Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

David Leake

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

7 papers
1 author row

Possible papers

7

IJCAI Conference 2025 Conference Paper

EnergyCompress: A General Case Base Learning Strategy

  • Fadi Badra
  • Esteban Marquer
  • Marie-Jeanne Lesot
  • Miguel Couceiro
  • David Leake

Case-based prediction (CBP) methods do not learn a model of the target decision function but instead perform an inference process that depends on two similarity measures and a reference case base. This paper proposes a strategy, called EnergyCompress, to learn an effective case base by selecting relevant cases from an initial set. Use of EnergyCompress decreases CBP inference time, through case base compression, and also increases prediction performance, for a wide variety of CBP algorithms. EnergyCompress relies on the proposition of a general formulation of the CBP task in the framework of energy-based models, which leads to a new and valuable characterization of the notion of competence in case-based reasoning, in particular at the source case level. Extensive experimental results on 18 benchmark datasets comparing EnergyCompress to 5 reference algorithms for case base maintenance support the benefit of the proposed strategy.

IJCAI Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Run Like a Neural Network, Explain Like k-Nearest Neighbor

  • Xiaomeng Ye
  • David Leake
  • Yu Wang
  • David Crandall

Deep neural networks have achieved remarkable performance across a variety of applications. However, their decision-making processes are opaque. In contrast, k-nearest neighbor (k-NN) provides interpretable predictions by relying on similar cases, but it lacks important capabilities of neural networks. The neural network k-nearest neighbor (NN-kNN) model is designed to bridge this gap, combining the benefits of neural networks with the instance-based interpretability of k-NN. However, the initial formulation of NN-kNN had limitations including scalability issues, reliance on surface-level features, and an excessive number of parameters. This paper improves NN-kNN by enhancing its scalability, parameter efficiency, ease of integration with feature extractors, and training simplicity. An evaluation of the revised architecture for image and language classification tasks illustrates its promise as a flexible and interpretable method.

IJCAI Conference 2019 Conference Paper

Unsupervised Hierarchical Temporal Abstraction by Simultaneously Learning Expectations and Representations

  • Katherine Metcalf
  • David Leake

This paper presents ENHAnCE, an algorithm that simultaneously learns a predictive model of the input stream and generates representations of the concepts being observed. Following cognitively-inspired models of event segmentation, ENHAnCE uses expectation violations to identify boundaries between temporally extended patterns. It applies its expectation-driven process at multiple levels of temporal granularity to produce a hierarchy of predictive models that enable it to identify concepts at multiple levels of temporal abstraction. Evaluations show that the temporal abstraction hierarchies generated by ENHAnCE closely match hand-coded hierarchies for the test data streams. Given language data streams, ENHAnCE learns a hierarchy of predictive models that capture basic units of both spoken and written language: morphemes, lexemes, phonemes, syllables, and words.

IJCAI Conference 2017 Conference Paper

Learning and Applying Case Adaptation Rules for Classification: An Ensemble Approach

  • Vahid Jalali
  • David Leake
  • Najmeh Forouzandehmehr

The ability of case-based reasoning systems to solve novel problems depends on their capability to adapt past solutions to new circumstances. However, acquiring the knowledge required for case adaptation is a classic challenge for CBR. This motivates the use of machine learning methods to generate adaptation knowledge. A popular approach uses the case difference heuristic (CDH) to generate adaptation rules from pairs of cases in the case base, based on the premise that the observed differences in case solutions result from the differences in the problems they solve, so can form the basic of rules to adapt cases with similar problem differences. Extensive research has successfully applied the CDH approach to adaptation rule learning for case-based regression (numerical prediction) tasks. However, classification tasks have been outside of its scope. The work presented in this paper addresses that gap by extending CDH-based learning of adaptation rules to apply to cases with categorical features and solutions. It presents the generalized case value heuristic to assess case and solution differences and applies it in an ensemble-based case-based classification method, ensembles of adaptations for classification (EAC), built on the authors' previous work on ensembles of adaptations for regression (EAR). Experimental results support the effectiveness of EAC.

AAAI Conference 2014 Conference Paper

Adaptation-Guided Case Base Maintenance

  • Vahid Jalali
  • David Leake

In case-based reasoning (CBR), problems are solved by retrieving prior cases and adapting their solutions to fit; learning occurs as new cases are stored. Controlling the growth of the case base is a fundamental problem, and research on case-base maintenance has developed methods for compacting case bases while maintaining system competence, primarily by competencebased deletion strategies assuming static case adaptation knowledge. This paper proposes adaptation-guided case-base maintenance (AGCBM), a case-base maintenance approach exploiting the ability to dynamically generate new adaptation knowledge from cases. In AGCBM, case retention decisions are based both on cases’ value as base cases for solving problems and on their value for generating new adaptation rules. The paper illustrates the method for numerical prediction tasks (case-based regression) in which adaptation rules are generated automatically using the case difference heuristic. In comparisons of AGCBM to five alternative methods in four domains, for varying case base densities, AGCBM outperformed the alternatives in all domains, with greatest benefit at high compression.

IJCAI Conference 2011 Conference Paper

Enhancing Case Adaptation with Introspective Reasoning and Web Mining

  • David Leake
  • Jay Powell

Case-based problem-solving systems reason by retrieving relevant prior cases and adapting their solutions to fit new circumstances. The ability of case-based reasoning (CBR) to reason from ungeneralized episodes can benefit knowledge acquisition, but acquiring the needed case adaptation knowledge has proven challenging. This paper presents a method for alleviating this problem with just-in-time gathering of case adaptation knowledge, based on introspective reasoning and mining of Web knowledge sources. The approach combines knowledge planning with introspective reasoning to guide recovery from case adaptation failures and reinforcement learning to guide selection of knowledge sources. The failure recovery and knowledge source selection methods have been tested in three highly different domains with encouraging results. The paper closes with a discussion of limitations and future steps.

KER Journal 2005 Journal Article

Retrieval, reuse, revision and retention in case-based reasoning

  • Ramon Lopez de Mantaras
  • David McSherry
  • Derek Bridge
  • David Leake
  • Barry Smyth
  • Susan Craw
  • Boi Faltings
  • Mary Lou Maher

Case-based reasoning (CBR) is an approach to problem solving that emphasizes the role of prior experience during future problem solving (i.e., new problems are solved by reusing and if necessary adapting the solutions to similar problems that were solved in the past). It has enjoyed considerable success in a wide variety of problem solving tasks and domains. Following a brief overview of the traditional problem-solving cycle in CBR, we examine the cognitive science foundations of CBR and its relationship to analogical reasoning. We then review a representative selection of CBR research in the past few decades on aspects of retrieval, reuse, revision and retention.