Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Elliot Catt

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

8 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

8

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Amortized Planning with Large-Scale Transformers: A Case Study on Chess

  • Anian Ruoss
  • Grégoire Delétang
  • Sourabh Medapati
  • Jordi Grau-Moya
  • Li K. Wenliang
  • Elliot Catt
  • John Reid
  • Cannada A. Lewis

This paper uses chess, a landmark planning problem in AI, to assess transformers’ performance on a planning task where memorization is futile — even at a large scale. To this end, we release ChessBench, a large-scale benchmark dataset of 10 million chess games with legal move and value annotations (15 billion data points) provided by Stockfish 16, the state-of-the-art chess engine. We train transformers with up to 270 million parameters on ChessBench via supervised learning and perform extensive ablations to assess the impact of dataset size, model size, architecture type, and different prediction targets (state-values, action-values, and behavioral cloning). Our largest models learn to predict action-values for novel boards quite accurately, implying highly non-trivial generalization. Despite performing no explicit search, our resulting chess policy solves challenging chess puzzles and achieves a surprisingly strong Lichess blitz Elo of 2895 against humans (grandmaster level). We also compare to Leela Chess Zero and AlphaZero (trained without supervision via self-play) with and without search. We show that, although a remarkably good approximation of Stockfish’s search-based algorithm can be distilled into large-scale transformers via supervised learning, perfect distillation is still beyond reach, thus making ChessBench well-suited for future research.

ICLR Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Language Modeling Is Compression

  • Grégoire Delétang
  • Anian Ruoss
  • Paul-Ambroise Duquenne
  • Elliot Catt
  • Tim Genewein
  • Christopher Mattern
  • Jordi Grau-Moya
  • Li Kevin Wenliang

It has long been established that predictive models can be transformed into lossless compressors and vice versa. Incidentally, in recent years, the machine learning community has focused on training increasingly large and powerful self-supervised (language) models. Since these large language models exhibit impressive predictive capabilities, they are well-positioned to be strong compressors. In this work, we advocate for viewing the prediction problem through the lens of compression and evaluate the compression capabilities of large (foundation) models. We show that large language models are powerful general-purpose predictors and that the compression viewpoint provides novel insights into scaling laws, tokenization, and in-context learning. For example, Chinchilla 70B, while trained primarily on text, compresses ImageNet patches to 43.4% and LibriSpeech samples to 16.4% of their raw size, beating domain-specific compressors like PNG (58.5%) or FLAC (30.3%), respectively. Finally, we show that the prediction-compression equivalence allows us to use any compressor (like gzip) to build a conditional generative model.

ICML Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Learning Universal Predictors

  • Jordi Grau-Moya
  • Tim Genewein
  • Marcus Hutter
  • Laurent Orseau
  • Grégoire Delétang
  • Elliot Catt
  • Anian Ruoss
  • Li Kevin Wenliang

Meta-learning has emerged as a powerful approach to train neural networks to learn new tasks quickly from limited data by pre-training them on a broad set of tasks. But, what are the limits of meta-learning? In this work, we explore the potential of amortizing the most powerful universal predictor, namely Solomonoff Induction (SI), into neural networks via leveraging (memory-based) meta-learning to its limits. We use Universal Turing Machines (UTMs) to generate training data used to expose networks to a broad range of patterns. We provide theoretical analysis of the UTM data generation processes and meta-training protocols. We conduct comprehensive experiments with neural architectures (e. g. LSTMs, Transformers) and algorithmic data generators of varying complexity and universality. Our results suggest that UTM data is a valuable resource for meta-learning, and that it can be used to train neural networks capable of learning universal prediction strategies.

ICML Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Memory-Based Meta-Learning on Non-Stationary Distributions

  • Tim Genewein
  • Grégoire Delétang
  • Anian Ruoss
  • Li Kevin Wenliang
  • Elliot Catt
  • Vincent Dutordoir
  • Jordi Grau-Moya
  • Laurent Orseau

Memory-based meta-learning is a technique for approximating Bayes-optimal predictors. Under fairly general conditions, minimizing sequential prediction error, measured by the log loss, leads to implicit meta-learning. The goal of this work is to investigate how far this interpretation can be realized by current sequence prediction models and training regimes. The focus is on piecewise stationary sources with unobserved switching-points, which arguably capture an important characteristic of natural language and action-observation sequences in partially observable environments. We show that various types of memory-based neural models, including Transformers, LSTMs, and RNNs can learn to accurately approximate known Bayes-optimal algorithms and behave as if performing Bayesian inference over the latent switching-points and the latent parameters governing the data distribution within each segment.

