Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Cristobal Rojas

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

7 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

7

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Continuity and Isolation Lead to Doubts or Dilemmas in Large Language Models

  • Hector Pasten
  • Felipe Urrutia
  • Hector Orellana
  • Cristian Buc Calderon
  • Cristobal Rojas
  • Alexander Kozachinskiy

Understanding how Transformers work and how they process information is key to the theoretical and empirical advancement of these machines. In this work, we demonstrate the existence of two phenomena in Transformers, namely isolation and continuity. Both of these phenomena hinder Transformers to learn even simple pattern sequences. Isolation expresses that any learnable sequence must be isolated from another learnable sequence, and hence some sequences cannot be learned by a single Transformer at the same time. Continuity entails that an attractor basin forms around a learned sequence, such that any sequence falling in that basin will collapse towards the learned sequence. Here, we mathematically prove these phenomena emerge in all Transformers that use compact positional encoding, and design rigorous experiments, demonstrating that the theoretical limitations we shed light on occur on the practical scale.

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Strassen Attention, Split VC Dimension and Compositionality in Transformers

  • Alexander Kozachinskiy
  • Felipe Urrutia
  • Hector Orellana
  • Tomasz Steifer
  • Germán Pizarro
  • Matías Fuentes
  • Francisco Meza Vásquez
  • Cristian Buc Calderon

We propose the first method to show theoretical limitations for one-layer softmax transformers with arbitrarily many precision bits (even infinite). We establish those limitations for three tasks that require advanced reasoning. The first task, Match 3 (Sanford et al. , 2023), requires looking at all possible token triplets in an input sequence. The second and third tasks address compositionality-based reasoning: function composition (Peng et al. , 2024) and binary relations composition, respectively. We formally prove the inability of one-layer softmax Transformers to solve any of these tasks. To overcome these limitations, we introduce Strassen attention and prove that, equipped with this mechanism, a one-layer transformer can in principle solve all these tasks. Importantly, we show that it enjoys sub-cubic running-time complexity, making it more scalable than similar previously proposed mechanisms, such as higher-order attention (Sanford et al. , 2023). To complement our theoretical findings, we experimentally studied Strassen attention and compared it against standard (Vaswani et al, 2017), higher-order attention (Sanford et al. , 2023), and triangular attention (Bergen et al. 2021). Our results help to disentangle all these attention mechanisms, highlighting their strengths and limitations. In particular, Strassen attention outperforms standard attention significantly on all the tasks. Altogether, understanding the theoretical limitations can guide research towards scalable attention mechanisms that improve the reasoning abilities of Transformers.

ICML Conference 2024 Conference Paper

On dimensionality of feature vectors in MPNNs

  • César Bravo
  • Alexander Kozachinskiy
  • Cristobal Rojas

We revisit the result of Morris et al. (AAAI’19) that message-passing graphs neural networks (MPNNs) are equal in their distinguishing power to the Weisfeiler–Leman (WL) isomorphism test. Morris et al. show their result with ReLU activation function and $O(n)$-dimensional feature vectors, where $n$ is the size of the graph. Recently, by introducing randomness into the architecture, Aamand et al. (NeurIPS’22) improved this bound to $O(\log n)$-dimensional feature vectors, although at the expense of guaranteeing perfect simulation only with high probability. In all these constructions, to guarantee equivalence to the WL test, the dimension of feature vectors in the MPNN has to increase with the size of the graphs. However, architectures used in practice have feature vectors of constant dimension. Thus, there is a gap between the guarantees provided by these results and the actual characteristics of architectures used in practice. In this paper we close this gap by showing that, for any non-polynomial analytic (like the sigmoid) activation function, to guarantee that MPNNs are equivalent to the WL test, feature vectors of dimension $d=1$ is all we need, independently of the size of the graphs. Our main technical insight is that for simulating multi-sets in the WL-test, it is enough to use linear independence of feature vectors over rationals instead of reals. Countability of the set of rationals together with nice properties of analytic functions allow us to carry out the simulation invariant over the iterations of the WL test without increasing the dimension of the feature vectors.

ECAI Conference 2023 Conference Paper

No Agreement Without Loss: Learning and Social Choice in Peer Review

  • Pablo Barceló
  • Mauricio Duarte
  • Cristobal Rojas
  • Tomasz Steifer

In peer review systems, reviewers are often asked to evaluate various features of submissions, such as technical quality or novelty. A score is given to each of the predefined features and based on these the reviewer has to provide an overall quantitative recommendation. It may be assumed that each reviewer has her own mapping from the set of features to a recommendation, and that different reviewers have different mappings in mind. This introduces an element of arbitrariness known as commensuration bias. In this paper we discuss a framework, introduced by Noothigattu, Shah and Procaccia, and then applied by the organizers of the AAAI 2022 conference. Noothigattu, Shah and Procaccia proposed to aggregate reviewer’s mapping by minimizing certain loss functions, and studied axiomatic properties of this approach, in the sense of social choice theory. We challenge several of the results and assumptions used in their work and report a number of negative results. On the one hand, we study a trade-off between some of the axioms proposed and the ability of the method to properly capture agreements of the majority of reviewers. On the other hand, we show that dropping a certain unrealistic assumption has dramatic effects, including causing the method to be discontinuous.

NeurIPS Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Three Iterations of (d − 1)-WL Test Distinguish Non Isometric Clouds of d-dimensional Points

  • Valentino Delle Rose
  • Alexander Kozachinskiy
  • Cristobal Rojas
  • Mircea Petrache
  • Pablo Barceló

The Weisfeiler-Lehman (WL) test is a fundamental iterative algorithm for checking the isomorphism of graphs. It has also been observed that it underlies the design of several graph neural network architectures, whose capabilities and performance can be understood in terms of the expressive power of this test. Motivated by recent developments in machine learning applications to datasets involving three-dimensional objects, we study when the WL test is {\em complete} for clouds of Euclidean points represented by complete distance graphs, i. e. , when it can distinguish, up to isometry, any arbitrary such cloud. Our main result states that the $(d-1)$-dimensional WL test is complete for point clouds in $d$-dimensional Euclidean space, for any $d\ge 2$, and only three iterations of the test suffice. Our result is tight for $d = 2, 3$. We also observe that the $d$-dimensional WL test only requires one iteration to achieve completeness.

STOC Conference 2020 Conference Paper

How to lose at Monte Carlo: a simple dynamical system whose typical statistical behavior is non-computable

  • Cristobal Rojas
  • Michael Yampolsky

We consider the simplest non-linear discrete dynamical systems, given by the logistic maps f a ( x )= ax (1− x ) of the interval [0,1]. We show that there exist real parameters a ∈ (0,4) for which almost every orbit of f a has the same statistical distribution in [0,1], but this limiting distribution is not Turing computable. In particular, the Monte Carlo method cannot be applied to study these dynamical systems.

v2026.09.13