Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Francisco Eiras

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

8 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

8

ICLR Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Do as I do (Safely): Mitigating Task-Specific Fine-tuning Risks in Large Language Models

  • Francisco Eiras
  • Aleksandar Petrov
  • Philip H. S. Torr
  • M. Pawan Kumar
  • Adel Bibi

Recent research shows that fine-tuning on benign instruction-following data can inadvertently undo the safety alignment process and increase a model's propensity to comply with harmful queries. While instruction-following fine-tuning is important, task-specific fine-tuning-where models are trained on datasets with clear ground truth answers (e.g., multiple choice questions)-can enhance model performance on specialized downstream tasks. Understanding and mitigating safety risks in the task-specific setting remains distinct from the instruction-following context due to structural differences in the data. Our work demonstrates how malicious actors can subtly manipulate the structure of almost *any* task-specific dataset to foster significantly more dangerous model behaviors, while maintaining an appearance of innocuity and reasonable downstream task performance. To address this issue, we propose a novel mitigation strategy that mixes in safety data which *mimics* the task format and prompting style of the user data, showing this is significantly more effective and efficient than existing baselines at re-establishing safety alignment while maintaining similar task performance.

ICML Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Efficient Error Certification for Physics-Informed Neural Networks

  • Francisco Eiras
  • Adel Bibi
  • Rudy Bunel
  • Krishnamurthy Dvijotham
  • Philip H. S. Torr
  • M. Pawan Kumar

Recent work provides promising evidence that Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINN) can efficiently solve partial differential equations (PDE). However, previous works have failed to provide guarantees on the worst-case residual error of a PINN across the spatio-temporal domain - a measure akin to the tolerance of numerical solvers - focusing instead on point-wise comparisons between their solution and the ones obtained by a solver on a set of inputs. In real-world applications, one cannot consider tests on a finite set of points to be sufficient grounds for deployment, as the performance could be substantially worse on a different set. To alleviate this issue, we establish guaranteed error-based conditions for PINNs over their continuous applicability domain. To verify the extent to which they hold, we introduce $\partial$-CROWN: a general, efficient and scalable post-training framework to bound PINN residual errors. We demonstrate its effectiveness in obtaining tight certificates by applying it to two classically studied PINNs – Burgers’ and Schrödinger’s equations –, and two more challenging ones with real-world applications – the Allan-Cahn and Diffusion-Sorption equations.

ICML Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Position: Near to Mid-term Risks and Opportunities of Open-Source Generative AI

  • Francisco Eiras
  • Aleksandar Petrov
  • Bertie Vidgen
  • Christian Schröder de Witt
  • Fabio Pizzati
  • Katherine Elkins
  • Supratik Mukhopadhyay
  • Adel Bibi

In the next few years, applications of Generative AI are expected to revolutionize a number of different areas, ranging from science & medicine to education. The potential for these seismic changes has triggered a lively debate about potential risks and resulted in calls for tighter regulation, in particular from some of the major tech companies who are leading in AI development. While regulation is important, it is key that it does not put at risk the budding field of open-source Generative AI. We argue for the responsible open sourcing of generative AI models in the near and medium term. To set the stage, we first introduce an AI openness taxonomy system and apply it to 40 current large language models. We then outline differential benefits and risks of open versus closed source AI and present potential risk mitigation, ranging from best practices to calls for technical and scientific contributions. We hope that this report will add a much needed missing voice to the current public discourse on near to mid-term AI safety and other societal impact.

ICML Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Certifying Ensembles: A General Certification Theory with S-Lipschitzness

  • Aleksandar Petrov
  • Francisco Eiras
  • Amartya Sanyal
  • Philip H. S. Torr
  • Adel Bibi

Improving and guaranteeing the robustness of deep learning models has been a topic of intense research. Ensembling, which combines several classifiers to provide a better model, has been shown to be beneficial for generalisation, uncertainty estimation, calibration, and mitigating the effects of concept drift. However, the impact of ensembling on certified robustness is less well understood. In this work, we generalise Lipschitz continuity by introducing S-Lipschitz classifiers, which we use to analyse the theoretical robustness of ensembles. Our results are precise conditions when ensembles of robust classifiers are more robust than any constituent classifier, as well as conditions when they are less robust.

