Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Frédéric Berdoz

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

4 papers
1 author row

Possible papers

4

AAAI Conference 2026 Conference Paper

Steering Pretrained Drafters During Speculative Decoding

  • Frédéric Berdoz
  • Peer Rheinboldt
  • Roger Wattenhofer

Speculative decoding accelerates language model inference by separating generation into fast drafting and parallel verification. Its main limitation is drafter–verifier misalignment, which limits token acceptance and reduces overall effectiveness. While small drafting heads trained from scratch compensate with speed, they struggle when verification dominates latency or when inputs are out of distribution. In contrast, pretrained drafters, though slower, achieve higher acceptance rates thanks to stronger standalone generation capabilities, making them competitive when drafting latency is negligible relative to verification or communication overhead. In this work, we aim to improve the acceptance rates of pretrained drafters by introducing a lightweight dynamic alignment mechanism: a steering vector computed from the verifier’s hidden states and injected into the pretrained drafter. Compared to existing offline alignment methods such as distillation, our approach boosts the number of accepted tokens by up to 35% under standard sampling and 22% under greedy sampling, all while incurring negligible computational overhead. Importantly, our approach can be retrofitted to existing architectures and pretrained models, enabling rapid adoption.

AAAI Conference 2026 Conference Paper

Text-to-Scene with Large Reasoning Models

  • Frédéric Berdoz
  • Luca A Lanzendörfer
  • Nick Tuninga
  • Roger Wattenhofer

Prompt-driven scene synthesis allows users to generate complete 3D environments from textual descriptions. Current text-to-scene methods often struggle with complex geometries and object transformations, and tend to show weak adherence to complex instructions. We address these limitations by introducing Reason-3D, a text-to-scene model powered by large reasoning models (LRMs). Reason-3D integrates object retrieval using captions covering physical, functional, and contextual attributes. Reason-3D then places the selected objects based on implicit and explicit layout constraints, and refines their positions with collision-aware spatial reasoning. Evaluated on instructions ranging from simple to complex indoor configurations, Reason-3D significantly outperforms previous methods in human-rated visual fidelity, adherence to constraints, and asset retrieval quality. Beyond its contribution to the field of text-to-scene generation, our work showcases the advanced spatial reasoning abilities of modern LRMs. Additionally, we release the codebase to further the research in object retrieval and placement with LRMs.

IJCAI Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Recommender Systems for Democracy: Toward Adversarial Robustness in Voting Advice Applications

  • Frédéric Berdoz
  • Dustin Brunner
  • Yann Vonlanthen
  • Roger Wattenhofer

Voting advice applications (VAAs) help millions of voters understand which political parties or candidates best align with their views. This paper explores the potential risks these applications pose to the democratic process when targeted by adversarial entities. In particular, we expose 11 manipulation strategies and measure their impact using data from Switzerland’s primary VAA, Smartvote, collected during the last two national elections. We find that altering application parameters, such as the matching method, can shift a party’s recommendation frequency by up to 105%. Cherry-picking questionnaire items can increase party recommendation frequency by over 261%, while subtle changes to parties’ or candidates’ responses can lead to a 248% increase. To address these vulnerabilities, we propose adversarial robustness properties VAAs should satisfy, introduce empirical metrics for assessing the resilience of various matching methods, and suggest possible avenues for research toward mitigating the effect of manipulation. Our framework is key to ensuring secure and reliable AI-based VAAs poised to emerge in the near future.

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Can an AI Agent Safely Run a Government? Existence of Probably Approximately Aligned Policies

  • Frédéric Berdoz
  • Roger Wattenhofer

While autonomous agents often surpass humans in their ability to handle vast and complex data, their potential misalignment (i. e. , lack of transparency regarding their true objective) has thus far hindered their use in critical applications such as social decision processes. More importantly, existing alignment methods provide no formal guarantees on the safety of such models. Drawing from utility and social choice theory, we provide a novel quantitative definition of alignment in the context of social decision-making. Building on this definition, we introduce probably approximately aligned (i. e. , near-optimal) policies, and we derive a sufficient condition for their existence. Lastly, recognizing the practical difficulty of satisfying this condition, we introduce the relaxed concept of safe (i. e. , nondestructive) policies, and we propose a simple yet robust method to safeguard the black-box policy of any autonomous agent, ensuring all its actions are verifiably safe for the society.

v2026.09.13