Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Daniel Liang

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

2 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

2

AAMAS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Reinforcement Learning Based Simulated Annealing

  • Nathan Qiu
  • Daniel Liang

Simulated Annealing (SA) is a stochastic optimization algorithm widely employed to approximate the global optimum of an energy function in both discrete and continuous problem domains. As an extension of conventional gradient descent methods, SA probabilistically accepts worse solutions to escape local optima, thereby enhancing the exploration of the solution space. SA’s performance is highly contingent upon specific components, notably the neighbor proposal distribution and the temperature annealing schedule. Recent advancements such as Neural SA have improved upon traditional SA by adopting a reinforcement learning perspective, interpreting the neighbor proposal distribution as a learnable policy. Neural SA outperforms vanilla SA algorithms across various combinatorial optimization benchmarks and exhibits scalability and computational efficiency for larger problems. However, its performance remains inferior to standard commercial solvers, and it is not very generalizable across continuous problems. In this work, we introduce Reinforcement Learning Based Simulated Annealing (RL Based SA), a significant enhancement over Neural SA in terms of performance and generalizability. RL Based SA modifies the state parameters to include the change in energy from SA. It also replaces the multilayer perceptron neural networks trained using proximal policy optimization (PPO) with long short-term memory (LSTM) neural networks. This substitution enables the processing of timeseries inputs of variable lengths, allowing the utilization of the entire SA rollout as input. We demonstrate that RL Based SA achieves superior results over Neural SA, vanilla SA, and adaptive SA, while attaining performance comparable to standard solvers in terms of solution quality and runtime across a spectrum of discrete and continuous problems. The benchmarks evaluated include the Knapsack, Bin Packing, and Traveling Salesperson problems, as well as continuous optimization functions such as Rosenbrock, Ackley, and Eggholder functions, and we presented training and convergence time comparisons on each function to highlight the computational trade-offs of our approach. Additionally, we show that RL Based SA is generalizable across different continuous problems, robustly scalable with respect to problem size, and computationally efficient.

STOC Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Improved Stabilizer Estimation via Bell Difference Sampling

  • Sabee Grewal
  • Vishnu Iyer
  • William Kretschmer
  • Daniel Liang

We study the complexity of learning quantum states in various models with respect to the stabilizer formalism and obtain the following results: We prove that Ω( n ) T -gates are necessary for any Clifford+ T circuit to prepare computationally pseudorandom quantum states, an exponential improvement over the previously known bound. This bound is asymptotically tight if linear-time quantum-secure pseudorandom functions exist. Given an n -qubit pure quantum state |ψ⟩ that has fidelity at least τ with some stabilizer state, we give an algorithm that outputs a succinct description of a stabilizer state that witnesses fidelity at least τ − ε. The algorithm uses O ( n /(ε 2 τ 4 )) samples and exp( O ( n /τ 4 )) / ε 2 time. In the regime of τ constant, this algorithm estimates stabilizer fidelity substantially faster than the naive exp( O ( n 2 ))-time brute-force algorithm over all stabilizer states. In the special case of τ > cos 2 (π/8), we show that a modification of the above algorithm runs in polynomial time. We exhibit a tolerant property testing algorithm for stabilizer states. The underlying algorithmic primitive in all of our results is Bell difference sampling. To prove our results, we establish and/or strengthen connections between Bell difference sampling, symplectic Fourier analysis, and graph theory.

v2026.09.13