Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

David Eriksson

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

15 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

15

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Informed Initialization for Bayesian Optimization and Active Learning

  • Carl Hvarfner
  • David Eriksson
  • Eytan Bakshy
  • Maximilian Balandat

Bayesian Optimization (BO) is a widely used method for optimizing expensive black-box functions, relying on probabilistic surrogate models such as Gaussian Processes (GPs). The quality of the surrogate model is crucial for good optimization performance, especially in the few-shot setting where only a small number of batches of points can be evaluated. In this setting, the initialization plays a critical role in shaping the surrogate's predictive quality and guiding subsequent optimization. Despite this, practitioners typically rely on (quasi-)random designs to cover the input space. However, such approaches neglect two key factors: (a) random designs may not be space-filling, and (b) efficient hyperparameter learning during initialization is essential for high-quality prediction, which may conflict with space-filling designs. To address these limitations, we propose Hyperparameter-Informed Predictive Exploration (HIPE), a novel acquisition strategy that balances space-filling exploration with hyperparameter learning using information-theoretic principles. We derive a closed-form expression for HIPE in the GP setting and demonstrate its effectiveness through extensive experiments in active learning and few-shot BO. Our results show that HIPE outperforms standard initialization strategies in terms of predictive accuracy, hyperparameter identification, and optimization performance, particularly in large-batch, few-shot settings relevant to many real-world BO applications.

ICML Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Scalable Gaussian Processes with Latent Kronecker Structure

  • Jihao Andreas Lin
  • Sebastian Ament
  • Maximilian Balandat
  • David Eriksson
  • José Miguel Hernández-Lobato
  • Eytan Bakshy

Applying Gaussian processes (GPs) to very large datasets remains a challenge due to limited computational scalability. Matrix structures, such as the Kronecker product, can accelerate operations significantly, but their application commonly entails approximations or unrealistic assumptions. In particular, the most common path to creating a Kronecker-structured kernel matrix is by evaluating a product kernel on gridded inputs that can be expressed as a Cartesian product. However, this structure is lost if any observation is missing, breaking the Cartesian product structure, which frequently occurs in real-world data such as time series. To address this limitation, we propose leveraging latent Kronecker structure, by expressing the kernel matrix of observed values as the projection of a latent Kronecker product. In combination with iterative linear system solvers and pathwise conditioning, our method facilitates inference of exact GPs while requiring substantially fewer computational resources than standard iterative methods. We demonstrate that our method outperforms state-of-the-art sparse and variational GPs on real-world datasets with up to five million examples, including robotics, automated machine learning, and climate applications.

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Approximation-Aware Bayesian Optimization

  • Natalie Maus
  • Kyurae Kim
  • Geoff Pleiss
  • David Eriksson
  • John P. Cunningham
  • Jacob R. Gardner

High-dimensional Bayesian optimization (BO) tasks such as molecular design often require $>10, $$000$ function evaluations before obtaining meaningful results. While methods like sparse variational Gaussian processes (SVGPs) reduce computational requirements in these settings, the underlying approximations result in suboptimal data acquisitions that slow the progress of optimization. In this paper we modify SVGPs to better align with the goals of BO: targeting informed data acquisition over global posterior fidelity. Using the framework of utility-calibrated variational inference (Lacoste–Julien et al. , 2011), we unify GP approximation and data acquisition into a joint optimization problem, thereby ensuring optimal decisions under a limited computational budget. Our approach can be used with any decision-theoretic acquisition function and is readily compatible with trust region methods like TuRBO (Eriksson et al. , 2019). We derive efficient joint objectives for the expected improvement (EI) and knowledge gradient (KG) acquisition functions in both the standard and batch BO settings. On a variety of recent high dimensional benchmark tasks in control and molecular design, our approach significantly outperforms standard SVGPs and is capable of achieving comparable rewards with up to $10\times$ fewer function evaluations.

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Robust Gaussian Processes via Relevance Pursuit

  • Sebastian Ament
  • Elizabeth Santorella
  • David Eriksson
  • Ben Letham
  • Maximilian Balandat
  • Eytan Bakshy

Gaussian processes (GPs) are non-parametric probabilistic regression models that are popular due to their flexibility, data efficiency, and well-calibrated uncertainty estimates. However, standard GP models assume homoskedastic Gaussian noise, while many real-world applications are subject to non-Gaussian corruptions. Variants of GPs that are more robust to alternative noise models have been proposed, and entail significant trade-offs between accuracy and robustness, and between computational requirements and theoretical guarantees. In this work, we propose and study a GP model that achieves robustness against sparse outliers by inferring data-point-specific noise levels with a sequential selection procedure maximizing the log marginal likelihood that we refer to as relevance pursuit. We show, surprisingly, that the model can be parameterized such that the associated log marginal likelihood is strongly concave in the data-point-specific noise variances, a property rarely found in either robust regression objectives or GP marginal likelihoods. This in turn implies the weak submodularity of the corresponding subset selection problem, and thereby proves approximation guarantees for the proposed algorithm. We compare the model’s performance relative to other approaches on diverse regression and Bayesian optimization tasks, including the challenging but common setting of sparse corruptions of the labels within or close to the function range.

