Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Dorian Baudry

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

14 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

14

EWRL Workshop 2025 Workshop Paper

Does Stochastic Gradient really succeed for bandits?

  • Dorian Baudry
  • Emmeran Johnson
  • Simon Vary
  • Ciara Pike-Burke
  • Patrick Rebeschini

Recent works of Mei et al. (2023, 2024) have deepened the theoretical understanding of the Stochastic Gradient Bandit (SGB) policy, showing that using a constant learning rate guarantees asymptotic convergence to the optimal policy, and that sufficiently small learning rates can yield logarithmic regret. However, whether logarithmic regret holds beyond small learning rates remains unclear. In this work, we take a step towards characterizing the regret regimes of SGB as a function of its learning rate. For two--armed bandits, we identify a sharp threshold, scaling with the sub-optimality gap $\Delta$, below which SGB achieves logarithmic regret on all instances, and above which it can incur polynomial regret on some instances. This result highlights the necessity of knowing (or estimating) $\Delta$ to ensure logarithmic regret with a constant learning rate. For general $K$-armed bandits, we further show the learning rate must scale inversely with $K$ to avoid polynomial regret. We introduce novel techniques to derive regret upper bounds for SGB, laying the groundwork for future advances in the theory of gradient-based bandit algorithms.

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Does Stochastic Gradient really succeed for bandits?

  • Dorian Baudry
  • Emmeran Johnson
  • Simon Vary
  • Ciara Pike-Burke
  • Patrick Rebeschini

Recent works of Mei et al. (2023, 2024) have deepened the theoretical understanding of the *Stochastic Gradient Bandit* (SGB) policy, showing that using a constant learning rate guarantees asymptotic convergence to the optimal policy, and that sufficiently *small* learning rates can yield logarithmic regret. However, whether logarithmic regret holds beyond small learning rates remains unclear. In this work, we take a step towards characterizing the regret *regimes* of SGB as a function of its learning rate. For two--armed bandits, we identify a sharp threshold, scaling with the sub-optimality gap $\Delta$, below which SGB achieves *logarithmic* regret on all instances, and above which it can incur *polynomial* regret on some instances. This result highlights the necessity of knowing (or estimating) $\Delta$ to ensure logarithmic regret with a constant learning rate. For general $K$-armed bandits, we further show the learning rate must scale inversely with $K$ to avoid polynomial regret. We introduce novel techniques to derive regret upper bounds for SGB, laying the groundwork for future advances in the theory of gradient-based bandit algorithms.

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Non-stationary Bandit Convex Optimization: A Comprehensive Study

  • Xiaoqi Liu
  • Dorian Baudry
  • Julian Zimmert
  • Patrick Rebeschini
  • Arya Akhavan

Bandit Convex Optimization is a fundamental class of sequential decision-making problems, where the learner selects actions from a continuous domain and observes a loss (but not its gradient) at only one point per round. We study this problem in non-stationary environments, and aim to minimize the regret under three standard measures of non-stationarity: the number of switches $S$ in the comparator sequence, the total variation $\Delta$ of the loss functions, and the path-length $P$ of the comparator sequence. We propose a polynomial-time algorithm, Tilted Exponentially Weighted Average with Sleeping Experts (TEWA-SE), which adapts the sleeping experts framework from online convex optimization to the bandit setting. For strongly convex losses, we prove that TEWA-SE is minimax-optimal with respect to known $S$ and $\Delta$ by establishing matching upper and lower bounds. By equipping TEWA-SE with the Bandit-over-Bandit framework, we extend our analysis to environments with unknown non-stationarity measures. For general convex losses, we introduce a second algorithm, clipped Exploration by Optimization (cExO), based on exponential weights over a discretized action space. While not polynomial-time computable, this method achieves minimax-optimal regret with respect to known $S$ and $\Delta$, and improves on the best existing bounds with respect to $P$.

