Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Diganta Misra

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

5 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

5

TMLR Journal 2025 Journal Article

GenOL: Generating Diverse Examples for Name-only Online Learning

  • Minhyuk Seo
  • Seongwon Cho
  • Minjae Lee
  • Diganta Misra
  • Hyeonbeom Choi
  • Seon Joo Kim
  • Jonghyun Choi

Online learning methods often rely on supervised data. However, under data distribution shifts, such as in continual learning (CL), where continuously arriving online data streams incorporate new concepts (e.g., classes), real-time manual annotation is impractical due to its costs and latency, which hinder real-time adaptation. To alleviate this, `name-only' setup has been proposed, requiring only the name of concepts, not the supervised samples. A recent approach tackles this setup by supplementing data with web-scraped images, but such data often suffers from issues of data imbalance, noise, and copyright. To overcome the limitations of both human supervision and webly supervision, we propose GenOL using generative models for name-only training. But naive application of generative models results in limited diversity of generated data. Here, we enhance (i) intra-diversity, the diversity of images generated by a single model, by proposing a diverse prompt generation method that generates diverse text prompts for text-to-image models, and (ii) inter-diversity, the diversity of images generated by multiple generative models, by introducing an ensemble strategy that selects minimally overlapping samples. We empirically validate that the proposed \frameworkname outperforms prior arts, even a model trained with fully supervised data by large margins, in various tasks, including image recognition and multi-modal visual reasoning.

ICLR Conference 2025 Conference Paper

MMTEB: Massive Multilingual Text Embedding Benchmark

  • Kenneth C. Enevoldsen
  • Isaac Chung
  • Imene Kerboua
  • Márton Kardos
  • Ashwin Mathur
  • David Stap
  • Jay Gala
  • Wissam Siblini

Text embeddings are typically evaluated on a narrow set of tasks, limited in terms of languages, domains, and task types. To circumvent this limitation and to provide a more comprehensive evaluation, we introduce the Massive Multilingual Text Embedding Benchmark (MMTEB) -- a large-scale community-driven initiative expanding MTEB to over 500 quality-controlled evaluation tasks across 1,000+ languages. MMTEB includes a wide range of challenging novel tasks such as instruction following, long-document retrieval, and code retrieval, and represents the largest multilingual collection of evaluation tasks for embedding models to date. We use this collection to construct multiple highly multilingual benchmarks. We evaluate a representative set of models on these benchmarks. Our findings indicate that, while LLM-based models can achieve state-of-the-art performance on a subset of languages, the best-performing publicly available model across languages is the notably smaller, multilingual-e5-large-instruct. Massive benchmarks often impose high computational demands, limiting accessibility, particularly for low-resource communities. To address this, we downsample tasks based on inter-task correlation (i.e., selecting only a diverse set of tasks) while preserving relative rankings. We further optimize tasks such as retrieval by sampling hard negatives, creating smaller but effective splits. These optimizations allow us to introduce benchmarks at a significantly lower computational cost. For instance, we introduce a new zero-shot English benchmark that maintains a similar ordering at a fraction of the cost.

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Consent in Crisis: The Rapid Decline of the AI Data Commons

  • Shayne Longpre
  • Robert Mahari
  • Ariel Lee
  • Campbell Lund
  • Hamidah Oderinwale
  • William Brannon
  • Nayan Saxena
  • Naana Obeng-Marnu