NeurIPS Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Unexpected Improvements to Expected Improvement for Bayesian Optimization

  • Sebastian Ament
  • Samuel Daulton
  • David Eriksson
  • Maximilian Balandat
  • Eytan Bakshy

Expected Improvement (EI) is arguably the most popular acquisition function in Bayesian optimization and has found countless successful applications, but its performance is often exceeded by that of more recent methods. Notably, EI and its variants, including for the parallel and multi-objective settings, are challenging to optimize because their acquisition values vanish numerically in many regions. This difficulty generally increases as the number of observations, dimensionality of the search space, or the number of constraints grow, resulting in performance that is inconsistent across the literature and most often sub-optimal. Herein, we propose LogEI, a new family of acquisition functions whose members either have identical or approximately equal optima as their canonical counterparts, but are substantially easier to optimize numerically. We demonstrate that numerical pathologies manifest themselves in “classic” analytic EI, Expected Hypervolume Improvement (EHVI), as well as their constrained, noisy, and parallel variants, and propose corresponding reformulations that remedy these pathologies. Our empirical results show that members of the LogEI family of acquisition functions substantially improve on the optimization performance of their canonical counterparts and surprisingly, are on par with or exceed the performance of recent state-of-the-art acquisition functions, highlighting the understated role of numerical optimization in the literature.

NeurIPS Conference 2022 Conference Paper

Bayesian Optimization over Discrete and Mixed Spaces via Probabilistic Reparameterization

  • Samuel Daulton
  • Xingchen Wan
  • David Eriksson
  • Maximilian Balandat
  • Michael A Osborne
  • Eytan Bakshy

Optimizing expensive-to-evaluate black-box functions of discrete (and potentially continuous) design parameters is a ubiquitous problem in scientific and engineering applications. Bayesian optimization (BO) is a popular, sample-efficient method that leverages a probabilistic surrogate model and an acquisition function (AF) to select promising designs to evaluate. However, maximizing the AF over mixed or high-cardinality discrete search spaces is challenging standard gradient-based methods cannot be used directly or evaluating the AF at every point in the search space would be computationally prohibitive. To address this issue, we propose using probabilistic reparameterization (PR). Instead of directly optimizing the AF over the search space containing discrete parameters, we instead maximize the expectation of the AF over a probability distribution defined by continuous parameters. We prove that under suitable reparameterizations, the BO policy that maximizes the probabilistic objective is the same as that which maximizes the AF, and therefore, PR enjoys the same regret bounds as the original BO policy using the underlying AF. Moreover, our approach provably converges to a stationary point of the probabilistic objective under gradient ascent using scalable, unbiased estimators of both the probabilistic objective and its gradient. Therefore, as the number of starting points and gradient steps increase, our approach will recover of a maximizer of the AF (an often-neglected requisite for commonly used BO regret bounds). We validate our approach empirically and demonstrate state-of-the-art optimization performance on a wide range of real-world applications. PR is complementary to (and benefits) recent work and naturally generalizes to settings with multiple objectives and black-box constraints.

UAI Conference 2022 Conference Paper

Multi-objective Bayesian optimization over high-dimensional search spaces

  • Samuel Daulton
  • David Eriksson
  • Maximilian Balandat
  • Eytan Bakshy

Many real world scientific and industrial applications require optimizing multiple competing black-box objectives. When the objectives are expensive-to-evaluate, multi-objective Bayesian optimization (BO) is a popular approach because of its high sample efficiency. However, even with recent methodological advances, most existing multi-objective BO methods perform poorly on search spaces with more than a few dozen parameters and rely on global surrogate models that scale cubically with the number of observations. In this work we propose MORBO, a scalable method for multi-objective BO over high-dimensional search spaces. MORBO identifies diverse globally optimal solutions by performing BO in multiple local regions of the design space in parallel using a coordinated strategy. We show that MORBO significantly advances the state-of-the-art in sample efficiency for several high-dimensional synthetic problems and real world applications, including an optical display design problem and a vehicle design problem with 146 and 222 parameters, respectively. On these problems, where existing BO algorithms fail to scale and perform well, MORBO provides practitioners with order-of-magnitude improvements in sample efficiency over the current approach.

