Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Fazl Barez

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

9 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

9

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Best-of-N Jailbreaking

  • John Hughes
  • Sara Price
  • Aengus Lynch
  • Rylan Schaeffer
  • Fazl Barez
  • Arushi Somani
  • Sanmi Koyejo
  • Henry Sleight

We introduce Best-of-N (BoN) Jailbreaking, a simple black-box algorithm that jailbreaks frontier AI systems across modalities. BoN Jailbreaking works by repeatedly sampling variations of a prompt with a combination of augmentations---such as random shuffling or capitalization for textual prompts---until a harmful response is elicited. We find that BoN Jailbreaking achieves high attack success rates (ASRs) on closed-source language models, such as 89% on GPT-4o and 78% on Claude 3. 5 Sonnet when sampling 10, 000 augmented prompts. Further, it is similarly effective at circumventing state-of-the-art open-source defenses like circuit breakers and reasoning models like o1. BoN also seamlessly extends to other modalities: it jailbreaks vision language models (VLMs) such as GPT-4o and audio language models (ALMs) like Gemini 1. 5 Pro, using modality-specific augmentations. BoN reliably improves when we sample more augmented prompts. Across all modalities, ASR, as a function of the number of samples (N), empirically follows power-law-like behavior for many orders of magnitude. BoN Jailbreaking can also be composed with other black-box algorithms for even more effective attacks---combining BoN with an optimized prefix attack achieves up to a 35% increase in ASR. Overall, our work indicates that, despite their capability, language models are sensitive to seemingly innocuous changes to inputs, which attackers can exploit across modalities.

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Emerging Risks from Embodied AI Require Urgent Policy Action

  • Jared Perlo
  • Alexander Robey
  • Fazl Barez
  • Jakob Mökander

The field of embodied AI (EAI) is rapidly advancing. Unlike virtual AI, EAI systems can exist in, learn from, reason about, and act in the physical world. With recent advances in AI and hardware research and design, EAI systems are becoming increasingly capable across an expanding set of operational domains. While EAI systems can offer many benefits, they also pose significant short- and long-term risks, including physical harm, surveillance, and societal disruption. These risks require urgent attention from policymakers, as existing policies for industrial robots and autonomous vehicles are insufficient to manage the full range of concerns EAI systems present. To address this issue, this paper makes three contributions. First, we provide a taxonomy of the physical, informational, economic, and social risks EAI systems pose. Second, we analyze policies in the US, UK, and EU to assess how existing frameworks address these risks and to identify critical gaps. We conclude by offering policy recommendations for the safe and beneficial deployment of EAI systems, such as mandatory testing and certification schemes, clarified liability frameworks, and strategies to manage EAI’s potentially transformative economic and societal impacts.

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Establishing Best Practices in Building Rigorous Agentic Benchmarks

  • Yuxuan Zhu
  • Tengjun Jin
  • Yada Pruksachatkun
  • Andy Zhang
  • Shu Liu
  • Sasha Cui
  • Sayash Kapoor
  • Shayne Longpre

Benchmarks are essential for quantitatively tracking progress in AI. As AI agents become increasingly capable, researchers and practitioners have introduced agentic benchmarks to evaluate agents on complex, real-world tasks. These benchmarks typically measure agent capabilities by evaluating task outcomes via specific reward designs. However, we show that many agentic benchmarks have issues in task setup or reward design. For example, SWE-bench-Verified uses insufficient test cases, while $\tau$-bench counts empty responses as successes. Such issues can lead to under- or overestimation of agents’ performance by up to 100% in relative terms. To make agentic evaluation rigorous, we introduce the Agentic Benchmark Checklist (ABC), a set of guidelines that we synthesized from our benchmark-building experience, a survey of best practices, and previously reported issues. When applied to CVE-Bench, a benchmark with a particularly complex evaluation design, ABC reduces performance overestimation by 33%.

ICML Conference 2025 Conference Paper

PoisonBench: Assessing Language Model Vulnerability to Poisoned Preference Data

  • Tingchen Fu
  • Mrinank Sharma
  • Philip H. S. Torr
  • Shay B. Cohen
  • David Krueger 0001
  • Fazl Barez

Preference learning is a central component for aligning current LLMs, but this process can be vulnerable to data poisoning attacks. To address this concern, we introduce PoisonBench, a benchmark for evaluating large language models’ susceptibility to data poisoning during preference learning. Data poisoning attacks can manipulate large language model responses to include hidden malicious content or biases, potentially causing the model to generate harmful or unintended outputs while appearing to function normally. We deploy two distinct attack types across eight realistic scenarios, assessing 22 widely-used models. Our findings reveal concerning trends: (1) Scaling up parameter size does not always enhance resilience against poisoning attacks and the influence on model resilience varies among different model suites. (2) There exists a log-linear relationship between the effects of the attack and the data poison ratio; (3) The effect of data poisoning can generalize to extrapolated triggers that are not included in the poisoned data. These results expose weaknesses in current preference learning techniques, highlighting the urgent need for more robust defenses against malicious models and data manipulation.