ICLR Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Neural Networks and the Chomsky Hierarchy

  • Grégoire Delétang
  • Anian Ruoss
  • Jordi Grau-Moya
  • Tim Genewein
  • Li Kevin Wenliang
  • Elliot Catt
  • Chris Cundy
  • Marcus Hutter

Reliable generalization lies at the heart of safe ML and AI. However, understanding when and how neural networks generalize remains one of the most important unsolved problems in the field. In this work, we conduct an extensive empirical study (20'910 models, 15 tasks) to investigate whether insights from the theory of computation can predict the limits of neural network generalization in practice. We demonstrate that grouping tasks according to the Chomsky hierarchy allows us to forecast whether certain architectures will be able to generalize to out-of-distribution inputs. This includes negative results where even extensive amounts of data and training time never lead to any non-trivial generalization, despite models having sufficient capacity to fit the training data perfectly. Our results show that, for our subset of tasks, RNNs and Transformers fail to generalize on non-regular tasks, LSTMs can solve regular and counter-language tasks, and only networks augmented with structured memory (such as a stack or memory tape) can successfully generalize on context-free and context-sensitive tasks.

NeurIPS Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Self-Predictive Universal AI

  • Elliot Catt
  • Jordi Grau-Moya
  • Marcus Hutter
  • Matthew Aitchison
  • Tim Genewein
  • Grégoire Delétang
  • Kevin Li
  • Joel Veness

Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithms typically utilize learning and/or planning techniques to derive effective policies. The integration of both approaches has proven to be highly successful in addressing complex sequential decision-making challenges, as evidenced by algorithms such as AlphaZero and MuZero, which consolidate the planning process into a parametric search-policy. AIXI, the most potent theoretical universal agent, leverages planning through comprehensive search as its primary means to find an optimal policy. Here we define an alternative universal agent, which we call Self-AIXI, that on the contrary to AIXI, maximally exploits learning to obtain good policies. It does so by self-predicting its own stream of action data, which is generated, similarly to other TD(0) agents, by taking an action maximization step over the current on-policy (universal mixture-policy) Q-value estimates. We prove that Self-AIXI converges to AIXI, and inherits a series of properties like maximal Legg-Hutter intelligence and the self-optimizing property.

EWRL Workshop 2022 Workshop Paper

On Reward Binarisation and Bayesian Agents

  • Elliot Catt
  • Marcus Hutter
  • Joel Veness

Reward binarisation is a common heuristically applied technique which can potentially simplify a given reinforcement learning problem. However this procedure done without care can modify the original problem, or throw away essential information. In this paper we study a number of natural forms of reward binarisation, and characterise their effects in terms of problem expressivity. We show positive results for MDPs, POMDPs, and k-order MDPs and a negative result for general history based reinforcement learning agents. Furthermore we show that binary Bayesian reinforcement learning agents enjoy convergence properties similar to their non-binarised counterparts.

IJCAI Conference 2019 Conference Paper

A Strongly Asymptotically Optimal Agent in General Environments

  • Michael K. Cohen
  • Elliot Catt
  • Marcus Hutter

Reinforcement Learning agents are expected to eventually perform well. Typically, this takes the form of a guarantee about the asymptotic behavior of an algorithm given some assumptions about the environment. We present an algorithm for a policy whose value approaches the optimal value with probability 1 in all computable probabilistic environments, provided the agent has a bounded horizon. This is known as strong asymptotic optimality, and it was previously unknown whether it was possible for a policy to be strongly asymptotically optimal in the class of all computable probabilistic environments. Our agent, Inquisitive Reinforcement Learner (Inq), is more likely to explore the more it expects an exploratory action to reduce its uncertainty about which environment it is in, hence the term inquisitive. Exploring inquisitively is a strategy that can be applied generally; for more manageable environment classes, inquisitiveness is tractable. We conducted experiments in "grid-worlds" to compare the Inquisitive Reinforcement Learner to other weakly asymptotically optimal agents.

v2026.09.13