General-purpose artificial intelligence (AI) systems are built on massive swathes of public web data, assembled into corpora such as C4, RefinedWeb, and Dolma. To our knowledge, we conduct the first, large-scale, longitudinal audit of the consent protocols for the web domains underlying AI training corpora. Our audit of 14, 000 web domains provides an expansive view of crawlable web data and how codified data use preferences are changing over time. We observe a proliferation of AI-specific clauses to limit use, acute differences in restrictions on AI developers, as well as general inconsistencies between websites' expressed intentions in their Terms of Service and their robots. txt. We diagnose these as symptoms of ineffective web protocols, not designed to cope with the widespread re-purposing of the internet for AI. Our longitudinal analyses show that in a single year (2023-2024) there has been a rapid crescendo of data restrictions from web sources, rendering ~5\%+ of all tokens in C4, or 28%+ of the most actively maintained, critical sources in C4, fully restricted from use. For Terms of Service crawling restrictions, a full 45% of C4 is now restricted. If respected or enforced, these restrictions are rapidly biasing the diversity, freshness, and scaling laws for general-purpose AI systems. We hope to illustrate the emerging crises in data consent, for both developers and creators. The foreclosure of much of the open web will impact not only commercial AI, but also non-commercial AI and academic research.

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Slight Corruption in Pre-training Data Makes Better Diffusion Models

  • Hao Chen
  • Yujin Han
  • Diganta Misra
  • Xiang Li
  • Kai Hu
  • Difan Zou
  • Masashi Sugiyama
  • Jindong Wang

Diffusion models (DMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in generating realistic high-quality images, audios, and videos. They benefit significantly from extensive pre-training on large-scale datasets, including web-crawled data with paired data and conditions, such as image-text and image-class pairs. Despite rigorous filtering, these pre-training datasets often inevitably contain corrupted pairs where conditions do not accurately describe the data. This paper presents the first comprehensive study on the impact of such corruption in pre-training data of DMs. We synthetically corrupt ImageNet-1K and CC3M to pre-train and evaluate over $50$ conditional DMs. Our empirical findings reveal that various types of slight corruption in pre-training can significantly enhance the quality, diversity, and fidelity of the generated images across different DMs, both during pre-training and downstream adaptation stages. Theoretically, we consider a Gaussian mixture model and prove that slight corruption in the condition leads to higher entropy and a reduced 2-Wasserstein distance to the ground truth of the data distribution generated by the corruptly trained DMs. Inspired by our analysis, we propose a simple method to improve the training of DMs on practical datasets by adding condition embedding perturbations (CEP). CEP significantly improves the performance of various DMs in both pre-training and downstream tasks. We hope that our study provides new insights into understanding the data and pre-training processes of DMs.

TMLR Journal 2023 Journal Article

Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language models

  • Aarohi Srivastava
  • Abhinav Rastogi
  • Abhishek Rao
  • Abu Awal Md Shoeb
  • Abubakar Abid
  • Adam Fisch
  • Adam R. Brown
  • Adam Santoro

Language models demonstrate both quantitative improvement and new qualitative capabilities with increasing scale. Despite their potentially transformative impact, these new capabilities are as yet poorly characterized. In order to inform future research, prepare for disruptive new model capabilities, and ameliorate socially harmful effects, it is vital that we understand the present and near-future capabilities and limitations of language models. To address this challenge, we introduce the Beyond the Imitation Game benchmark (BIG- bench). BIG-bench currently consists of 204 tasks, contributed by 450 authors across 132 institutions. Task topics are diverse, drawing problems from linguistics, childhood develop- ment, math, common-sense reasoning, biology, physics, social bias, software development, and beyond. BIG-bench focuses on tasks that are believed to be beyond the capabilities of current language models. We evaluate the behavior of OpenAI's GPT models, Google- internal dense transformer architectures, and Switch-style sparse transformers on BIG-bench, across model sizes spanning millions to hundreds of billions of parameters. In addition, a team of human expert raters performed all tasks in order to provide a strong baseline. Findings include: model performance and calibration both improve with scale, but are poor in absolute terms (and when compared with rater performance); performance is remarkably similar across model classes, though with benefits from sparsity; tasks that improve gradually and predictably commonly involve a large knowledge or memorization component, whereas tasks that exhibit "breakthrough" behavior at a critical scale often involve multiple steps or components, or brittle metrics; social bias typically increases with scale in settings with ambiguous context, but this can be improved with prompting.

v2026.09.13