Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Dirk van der Hoeven

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

15 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

15

JMLR Journal 2025 Journal Article

A Unified Analysis of Nonstochastic Delayed Feedback for Combinatorial Semi-Bandits, Linear Bandits, and MDPs

  • Lukas Zierahn
  • Dirk van der Hoeven
  • Tal Lancewicki
  • Aviv Rosenberg
  • Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi

We derive a new analysis of Follow The Regularized Leader (FTRL) for online learning with delayed bandit feedback. By separating the cost of delayed feedback from that of bandit feedback, our analysis allows us to obtain new results in four important settings. We derive the first optimal (up to logarithmic factors) regret bounds for combinatorial semi-bandits with delay and adversarial Markov Decision Processes with delay (both known and unknown transition functions). Furthermore, we use our analysis to develop an efficient algorithm for linear bandits with delay achieving near-optimal regret bounds. In order to derive these results we show that FTRL remains stable across multiple rounds under mild assumptions on the regularizer. [abs] [ pdf ][ bib ] [ code ] &copy JMLR 2025. ( edit, beta )

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

When Lower-Order Terms Dominate: Adaptive Expert Algorithms for Heavy-Tailed Losses

  • Antoine Moulin
  • Emmanuel Esposito
  • Dirk van der Hoeven

We consider the problem setting of prediction with expert advice with possibly heavy-tailed losses, i. e. , the only assumption on the losses is an upper bound on their second moments, denoted by $\theta$. We develop adaptive algorithms that do not require any prior knowledge about the range or the second moment of the losses. Existing adaptive algorithms have what is typically considered a lower-order term in their regret guarantees. We show that this lower-order term, which is often the maximum of the losses, can actually dominate the regret bound in our setting. Specifically, we show that even with small constant $\theta$, this lower-order term can scale as $\sqrt{KT}$, where $K$ is the number of experts and $T$ is the time horizon. We propose adaptive algorithms with improved regret bounds that avoid the dependence on such a lower-order term and guarantee $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{\theta T\log(K)})$ regret in the worst case, and $\mathcal{O}(\theta \log(KT)/\Delta_{\min})$ regret when the losses are sampled i. i. d. from some fixed distribution, where $\Delta_{\min}$ is the difference between the mean losses of the second best expert and the best expert. Additionally, when the loss function is the squared loss, our algorithm also guarantees improved regret bounds over prior results.

EWRL Workshop 2025 Workshop Paper

When Lower-Order Terms Dominate: Adaptive Expert Algorithms for Heavy-Tailed Losses

  • Antoine Moulin
  • Emmanuel Esposito
  • Dirk van der Hoeven

We consider the problem setting of prediction with expert advice with possibly heavy-tailed losses, i. e. \ the only assumption on the losses is an upper bound on their second moments, denoted by $\theta$. We develop adaptive algorithms that do not require any prior knowledge about the range or the second moment of the losses. Existing adaptive algorithms have what is typically considered a lower-order term in their regret guarantees. We show that this lower-order term, which is often the maximum of the losses, can actually dominate the regret bound in our setting. Specifically, we show that even with small constant $\theta$, this lower-order term can scale as $\sqrt{KT}$, where $K$ is the number of experts and $T$ is the time horizon. We propose adaptive algorithms with improved regret bounds that avoid the dependence on such a lower-order term and guarantee $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{\theta T\log(K)})$ regret in the worst case, and $\mathcal{O}(\theta \log(KT)/\Delta_{\min})$ regret when the losses are sampled i. i. d. \ from some fixed distribution, where $\Delta_{\min}$ is the difference between the mean losses of the second best expert and the best expert. Additionally, when the loss function is the squared loss, our algorithm also guarantees improved regret bounds over prior results.

ICML Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Delayed Bandits: When Do Intermediate Observations Help?

  • Emmanuel Esposito
  • Saeed Masoudian
  • Hao Qiu
  • Dirk van der Hoeven
  • Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi
  • Yevgeny Seldin

We study a $K$-armed bandit with delayed feedback and intermediate observations. We consider a model, where intermediate observations have a form of a finite state, which is observed immediately after taking an action, whereas the loss is observed after an adversarially chosen delay. We show that the regime of the mapping of states to losses determines the complexity of the problem, irrespective of whether the mapping of actions to states is stochastic or adversarial. If the mapping of states to losses is adversarial, then the regret rate is of order $\sqrt{(K+d)T}$ (within log factors), where $T$ is the time horizon and $d$ is a fixed delay. This matches the regret rate of a $K$-armed bandit with delayed feedback and without intermediate observations, implying that intermediate observations are not helpful. However, if the mapping of states to losses is stochastic, we show that the regret grows at a rate of $\sqrt{\bigl(K+\min\{|\mathcal{S}|, d\}\bigr)T}$ (within log factors), implying that if the number $|\mathcal{S}|$ of states is smaller than the delay, then intermediate observations help. We also provide refined high-probability regret upper bounds for non-uniform delays, together with experimental validation of our algorithms.

