Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Daniel Corkill

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

3 papers
1 author row

Possible papers

3

AAMAS Conference 2013 Conference Paper

Biasing the Behavior of Organizationally Adept Agents

  • Daniel Corkill
  • Chongjie Zhang
  • Bruno da Silva
  • Yoonheui Kim
  • Daniel Garant
  • Victor R. Lesser
  • Xiaoqin Zhang

An organizationally adept agent (OAA) adjusts its behavior when given annotated organizational guidelines. More importantly, it can also determine when such guidelines become ineffective and proactively adapt its behavior to better achieve organizational objectives. We present the high-level aspects of this architecture and analyze its effectiveness using call-center OAAs striving to extinguish fires in RoboCup Rescue scenarios.

TIST Journal 2012 Journal Article

An Ensemble Architecture for Learning Complex Problem-Solving Techniques from Demonstration

  • Xiaoqin Shelley Zhang
  • Bhavesh Shrestha
  • Sungwook Yoon
  • Subbarao Kambhampati
  • Phillip DiBona
  • Jinhong K. Guo
  • Daniel McFarlane
  • Martin O. Hofmann

We present a novel ensemble architecture for learning problem-solving techniques from a very small number of expert solutions and demonstrate its effectiveness in a complex real-world domain. The key feature of our “Generalized Integrated Learning Architecture” (GILA) is a set of heterogeneous independent learning and reasoning (ILR) components, coordinated by a central meta-reasoning executive (MRE). The ILRs are weakly coupled in the sense that all coordination during learning and performance happens through the MRE. Each ILR learns independently from a small number of expert demonstrations of a complex task. During performance, each ILR proposes partial solutions to subproblems posed by the MRE, which are then selected from and pieced together by the MRE to produce a complete solution. The heterogeneity of the learner-reasoners allows both learning and problem solving to be more effective because their abilities and biases are complementary and synergistic. We describe the application of this novel learning and problem solving architecture to the domain of airspace management, where multiple requests for the use of airspaces need to be deconflicted, reconciled, and managed automatically. Formal evaluations show that our system performs as well as or better than humans after learning from the same training data. Furthermore, GILA outperforms any individual ILR run in isolation, thus demonstrating the power of the ensemble architecture for learning and problem solving.

JAAMAS Journal 2007 Journal Article

Automated organization design for multi-agent systems

  • Mark Sims
  • Daniel Corkill
  • Victor Lesser

Abstract The ability to create effective multi-agent organizations is key to the development of larger, more diverse multi-agent systems. In this article we present KB-ORG: a fully automated, knowledge-based organization designer for multi-agent systems. Organization design is the process that accepts organizational goals, environmental expectations, performance requirements, role characterizations, and agent descriptions and assigns roles to each agent. These long-term roles serve as organizational-control guidelines that are used by each agent in making moment-to-moment operational control decisions. An important aspect of KB-ORG is its efficient, knowledge-informed search process for designing multi-agent organizations. KB-ORG uses both application-level and coordination-level organization design knowledge to explore the combinatorial search space of candidate organizations selectively. KB-ORG also delays making coordination-level organizational decisions until it has explored and elaborated candidate application-level agent roles. This approach significantly reduces the exploration effort required to produce effective designs as compared to modeling and evaluation-based approaches that do not incorporate design expertise. KB-ORG designs are not restricted to a single organization form such as a hierarchy, and the organization designs described here contain both hierarchical and peer-to-peer elements. We use examples from the distributed sensor network (DSN) domain to show how KB-ORG uses situational parameters as well as application-level and coordination-level knowledge to generate organization designs. We also show that KB-ORG designs effective, yet substantially different, organizations when given different organizational requirements and environmental expectations.

v2026.09.13