UAI Conference 2021 Conference Paper

A Nonmyopic Approach to Cost-Constrained Bayesian Optimization

  • Eric Hans Lee
  • David Eriksson
  • Valerio Perrone
  • Matthias W. Seeger

Bayesian optimization (BO) is a popular method for optimizing expensive-to-evaluate black-box functions. BO budgets are typically given in iterations, which implicitly assumes each evaluation has the same cost. In fact, in many BO applications, evaluation costs vary significantly in different regions of the search space. In hyperparameter optimization, the time spent on neural network training increases with layer size; in clinical trials, the monetary cost of drug compounds vary; and in optimal control, control actions have differing complexities. Cost-constrained BO measures convergence with alternative cost metrics such as time, money, or energy, for which the sample efficiency of standard BO methods is ill-suited. For cost-constrained BO, cost efficiency is far more important than sample efficiency. In this paper, we formulate cost-constrained BO as a constrained Markov decision process (CMDP), and develop an efficient rollout approximation to the optimal CMDP policy that takes both the cost and future iterations into account. We validate our method on a collection of hyperparameter optimization problems as well as a sensor set selection application.

UAI Conference 2021 Conference Paper

High-dimensional Bayesian optimization with sparse axis-aligned subspaces

  • David Eriksson
  • Martin Jankowiak

Bayesian optimization (BO) is a powerful paradigm for efficient optimization of black-box objective functions. High-dimensional BO presents a particular challenge, in part because the curse of dimensionality makes it difficult to define—as well as do inference over—a suitable class of surrogate models. We argue that Gaussian process surrogate models defined on sparse axis-aligned subspaces offer an attractive compromise between flexibility and parsimony. We demonstrate that our approach, which relies on Hamiltonian Monte Carlo for inference, can rapidly identify sparse subspaces relevant to modeling the unknown objective function, enabling sample-efficient high-dimensional BO. In an extensive suite of experiments comparing to existing methods for high-dimensional BO we demonstrate that our algorithm, Sparse Axis-Aligned Subspace BO (SAASBO), achieves excellent performance on several synthetic and real-world problems without the need to set problem-specific hyperparameters.

UAI Conference 2020 Conference Paper

Efficient Rollout Strategies for Bayesian Optimization

  • Eric Hans Lee
  • David Eriksson
  • David Bindel
  • Bolong Cheng
  • Mike Mccourt

Bayesian optimization (BO) is a class of sample-efficient global optimization methods, where a probabilistic model conditioned on previous observations is used to determine future evaluations via the optimization of an acquisition function. Most acquisition functions are myopic, meaning that they only consider the impact of the next function evaluation. Non-myopic acquisition functions consider the impact of the next h function evaluations and are typically computed through rollout, in which h steps of BO are simulated. These rollout acquisition functions are defined as h-dimensional integrals, and are expensive to compute and optimize. We show that a combination of quasi-Monte Carlo, common random numbers, and control variates significantly reduce the computational burden of rollout. We then formulate a policy-search based approach that removes the need to optimize the rollout acquisition function. Finally, we discuss the qualitative behavior of rollout policies in the setting of multi-modal objectives and model error.

NeurIPS Conference 2020 Conference Paper

Fast Matrix Square Roots with Applications to Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Optimization

  • Geoff Pleiss
  • Martin Jankowiak
  • David Eriksson
  • Anil Damle
  • Jacob Gardner

Matrix square roots and their inverses arise frequently in machine learning, e. g. , when sampling from high-dimensional Gaussians N(0, K) or “whitening” a vector b against covariance matrix K. While existing methods typically require O(N^3) computation, we introduce a highly-efficient quadratic-time algorithm for computing K^{1/2}b, K^{-1/2}b, and their derivatives through matrix-vector multiplication (MVMs). Our method combines Krylov subspace methods with a rational approximation and typically achieves 4 decimal places of accuracy with fewer than 100 MVMs. Moreover, the backward pass requires little additional computation. We demonstrate our method's applicability on matrices as large as 50, 000 by 50, 000 - well beyond traditional methods - with little approximation error. Applying this increased scalability to variational Gaussian processes, Bayesian optimization, and Gibbs sampling results in more powerful models with higher accuracy. In particular, we perform variational GP inference with up to 10, 000 inducing points and perform Gibbs sampling on a 25, 000-dimensional problem.

