Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Daniel Faria

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

4 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

4

ECAI Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Complex Multi-Ontology Alignment Through Geometric Operations on Language Embeddings

  • Marta Contreiras Silva
  • Daniel Faria
  • Catia Pesquita

With knowledge graphs increasing in popularity, aligning and integrating them is paramount to ensure their usefulness and reusability. A key step in this process is ontology matching, whereby the semantic models of KGs are aligned into a single cohesive semantic backbone. While finding simple pairwise equivalences between entities in two ontologies is well addressed by state-of-the-art algorithms, finding more complex mappings that can include multiple entities from different ontologies is far from solved, despite their importance in ensuring a deep and meaningful integration of KGs. We propose a novel complex ontology matching approach that explores geometric operations over the shared semantic space afforded by large language models, enabling the discovery of complex mappings that are missed by purely lexical approaches. We evaluate our approach on several biomedical ontologies using partial reference alignments and manual expert validation. Our approach improves on the performance of a purely lexical approach while also increasing the coverage of complex multi-ontology alignments by 20 to 80%, which translates to a 97% coverage of the source ontologies. Moreover, the manual evaluation of the mappings produced by LLM shows that it achieves a high level of precision. This work demonstrates that the use of LLMs can improve on the performance of traditional lexical strategies.

KER Journal 2020 Journal Article

Crowd-assessing quality in uncertain data linking datasets

  • Daniel Faria
  • Alfio Ferrara
  • Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz
  • STEFANO MONTANELLI
  • Catia Pesquita

Abstract The quality of a dataset used for evaluating data linking methods, techniques, and tools depends on the availability of a set of mappings, called reference alignment, that is known to be correct. In particular, it is crucial that mappings effectively represent relations between pairs of entities that are indeed similar due to the fact that they denote the same object. Since the reliability of mappings is decisive in order to perform a fair evaluation of automatic linking methods and tools, we call this property of mappings as mapping fairness. In this article, we propose a crowd-based approach, called Crowd Quality ( CQ ), for assessing the quality of data linking datasets by measuring the fairness of the mappings in the reference alignment. Moreover, we present a real experiment, where we evaluate two state-of-the-art data linking tools before and after the refinement of the reference alignment based on the CQ approach, in order to present the benefits deriving from the crowd assessment of mapping fairness.

KER Journal 2020 Journal Article

Towards evaluating complex ontology alignments

  • Lu Zhou
  • Elodie Thiéblin
  • Michelle Cheatham
  • Daniel Faria
  • Catia Pesquita
  • Cassia Trojahn
  • Ondřej Zamazal

Abstract The development of semi-automated and automated ontology alignment techniques is an important part of realizing the potential of the Semantic Web. Until very recently, most existing work in this area was focused on finding simple (1:1) equivalence correspondences between two ontologies. However, many real-world ontology pairs involve correspondences that contain multiple entities from each ontology. These ‘complex’ alignments pose a challenge for existing evaluation approaches, which hinders the development of new systems capable of finding such correspondences. This position paper surveys and analyzes the requirements for effective evaluation of complex ontology alignments and assesses the degree to which these requirements are met by existing approaches. It also provides a roadmap for future work on this topic taking into consideration emerging community initiatives and major challenges that need to be addressed.

KER Journal 2019 Journal Article

User validation in ontology alignment: functional assessment and impact

  • Huanyu Li
  • Zlatan Dragisic
  • Daniel Faria
  • Valentina Ivanova
  • Ernesto Jiménez-Ruiz
  • Patrick Lambrix
  • Catia Pesquita

Abstract User validation is one of the challenges facing the ontology alignment community, as there are limits to the quality of the alignments produced by automated alignment algorithms. In this paper, we present a broad study on user validation of ontology alignments that encompasses three distinct but inter-related aspects: the profile of the user, the services of the alignment system, and its user interface. We discuss key issues pertaining to the alignment validation process under each of these aspects and provide an overview of how current systems address them. Finally, we use experiments from the Interactive Matching track of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2015–2018 to assess the impact of errors in alignment validation, and how systems cope with them as function of their services.

v2026.09.13