations on TBSS and report on pitfalls that have not been described previously. In particular, we have identified specific assumptions of TBSS that may not be satisfied under typical conditions. Moreover, we demonstrate that the existence of such violations can severely affect the reliability of TBSS results. With TBSS being used increasingly, it is of paramount importance to acquaint TBSS users with these concerns, such that a well-informed decision can be made as to whether and how to pursue a TBSS analysis. Finally, in addition to raising awareness by providing our new insights, we provide constructive suggestions that could improve the validity and increase the impact of TBSS drastically.

YNIMG Journal 2010 Journal Article

Opportunities and pitfalls in the quantification of fiber integrity: What can we gain from Q-ball imaging?

  • Klaus H. Fritzsche
  • Frederik B. Laun
  • Hans-Peter Meinzer
  • Bram Stieltjes

The quantification of fiber integrity is central to the clinical application of diffusion imaging. Compared to diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), Q-ball imaging (QBI) allows for the depiction of multiple fiber directions within a voxel. However, this advantage has not yet been shown to translate directly to superior quantification of fiber integrity. Furthermore, recent developments in QBI reconstruction with solid angle consideration have led to sharper and intrinsically normalized orientation distribution functions. The implications of this technique on quantification are also unknown. To investigate this, the generalized fractional anisotropy (GFA) from the original and the more recent QBI reconstruction scheme and the DTI derived fractional anisotropy (FA) were evaluated comparatively using Monte Carlo simulations and real MRI measurements of crossing fiber phantoms. Contrast-to-noise ratio, accuracy, independence of the acquisition setup and the relation of single fiber anisotropies to measured anisotropy in crossings were assessed. In homogeneous single-fiber regions at b-values around 1000 s/mm2, the FA performed best. While the original QBI reconstruction does not show a clear advantage even at higher b-values and in crossing regions, the new reconstruction scheme yields superior properties and is recommended for quantification at higher b-values and especially in regions of heterogeneous fiber configuration.