NeurIPS Conference 2019 Conference Paper

Scalable Global Optimization via Local Bayesian Optimization

  • David Eriksson
  • Michael Pearce
  • Jacob Gardner
  • Ryan Turner
  • Matthias Poloczek

Bayesian optimization has recently emerged as a popular method for the sample-efficient optimization of expensive black-box functions. However, the application to high-dimensional problems with several thousand observations remains challenging, and on difficult problems Bayesian optimization is often not competitive with other paradigms. In this paper we take the view that this is due to the implicit homogeneity of the global probabilistic models and an overemphasized exploration that results from global acquisition. This motivates the design of a local probabilistic approach for global optimization of large-scale high-dimensional problems. We propose the TuRBO algorithm that fits a collection of local models and performs a principled global allocation of samples across these models via an implicit bandit approach. A comprehensive evaluation demonstrates that TuRBO outperforms state-of-the-art methods from machine learning and operations research on problems spanning reinforcement learning, robotics, and the natural sciences.

NeurIPS Conference 2018 Conference Paper

Scaling Gaussian Process Regression with Derivatives

  • David Eriksson
  • Kun Dong
  • Eric Lee
  • David Bindel
  • Andrew Wilson

Gaussian processes (GPs) with derivatives are useful in many applications, including Bayesian optimization, implicit surface reconstruction, and terrain reconstruction. Fitting a GP to function values and derivatives at $n$ points in $d$ dimensions requires linear solves and log determinants with an ${n(d+1) \times n(d+1)}$ positive definite matrix-- leading to prohibitive $\mathcal{O}(n^3d^3)$ computations for standard direct methods. We propose iterative solvers using fast $\mathcal{O}(nd)$ matrix-vector multiplications (MVMs), together with pivoted Cholesky preconditioning that cuts the iterations to convergence by several orders of magnitude, allowing for fast kernel learning and prediction. Our approaches, together with dimensionality reduction, allows us to scale Bayesian optimization with derivatives to high-dimensional problems and large evaluation budgets.

NeurIPS Conference 2017 Conference Paper

Scalable Log Determinants for Gaussian Process Kernel Learning

  • Kun Dong
  • David Eriksson
  • Hannes Nickisch
  • David Bindel
  • Andrew Wilson

For applications as varied as Bayesian neural networks, determinantal point processes, elliptical graphical models, and kernel learning for Gaussian processes (GPs), one must compute a log determinant of an n by n positive definite matrix, and its derivatives---leading to prohibitive O(n^3) computations. We propose novel O(n) approaches to estimating these quantities from only fast matrix vector multiplications (MVMs). These stochastic approximations are based on Chebyshev, Lanczos, and surrogate models, and converge quickly even for kernel matrices that have challenging spectra. We leverage these approximations to develop a scalable Gaussian process approach to kernel learning. We find that Lanczos is generally superior to Chebyshev for kernel learning, and that a surrogate approach can be highly efficient and accurate with popular kernels.

YNIMG Journal 2017 Journal Article

Selective interhemispheric circuits account for a cardinal bias in spontaneous activity within early visual areas

  • Tiago Siebert Altavini
  • Sergio Andres Conde-Ocazionez
  • David Eriksson
  • Thomas Wunderle
  • Kerstin Erika Schmidt

Ongoing brain activity exhibits patterns resembling neural ensembles co-activated by stimulation or task performance. Such patterns have been attributed to the brain's functional architecture, e. g. selective long-range connections. Here, we directly investigate the contribution of selective connections between hemispheres to spontaneous and evoked maps in cat area 18 close to the 17/18 border. We recorded voltage-sensitive dye imaging maps and spiking activity while manipulating interhemispheric input by reversibly deactivating corresponding contralateral areas. During deactivation, spontaneous maps continued to be generated with similar frequency and quality as in the intact network but a baseline cardinal bias disappeared. Consistently, neurons preferring either horizontal (HN) or vertical (VN), as opposed to oblique contours, decreased their resting state activity. HN decreased their rates also when stimulated visually. We conclude that structured spontaneous maps are primarily generated by thalamo- and/or intracortical connectivity. However, selective long-range connections through the corpus callosum – in perpetuation of the long-range intracortical network – contribute to a cardinal bias, possibly, because they are stronger or more frequent between neurons preferring horizontal and/or cardinal contours. As those contours are easier perceived and appear more frequently in natural environment, long-range connections might provide visual cortex with a grid for probabilistic grouping operations in a larger visual scene.

v2026.09.13