EWRL Workshop 2023 Workshop Paper

Delayed Bandits: When Do Intermediate Observations Help?

  • Emmanuel Esposito
  • Saeed Masoudian
  • Hao Qiu
  • Dirk van der Hoeven
  • Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi
  • Yevgeny Seldin

We study a $K$-armed bandit with delayed feedback and intermediate observations. We consider a model where intermediate observations have a form of a finite state, which is observed immediately after taking an action, whereas the loss is observed after an adversarially chosen delay. We show that the regime of the mapping of states to losses determines the complexity of the problem, irrespective of whether the mapping of actions to states is stochastic or adversarial. If the mapping of states to losses is adversarial, then the regret rate is of order $\sqrt{(K+d)T}$ (within log factors), where $T$ is the time horizon and $d$ is a fixed delay. This matches the regret rate of a $K$-armed bandit with delayed feedback and without intermediate observations, implying that intermediate observations are not helpful. However, if the mapping of states to losses is stochastic, we show that the regret grows at a rate of $\sqrt{\bigl(K+\min\{|\mathcal{S}|, d\}\bigr)T}$ (within log factors), implying that if the number $|\mathcal{S}|$ of states is smaller than the delay, then intermediate observations help. We also provide refined high-probability regret upper bounds for non-uniform delays, together with experimental validation of our algorithms.

ICML Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Trading-Off Payments and Accuracy in Online Classification with Paid Stochastic Experts

  • Dirk van der Hoeven
  • Ciara Pike-Burke
  • Hao Qiu
  • Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi

We investigate online classification with paid stochastic experts. Here, before making their prediction, each expert must be paid. The amount that we pay each expert directly influences the accuracy of their prediction through some unknown Lipschitz “productivity” function. In each round, the learner must decide how much to pay each expert and then make a prediction. They incur a cost equal to a weighted sum of the prediction error and upfront payments for all experts. We introduce an online learning algorithm whose total cost after $T$ rounds exceeds that of a predictor which knows the productivity of all experts in advance by at most $\mathcal{O}\big(K^2(\ln T)\sqrt{T}\big)$ where $K$ is the number of experts. In order to achieve this result, we combine Lipschitz bandits and online classification with surrogate losses. These tools allow us to improve upon the bound of order $T^{2/3}$ one would obtain in the standard Lipschitz bandit setting. Our algorithm is empirically evaluated on synthetic data.

NeurIPS Conference 2022 Conference Paper

A Near-Optimal Best-of-Both-Worlds Algorithm for Online Learning with Feedback Graphs

  • Chloé Rouyer
  • Dirk van der Hoeven
  • Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi
  • Yevgeny Seldin

We consider online learning with feedback graphs, a sequential decision-making framework where the learner's feedback is determined by a directed graph over the action set. We present a computationally-efficient algorithm for learning in this framework that simultaneously achieves near-optimal regret bounds in both stochastic and adversarial environments. The bound against oblivious adversaries is $\tilde{O} (\sqrt{\alpha T})$, where $T$ is the time horizon and $\alpha$ is the independence number of the feedback graph. The bound against stochastic environments is $O\big((\ln T)^2 \max_{S\in \mathcal I(G)} \sum_{i \in S} \Delta_i^{-1}\big)$ where $\mathcal I(G)$ is the family of all independent sets in a suitably defined undirected version of the graph and $\Delta_i$ are the suboptimality gaps. The algorithm combines ideas from the EXP3++ algorithm for stochastic and adversarial bandits and the EXP3. G algorithm for feedback graphs with a novel exploration scheme. The scheme, which exploits the structure of the graph to reduce exploration, is key to obtain best-of-both-worlds guarantees with feedback graphs. We also extend our algorithm and results to a setting where the feedback graphs are allowed to change over time.

