Author name cluster

Eric Hanchen Jiang

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

3 papers

1 author row

AAAI Conference 2026 Conference Paper

DAWN: Distributed LLM Multi-Agent Workflow Synthesis

Guancheng Wan
Mo Zhou
Ziyi Wang
Xiaoran Shang
Eric Hanchen Jiang
Guibin Zhang
Jinhe Bi
Yunpu Ma

Large language models (LLMs) have recently empowered multi-agent systems (MAS) to achieve remarkable advances in collaborative reasoning and complex task automation. The effectiveness of these systems fundamentally depends on the design of adaptive communication graphs—the underlying workflows that coordinate agent interactions. However, in real-world scenarios, strict privacy constraints often silo data across organizations, and client distributions are highly non-IID, posing major challenges for synthesizing such workflows. In this work, we are the first to systematically study distributed multi-agent workflow synthesis under these privacy and heterogeneity constraints, and we introduce the Difficulty-Based Skew (DBS) benchmark to emulate such challenging environments. Drawing inspiration from federated graph learning (FGL)—which has primarily focused on classification over static graphs—we identify a critical gap: existing FGL methods do not address the generative design of communication topologies. We reveal two fundamental obstacles to generative workflow synthesis in this setting: (i) workflow specialization conflict, where agents optimized for different task distributions generate incompatible communication patterns that resist meaningful aggregation, and (ii) structural communication shift, where locally optimal agent interaction graphs fail to compose into globally coherent multi-agent workflows. To address these challenges, we propose DAWN, a federated framework that integrates two key innovations: Parametric Resonance, which robustly aggregates heterogeneous local updates via layer-wise SVD-based denoising and alignment, and Structural Gravity, which regularizes local workflow generation by penalizing the Fusion Gromov-Wasserstein distance to a set of prototype communication graphs, ensuring global structural coherence without stifling local adaptation. Experiments on the DBS benchmark show that DAWN surpasses baselines in global task success and reduces inter-client graph divergence, laying a solid foundation for privacy-preserving, adaptive MAS workflow design in heterogeneous settings.

PDF Details DOI

AAAI Conference 2026 Conference Paper

ENCORE: Entropy-guided Reward Composition for Multi-head Safety Reward Models

Xiaomin Li
Xupeng Chen
Jingxuan Fan
Eric Hanchen Jiang
Mingye Gao

The safety alignment of large language models (LLMs) often relies on reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), which requires human annotations to construct preference datasets. Given the challenge of assigning overall quality scores to data, recent works increasingly adopt fine-grained ratings based on multiple safety rules. In this paper, we discover a robust phenomenon: Rules with higher rating entropy tend to have lower accuracy in distinguishing human-preferred responses. Exploiting this insight, we propose ENCORE, a simple entropy-guided method to compose multi-head rewards by penalizing rules with high rating entropy. Theoretically, we show that such rules yield negligible weights under the Bradley–Terry loss during weight optimization, naturally justifying their penalization. Empirically, ENCORE consistently outperforms strong baselines, including random and uniform weighting, single-head Bradley–Terry, and LLM-as-a-judge, etc. on RewardBench safety tasks. Our method is completely training-free, generally applicable across datasets, and retains interpretability, making it a practical and effective approach for multi-attribute reward modeling.

PDF Details DOI

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

CARES: Comprehensive Evaluation of Safety and Adversarial Robustness in Medical LLMs

Sijia Chen
Xiaomin Li
Mengxue Zhang
Eric Hanchen Jiang
Qingcheng Zeng
Chen-Hsiang Yu

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in medical contexts, raising critical concerns about safety, alignment, and susceptibility to adversarial manipulation. While prior benchmarks assess model refusal capabilities for harmful prompts, they often lack clinical specificity, graded harmfulness levels, and coverage of jailbreak-style attacks. We introduce CARES (Clinical Adversarial Robustness and Evaluation of Safety), a benchmark for evaluating LLM safety in healthcare. CARES includes over 18, 000 prompts spanning eight medical safety principles, four harm levels, and four prompting styles—direct, indirect, obfuscated, and role-play—to simulate both malicious and benign use cases. We propose a three-way response evaluation protocol (Accept, Caution, Refuse) and a fine-grained Safety Score metric to assess model behavior. Our analysis reveals that many state-of-the-art LLMs remain vulnerable to jailbreaks that subtly rephrase harmful prompts, while also over-refusing safe but atypically phrased queries. Finally, we propose a mitigation strategy using a lightweight classifier to detect jailbreak attempts and steer models toward safer behavior via reminder-based conditioning. CARES provides a rigorous framework for testing and improving medical LLM safety under adversarial and ambiguous conditions.

PDF Details