TMLR Journal 2022 Journal Article

ANCER: Anisotropic Certification via Sample-wise Volume Maximization

  • Francisco Eiras
  • Motasem Alfarra
  • Philip Torr
  • M. Pawan Kumar
  • Puneet K. Dokania
  • Bernard Ghanem
  • Adel Bibi

Randomized smoothing has recently emerged as an effective tool that enables certification of deep neural network classifiers at scale. All prior art on randomized smoothing has focused on isotropic $\ell_p$ certification, which has the advantage of yielding certificates that can be easily compared among isotropic methods via $\ell_p$-norm radius. However, isotropic certification limits the region that can be certified around an input to worst-case adversaries, i.e., it cannot reason about other "close", potentially large, constant prediction safe regions. To alleviate this issue, (i) we theoretically extend the isotropic randomized smoothing $\ell_1$ and $\ell_2$ certificates to their generalized anisotropic counterparts following a simplified analysis. Moreover, (ii) we propose evaluation metrics allowing for the comparison of general certificates - a certificate is superior to another if it certifies a superset region - with the quantification of each certificate through the volume of the certified region. We introduce ANCER, a framework for obtaining anisotropic certificates for a given test set sample via volume maximization. We achieve it by generalizing memory-based certification of data-dependent classifiers. Our empirical results demonstrate that ANCER achieves state-of-the-art $\ell_1$ and $\ell_2$ certified accuracy on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet in the data-dependence setting, while certifying larger regions in terms of volume, highlighting the benefits of moving away from isotropic analysis.

IROS Conference 2021 Conference Paper

Interpretable Goal Recognition in the Presence of Occluded Factors for Autonomous Vehicles

  • Josiah P. Hanna
  • Arrasy Rahman
  • Elliot Fosong
  • Francisco Eiras
  • Mihai Dobre
  • John Redford
  • Subramanian Ramamoorthy
  • Stefano V. Albrecht

Recognising the goals or intentions of observed vehicles is a key step towards predicting the long-term future behaviour of other agents in an autonomous driving scenario. When there are unseen obstacles or occluded vehicles in a scenario, goal recognition may be confounded by the effects of these unseen entities on the behaviour of observed vehicles. Existing prediction algorithms that assume rational behaviour with respect to inferred goals may fail to make accurate long-horizon predictions because they ignore the possibility that the behaviour is influenced by such unseen entities. We introduce the Goal and Occluded Factor Inference (GOFI) algorithm which bases inference on inverse-planning to jointly infer a probabilistic belief over goals and potential occluded factors. We then show how these beliefs can be integrated into Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS). We demonstrate that jointly inferring goals and occluded factors leads to more accurate beliefs with respect to the true world state and allows an agent to safely navigate several scenarios where other baselines take unsafe actions leading to collisions.

ICRA Conference 2021 Conference Paper

Interpretable Goal-based Prediction and Planning for Autonomous Driving

  • Stefano V. Albrecht
  • Cillian Brewitt
  • John Wilhelm
  • Balint Gyevnar
  • Francisco Eiras
  • Mihai Dobre
  • Subramanian Ramamoorthy

We propose an integrated prediction and planning system for autonomous driving which uses rational inverse planning to recognise the goals of other vehicles. Goal recognition informs a Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) algorithm to plan optimal maneuvers for the ego vehicle. Inverse planning and MCTS utilise a shared set of defined maneuvers and macro actions to construct plans which are explainable by means of rationality principles. Evaluation in simulations of urban driving scenarios demonstrate the system’s ability to robustly recognise the goals of other vehicles, enabling our vehicle to exploit non-trivial opportunities to significantly reduce driving times. In each scenario, we extract intuitive explanations for the predictions which justify the system’s decisions.

IROS Conference 2021 Conference Paper

PILOT: Efficient Planning by Imitation Learning and Optimisation for Safe Autonomous Driving

  • Henry Pulver
  • Francisco Eiras
  • Ludovico Carozza
  • Majd Hawasly
  • Stefano V. Albrecht
  • Subramanian Ramamoorthy

Achieving a proper balance between planning quality, safety and efficiency is a major challenge for autonomous driving. Optimisation-based motion planners are capable of producing safe, smooth and comfortable plans, but often at the cost of runtime efficiency. On the other hand, naïvely deploying trajectories produced by efficient-to-run deep imitation learning approaches might risk compromising safety. In this paper, we present PILOT a planning framework that comprises an imitation neural network followed by an efficient optimiser that actively rectifies the network’s plan, guaranteeing fulfilment of safety and comfort requirements. The objective of the efficient optimiser is the same as the objective of an expensive-to-run optimisation-based planning system that the neural network is trained offline to imitate. This efficient optimiser provides a key layer of online protection from learning failures or deficiency in out-of-distribution situations that might compromise safety or comfort. Using a state-of-the-art, runtime-intensive optimisation-based method as the expert, we demonstrate in simulated autonomous driving experiments in CARLA that PILOT achieves a seven-fold reduction in runtime when compared to the expert it imitates without sacrificing planning quality.

v2026.09.13