EWRL Workshop 2022 Workshop Paper

A Near-Optimal Best-of-Both-Worlds Algorithm for Online Learning with Feedback Graphs

  • Chloé Rouyer
  • Dirk van der Hoeven
  • Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi
  • Yevgeny Seldin

We consider online learning with feedback graphs, a sequential decision-making framework where the learner’s feedback is determined by a directed graph over the action set. We present a computationally efficient algorithm for learning in this framework that simultaneously achieves near-optimal regret bounds in both stochastic and adversarial environments. The bound against oblivious adversaries is Õ( √ αT), where T is the time horizon and α is the independence number of the feedback graph. The bound against stochastic environments is O (ln T)2 maxS∈I(G) P i∈S ∆−1 i where I (G) is the family of all independent sets in a suitably defined undirected version of the graph and ∆i are the suboptimality gaps. The algorithm combines ideas from the EXP3++ algorithm for stochastic and adversarial bandits and the EXP3.G algorithm for feedback graphs with a novel exploration scheme. The scheme, which exploits the structure of the graph to reduce exploration, is key to obtain best-of-both-worlds guarantees with feedback graphs. We also extend our algorithm and results to a setting where the feedback graphs are allowed to change over time.

NeurIPS Conference 2022 Conference Paper

A Regret-Variance Trade-Off in Online Learning

  • Dirk van der Hoeven
  • Nikita Zhivotovskiy
  • Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi

We consider prediction with expert advice for strongly convex and bounded losses, and investigate trade-offs between regret and ``variance'' (i. e. , squared difference of learner's predictions and best expert predictions). With $K$ experts, the Exponentially Weighted Average (EWA) algorithm is known to achieve $O(\log K)$ regret. We prove that a variant of EWA either achieves a \textsl{negative} regret (i. e. , the algorithm outperforms the best expert), or guarantees a $O(\log K)$ bound on \textsl{both} variance and regret. Building on this result, we show several examples of how variance of predictions can be exploited in learning. In the online to batch analysis, we show that a large empirical variance allows to stop the online to batch conversion early and outperform the risk of the best predictor in the class. We also recover the optimal rate of model selection aggregation when we do not consider early stopping. In online prediction with corrupted losses, we show that the effect of corruption on the regret can be compensated by a large variance. In online selective sampling, we design an algorithm that samples less when the variance is large, while guaranteeing the optimal regret bound in expectation. In online learning with abstention, we use a similar term as the variance to derive the first high-probability $O(\log K)$ regret bound in this setting. Finally, we extend our results to the setting of online linear regression.

NeurIPS Conference 2022 Conference Paper

Learning on the Edge: Online Learning with Stochastic Feedback Graphs

  • Emmanuel Esposito
  • Federico Fusco
  • Dirk van der Hoeven
  • Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi

The framework of feedback graphs is a generalization of sequential decision-making with bandit or full information feedback. In this work, we study an extension where the directed feedback graph is stochastic, following a distribution similar to the classical Erdős-Rényi model. Specifically, in each round every edge in the graph is either realized or not with a distinct probability for each edge. We prove nearly optimal regret bounds of order $\min\bigl\{\min_{\varepsilon} \sqrt{(\alpha_\varepsilon/\varepsilon) T}, \, \min_{\varepsilon} (\delta_\varepsilon/\varepsilon)^{1/3} T^{2/3}\bigr\}$ (ignoring logarithmic factors), where $\alpha_{\varepsilon}$ and $\delta_{\varepsilon}$ are graph-theoretic quantities measured on the support of the stochastic feedback graph $\mathcal{G}$ with edge probabilities thresholded at $\varepsilon$. Our result, which holds without any preliminary knowledge about $\mathcal{G}$, requires the learner to observe only the realized out-neighborhood of the chosen action. When the learner is allowed to observe the realization of the entire graph (but only the losses in the out-neighborhood of the chosen action), we derive a more efficient algorithm featuring a dependence on weighted versions of the independence and weak domination numbers that exhibits improved bounds for some special cases.

NeurIPS Conference 2021 Conference Paper

Beyond Bandit Feedback in Online Multiclass Classification

  • Dirk van der Hoeven
  • Federico Fusco
  • Nicolò Cesa-Bianchi

We study the problem of online multiclass classification in a setting where the learner's feedback is determined by an arbitrary directed graph. While including bandit feedback as a special case, feedback graphs allow a much richer set of applications, including filtering and label efficient classification. We introduce \textproc{Gappletron}, the first online multiclass algorithm that works with arbitrary feedback graphs. For this new algorithm, we prove surrogate regret bounds that hold, both in expectation and with high probability, for a large class of surrogate losses. Our bounds are of order $B\sqrt{\rho KT}$, where $B$ is the diameter of the prediction space, $K$ is the number of classes, $T$ is the time horizon, and $\rho$ is the domination number (a graph-theoretic parameter affecting the amount of exploration). In the full information case, we show that \textproc{Gappletron} achieves a constant surrogate regret of order $B^2K$. We also prove a general lower bound of order $\max\big\{B^2K, \sqrt{T}\big\}$ showing that our upper bounds are not significantly improvable. Experiments on synthetic data show that for various feedback graphs our algorithm is competitive against known baselines.