EWRL Workshop 2025 Workshop Paper

Optimizing the coalition gain in Online Auctions with Greedy Structured Bandits

  • Dorian Baudry
  • Hugo Richard
  • Maria Cherifa
  • Clément Calauzènes
  • Vianney Perchet

Motivated by online display advertising, this work considers repeated second-price auctions, where agents sample their value from an unknown distribution with a cumulative distribution function F. In each auction t, a decision-maker bound by limited observations selects nt agents from a coalition of N to compete for a prize with p other agents, aiming to maximize the cumulative reward of the coalition across all auctions. The problem is framed as an N -armed structured bandit, each number of player sent being an arm n, with expected reward r(n) fully characterized by F and p + n. We present two algorithms, Local-Greedy (LG) and Greedy-Grid (GG), both achieving constant problem-dependent regret. This relies on three key ingredients: 1. an estimator of r(n) from feedback collected from any arm k, 2. concentration bounds of these estimates for k within an estimation neighborhood of n and 3. the unimodality property of r under standard assumptions on F. Additionally, GG exhibits problem-independent guarantees on top of best problem-dependent guarantees. However, by avoiding to rely on confidence intervals, LG practically outperforms GG, as well as standard unimodal bandit algorithms such as OSUB or multi-armed bandit algorithms

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Improved learning rates in multi-unit uniform price auctions

  • Marius Potfer
  • Dorian Baudry
  • Hugo Richard
  • Vianney Perchet
  • Cheng Wan

Motivated by the strategic participation of electricity producers in electricity day-ahead market, we study the problem of online learning in repeated multi-unit uniform price auctions focusing on the adversarial opposing bid setting. The main contribution of this paper is the introduction of a new modeling of the bid space. Indeed, we prove that a learning algorithm leveraging the structure of this problem achieves a regret of $\tilde{O}(K^{4/3}T^{2/3})$ under bandit feedback, improving over the bound of $\tilde{O}(K^{7/4}T^{3/4})$ previously obtained in the literature. This improved regret rate is tight up to logarithmic terms. %by deducing a lower bound of $\Omega (T^{2/3})$ from the dynamic pricing literature, proving the optimality in $T$ of our algorithm up to log factors. Inspired by electricity reserve markets, we further introduce a different feedback model under which all winning bids are revealed. This feedback interpolates between the full-information and bandit scenarios depending on the auctions' results. We prove that, under this feedback, the algorithm that we propose achieves regret $\tilde{O}(K^{5/2}\sqrt{T})$.

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Lookback Prophet Inequalities

  • Ziyad Benomar
  • Dorian Baudry
  • Vianney Perchet

Prophet inequalities are fundamental optimal stopping problems, where a decision-maker observes sequentially items with values sampled independently from known distributions, and must decide at each new observation to either stop and gain the current value or reject it irrevocably and move to the next step. This model is often too pessimistic and does not adequately represent real-world online selection processes. Potentially, rejectesd items can be revisited and a fraction of their value can be recovered. To analyze this problem, we consider general decay functions $D_1, D_2, \ldots$, quantifying the value to be recovered from a rejected item, depending on how far it has been observed in the past. We analyze how lookback improves, or not, the competitive ratio in prophet inequalities in different order models. We show that, under mild monotonicity assumptions on the decay functions, the problem can be reduced to the case where all the decay functions are equal to the same function $x \mapsto \gamma x$, where $\gamma = \inf_{x>0} \inf_{j \geq 1} D_j(x)/x$. Consequently, we focus on this setting and refine the analyses of the competitive ratios, with upper and lower bounds expressed as increasing functions of $\gamma$.