ICLR Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Towards Interpreting Visual Information Processing in Vision-Language Models

  • Clement Neo
  • C. -H. Luke Ong
  • Philip H. S. Torr
  • Mor Geva
  • David Krueger 0001
  • Fazl Barez

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are powerful tools for processing and understanding text and images. We study the processing of visual tokens in the language model component of LLaVA, a prominent VLM. Our approach focuses on analyzing the localization of object information, the evolution of visual token representations across layers, and the mechanism of integrating visual information for predictions. Through ablation studies, we demonstrated that object identification accuracy drops by over 70\% when object-specific tokens are removed. We observed that visual token representations become increasingly interpretable in the vocabulary space across layers, suggesting an alignment with textual tokens corresponding to image content. Finally, we found that the model extracts object information from these refined representations at the last token position for prediction, mirroring the process in text-only language models for factual association tasks. These findings provide crucial insights into how VLMs process and integrate visual information, bridging the gap between our understanding of language and vision models, and paving the way for more interpretable and controllable multimodal systems.

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Interpreting Learned Feedback Patterns in Large Language Models

  • Luke Marks
  • Amir Abdullah
  • Clement Neo
  • Rauno Arike
  • David Krueger
  • Philip Torr
  • Fazl Barez

Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) is widely used to train large language models (LLMs). However, it is unclear whether LLMs accurately learn the underlying preferences in human feedback data. We coin the term Learned Feedback Pattern (LFP) for patterns in an LLM's activations learned during RLHF that improve its performance on the fine-tuning task. We hypothesize that LLMs with LFPs accurately aligned to the fine-tuning feedback exhibit consistent activation patterns for outputs that would have received similar feedback during RLHF. To test this, we train probes to estimate the feedback signal implicit in the activations of a fine-tuned LLM. We then compare these estimates to the true feedback, measuring how accurate the LFPs are to the fine-tuning feedback. Our probes are trained on a condensed, sparse and interpretable representation of LLM activations, making it easier to correlate features of the input with our probe's predictions. We validate our probes by comparing the neural features they correlate with positive feedback inputs against the features GPT-4 describes and classifies as related to LFPs. Understanding LFPs can help minimize discrepancies between LLM behavior and training objectives, which is essential for the safety and alignment of LLMs.

ICML Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Position: Near to Mid-term Risks and Opportunities of Open-Source Generative AI

  • Francisco Eiras
  • Aleksandar Petrov
  • Bertie Vidgen
  • Christian Schröder de Witt
  • Fabio Pizzati
  • Katherine Elkins
  • Supratik Mukhopadhyay
  • Adel Bibi

In the next few years, applications of Generative AI are expected to revolutionize a number of different areas, ranging from science & medicine to education. The potential for these seismic changes has triggered a lively debate about potential risks and resulted in calls for tighter regulation, in particular from some of the major tech companies who are leading in AI development. While regulation is important, it is key that it does not put at risk the budding field of open-source Generative AI. We argue for the responsible open sourcing of generative AI models in the near and medium term. To set the stage, we first introduce an AI openness taxonomy system and apply it to 40 current large language models. We then outline differential benefits and risks of open versus closed source AI and present potential risk mitigation, ranging from best practices to calls for technical and scientific contributions. We hope that this report will add a much needed missing voice to the current public discourse on near to mid-term AI safety and other societal impact.

ICLR Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Understanding Addition in Transformers

  • Philip Quirke
  • Fazl Barez

Understanding the inner workings of machine learning models like Transformers is vital for their safe and ethical use. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of a one-layer Transformer model trained to perform n-digit integer addition. Our findings suggests that the model dissects the task into parallel streams dedicated to individual digits, employing varied algorithms tailored to different positions within the digits. Furthermore, we identify a rare scenario characterized by high loss, which we explain. By thoroughly elucidating the model’s algorithm, we provide new insights into its functioning. These findings are validated through rigorous testing and mathematical modeling, thereby contributing to the broader fields of model understanding and interpretability. Our approach opens the door for analyzing more complex tasks and multi-layer Transformer models.

ICML Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Value-Evolutionary-Based Reinforcement Learning

  • Pengyi Li 0001
  • Jianye Hao
  • Hongyao Tang
  • Yan Zheng 0002
  • Fazl Barez

Combining Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs) and Reinforcement Learning (RL) for policy search has been proven to improve RL performance. However, previous works largely overlook value-based RL in favor of merging EAs with policy-based RL. This paper introduces Value-Evolutionary-Based Reinforcement Learning (VEB-RL) that focuses on the integration of EAs with value-based RL. The framework maintains a population of value functions instead of policies and leverages negative Temporal Difference error as the fitness metric for evolution. The metric is more sample-efficient for population evaluation than cumulative rewards and is closely associated with the accuracy of the value function approximation. Additionally, VEB-RL enables elites of the population to interact with the environment to offer high-quality samples for RL optimization, whereas the RL value function participates in the population’s evolution in each generation. Experiments on MinAtar and Atari demonstrate the superiority of VEB-RL in significantly improving DQN, Rainbow, and SPR. Our code is available on https: //github. com/yeshenpy/VEB-RL.

v2026.09.13