JMLR Journal 2021 Journal Article

MetaGrad: Adaptation using Multiple Learning Rates in Online Learning

  • Tim van Erven
  • Wouter M. Koolen
  • Dirk van der Hoeven

We provide a new adaptive method for online convex optimization, MetaGrad, that is robust to general convex losses but achieves faster rates for a broad class of special functions, including exp-concave and strongly convex functions, but also various types of stochastic and non-stochastic functions without any curvature. We prove this by drawing a connection to the Bernstein condition, which is known to imply fast rates in offline statistical learning. MetaGrad further adapts automatically to the size of the gradients. Its main feature is that it simultaneously considers multiple learning rates, which are weighted directly proportional to their empirical performance on the data using a new meta-algorithm. We provide three versions of MetaGrad. The full matrix version maintains a full covariance matrix and is applicable to learning tasks for which we can afford update time quadratic in the dimension. The other two versions provide speed-ups for high-dimensional learning tasks with an update time that is linear in the dimension: one is based on sketching, the other on running a separate copy of the basic algorithm per coordinate. We evaluate all versions of MetaGrad on benchmark online classification and regression tasks, on which they consistently outperform both online gradient descent and AdaGrad. [abs] [ pdf ][ bib ] [ code ] &copy JMLR 2021. ( edit, beta )

NeurIPS Conference 2020 Conference Paper

Comparator-Adaptive Convex Bandits

  • Dirk van der Hoeven
  • Ashok Cutkosky
  • Haipeng Luo

We study bandit convex optimization methods that adapt to the norm of the comparator, a topic that has only been studied before for its full-information counterpart. Specifically, we develop convex bandit algorithms with regret bounds that are small whenever the norm of the comparator is small. We first use techniques from the full-information setting to develop comparator-adaptive algorithms for linear bandits. Then, we extend the ideas to convex bandits with Lipschitz or smooth loss functions, using a new single-point gradient estimator and carefully designed surrogate losses.

NeurIPS Conference 2020 Conference Paper

Exploiting the Surrogate Gap in Online Multiclass Classification

  • Dirk van der Hoeven

We present \textproc{Gaptron}, a randomized first-order algorithm for online multiclass classification. In the full information setting we provide expected mistake bounds for \textproc{Gaptron} with respect to the logistic loss, hinge loss, and the smooth hinge loss with $O(K)$ regret, where the expectation is with respect to the learner's randomness and $K$ is the number of classes. In the bandit classification setting we show that \textproc{Gaptron} is the first linear time algorithm with $O(K\sqrt{T})$ expected regret. Additionally, the expected mistake bound of \textproc{Gaptron} does not depend on the dimension of the feature vector, contrary to previous algorithms with $O(K\sqrt{T})$ regret in the bandit classification setting. We present a new proof technique that exploits the gap between the zero-one loss and surrogate losses rather than exploiting properties such as exp-concavity or mixability, which are traditionally used to prove logarithmic or constant regret bounds.

NeurIPS Conference 2019 Conference Paper

User-Specified Local Differential Privacy in Unconstrained Adaptive Online Learning

  • Dirk van der Hoeven

Local differential privacy is a strong notion of privacy in which the provider of the data guarantees privacy by perturbing the data with random noise. In the standard application of local differential differential privacy the distribution of the noise is constant and known by the learner. In this paper we generalize this approach by allowing the provider of the data to choose the distribution of the noise without disclosing any parameters of the distribution to the learner, under the constraint that the distribution is symmetrical. We consider this problem in the unconstrained Online Convex Optimization setting with noisy feedback. In this setting the learner receives the subgradient of a loss function, perturbed by noise, and aims to achieve sublinear regret with respect to some competitor, without constraints on the norm of the competitor. We derive the first algorithms that have adaptive regret bounds in this setting, i. e. our algorithms adapt to the unknown competitor norm, unknown noise, and unknown sum of the norms of the subgradients, matching state of the art bounds in all cases.