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Optimizing the coalition gain in Online Auctions with Greedy Structured Bandits

  • Dorian Baudry
  • Hugo Richard
  • Maria Cherifa
  • Clément Calauzènes
  • Vianney Perchet

Motivated by online display advertising, this work considers repeated second-price auctions, where agents sample their value from an unknown distribution with cumulative distribution function $F$. In each auction $t$, a decision-maker bound by limited observations selects $n_t$ agents from a coalition of $N$ to compete for a prize with $p$ other agents, aiming to maximize the cumulative reward of the coalition across all auctions. The problem is framed as an $N$-armed structured bandit, each number of player sent being an arm $n$, with expected reward $r(n)$ fully characterized by $F$ and $p+n$. We present two algorithms, Local-Greedy (LG) and Greedy-Grid (GG), both achieving *constant* problem-dependent regret. This relies on three key ingredients: **1. ** an estimator of $r(n)$ from feedback collected from any arm $k$, **2. ** concentration bounds of these estimates for $k$ within an estimation neighborhood of $n$ and **3. ** the unimodality property of $r$ under standard assumptions on $F$. Additionally, GG exhibits problem-independent guarantees on top of best problem-dependent guarantees. However, by avoiding to rely on confidence intervals, LG practically outperforms GG, as well as standard unimodal bandit algorithms such as OSUB or multi-armed bandit algorithms.

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

The Value of Reward Lookahead in Reinforcement Learning

  • Nadav Merlis
  • Dorian Baudry
  • Vianney Perchet

In reinforcement learning (RL), agents sequentially interact with changing environments while aiming to maximize the obtained rewards. Usually, rewards are observed only after acting, and so the goal is to maximize the expected cumulative reward. Yet, in many practical settings, reward information is observed in advance -- prices are observed before performing transactions; nearby traffic information is partially known; and goals are oftentimes given to agents prior to the interaction. In this work, we aim to quantifiably analyze the value of such future reward information through the lens of _competitive analysis. In particular, we measure the ratio between the value of standard RL agents and that of agents with partial future-reward lookahead. We characterize the worst-case reward distribution and derive exact ratios for the worst-case reward expectations. Surprisingly, the resulting ratios relate to known quantities in offline RL and reward-free exploration. We further provide tight bounds for the ratio given the worst-case dynamics. Our results cover the full spectrum between observing the immediate rewards before acting to observing all the rewards before the interaction starts.

NeurIPS Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Fast Asymptotically Optimal Algorithms for Non-Parametric Stochastic Bandits

  • Dorian Baudry
  • Fabien Pesquerel
  • Rémy Degenne
  • Odalric-Ambrym Maillard

We consider the problem of regret minimization in non-parametric stochastic bandits. When the rewards are known to be bounded from above, there exists asymptotically optimal algorithms, with asymptotic regret depending on an infimum of Kullback-Leibler divergences (KL). These algorithms are computationally expensive and require storing all past rewards, thus simpler but non-optimal algorithms are often used instead. We introduce several methods to approximate the infimum KL which reduce drastically the computational and memory costs of existing optimal algorithms, while keeping their regret guaranties. We apply our findings to design new variants of the MED and IMED algorithms, and demonstrate their interest with extensive numerical simulations.

NeurIPS Conference 2022 Conference Paper

Top Two Algorithms Revisited

  • Marc Jourdan
  • Rémy Degenne
  • Dorian Baudry
  • Rianne de Heide
  • Emilie Kaufmann

Top two algorithms arose as an adaptation of Thompson sampling to best arm identification in multi-armed bandit models for parametric families of arms. They select the next arm to sample from by randomizing among two candidate arms, a leader and a challenger. Despite their good empirical performance, theoretical guarantees for fixed-confidence best arm identification have only been obtained when the arms are Gaussian with known variances. In this paper, we provide a general analysis of top-two methods, which identifies desirable properties of the leader, the challenger, and the (possibly non-parametric) distributions of the arms. As a result, we obtain theoretically supported top-two algorithms for best arm identification with bounded distributions. Our proof method demonstrates in particular that the sampling step used to select the leader inherited from Thompson sampling can be replaced by other choices, like selecting the empirical best arm.

NeurIPS Conference 2021 Conference Paper

From Optimality to Robustness: Adaptive Re-Sampling Strategies in Stochastic Bandits

  • Dorian Baudry
  • Patrick Saux
  • Odalric-Ambrym Maillard

The stochastic multi-arm bandit problem has been extensively studied under standard assumptions on the arm's distribution (e. g bounded with known support, exponential family, etc). These assumptions are suitable for many real-world problems but sometimes they require knowledge (on tails for instance) that may not be precisely accessible to the practitioner, raising the question of the robustness of bandit algorithms to model misspecification. In this paper we study a generic \emph{Dirichlet Sampling} (DS) algorithm, based on pairwise comparisons of empirical indices computed with \textit{re-sampling} of the arms' observations and a data-dependent \textit{exploration bonus}. We show that different variants of this strategy achieve provably optimal regret guarantees when the distributions are bounded and logarithmic regret for semi-bounded distributions with a mild quantile condition. We also show that a simple tuning achieve robustness with respect to a large class of unbounded distributions, at the cost of slightly worse than logarithmic asymptotic regret. We finally provide numerical experiments showing the merits of DS in a decision-making problem on synthetic agriculture data.

ICML Conference 2021 Conference Paper

On Limited-Memory Subsampling Strategies for Bandits

  • Dorian Baudry
  • Yoan Russac
  • Olivier Cappé

There has been a recent surge of interest in non-parametric bandit algorithms based on subsampling. One drawback however of these approaches is the additional complexity required by random subsampling and the storage of the full history of rewards. Our first contribution is to show that a simple deterministic subsampling rule, proposed in the recent work of \citet{baudry2020sub} under the name of “last-block subsampling”, is asymptotically optimal in one-parameter exponential families. In addition, we prove that these guarantees also hold when limiting the algorithm memory to a polylogarithmic function of the time horizon. These findings open up new perspectives, in particular for non-stationary scenarios in which the arm distributions evolve over time. We propose a variant of the algorithm in which only the most recent observations are used for subsampling, achieving optimal regret guarantees under the assumption of a known number of abrupt changes. Extensive numerical simulations highlight the merits of this approach, particularly when the changes are not only affecting the means of the rewards.

ICML Conference 2021 Conference Paper

Optimal Thompson Sampling strategies for support-aware CVaR bandits

  • Dorian Baudry
  • Romain Gautron
  • Emilie Kaufmann
  • Odalric-Ambrym Maillard

In this paper we study a multi-arm bandit problem in which the quality of each arm is measured by the Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR) at some level alpha of the reward distribution. While existing works in this setting mainly focus on Upper Confidence Bound algorithms, we introduce a new Thompson Sampling approach for CVaR bandits on bounded rewards that is flexible enough to solve a variety of problems grounded on physical resources. Building on a recent work by Riou & Honda (2020), we introduce B-CVTS for continuous bounded rewards and M-CVTS for multinomial distributions. On the theoretical side, we provide a non-trivial extension of their analysis that enables to theoretically bound their CVaR regret minimization performance. Strikingly, our results show that these strategies are the first to provably achieve asymptotic optimality in CVaR bandits, matching the corresponding asymptotic lower bounds for this setting. Further, we illustrate empirically the benefit of Thompson Sampling approaches both in a realistic environment simulating a use-case in agriculture and on various synthetic examples.

NeurIPS Conference 2020 Conference Paper

Sub-sampling for Efficient Non-Parametric Bandit Exploration

  • Dorian Baudry
  • Emilie Kaufmann
  • Odalric-Ambrym Maillard

In this paper we propose the first multi-armed bandit algorithm based on re-sampling that achieves asymptotically optimal regret simultaneously for different families of arms (namely Bernoulli, Gaussian and Poisson distributions). Unlike Thompson Sampling which requires to specify a different prior to be optimal in each case, our proposal RB-SDA does not need any distribution-dependent tuning. RB-SDA belongs to the family of Sub-sampling Duelling Algorithms (SDA) which combines the sub-sampling idea first used by the BESA and SSMC algorithms with different sub-sampling schemes. In particular, RB-SDA uses Random Block sampling. We perform an experimental study assessing the flexibility and robustness of this promising novel approach for exploration in bandit models.

v2026.09.13