Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Cornelius Emde

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

5 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

5

ICLR Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Benchmarking Predictive Coding Networks - Made Simple

  • Luca Pinchetti
  • Chang Qi
  • Oleh Lokshyn
  • Cornelius Emde
  • Amine M'Charrak
  • Mufeng Tang
  • Simon Frieder
  • Bayar Menzat

In this work, we tackle the problems of efficiency and scalability for predictive coding networks (PCNs) in machine learning. To do so, we propose a library that focuses on performance and simplicity, and use it to implement a large set of standard benchmarks for the community to use for their experiments. As most works in the field propose their own tasks and architectures, do not compare one against each other, and focus on small-scale tasks, a simple and fast open-source library, and a comprehensive set of benchmarks, would address all of these concerns. Then, we perform extensive tests on such benchmarks using both existing algorithms for PCNs, as well as adaptations of other methods popular in the bio-plausible deep learning community. All of this has allowed us to (i) test architectures much larger than commonly used in the literature, on more complex datasets; (ii) reach new state-of-the-art results in all of the tasks and dataset provided; (iii) clearly highlight what the current limitations of PCNs are, allowing us to state important future research directions. With the hope of galvanizing community efforts towards one of the main open problems in the field, scalability, we will release the code, tests, and benchmarks.

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Measuring what Matters: Construct Validity in Large Language Model Benchmarks

  • Andrew M. Bean
  • Ryan Othniel Kearns
  • Angelika Romanou
  • Franziska Sofia Hafner
  • Harry Mayne
  • Jan Batzner
  • Negar Foroutan Eghlidi
  • Chris Schmitz

Evaluating large language models (LLMs) is crucial for both assessing their capabilities and identifying safety or robustness issues prior to deployment. Reliably measuring abstract and complex phenomena such as safety' and robustness' requires strong construct validity, that is, having measures that represent what matters to the phenomenon. With a team of 29 expert reviewers, we conduct a systematic review of 445 LLM benchmarks from leading conferences in natural language processing and machine learning. Across the reviewed articles, we find patterns related to the measured phenomena, tasks, and scoring metrics which undermine the validity of the resulting claims. To address these shortcomings, we provide eight key recommendations and detailed actionable guidance to researchers and practitioners in developing LLM benchmarks.

ICLR Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Shh, don't say that! Domain Certification in LLMs

  • Cornelius Emde
  • Alasdair Paren
  • Preetham Arvind
  • Maxime Guillaume Kayser
  • Tom Rainforth
  • Thomas Lukasiewicz
  • Philip H. S. Torr
  • Adel Bibi

Large language models (LLMs) are often deployed to do constrained tasks, with narrow domains. For example, customer support bots can be built on top of LLMs, relying on their broad language understanding and capabilities to enhance performance. However, these LLMs are adversarially susceptible, potentially generating outputs outside the intended domain. To formalize, assess and mitigate this risk, we introduce domain certification; a guarantee that accurately characterizes the out-of-domain behavior of language models. We then propose a simple yet effective approach dubbed VALID that provides adversarial bounds as a certificate. Finally, we evaluate our method across a diverse set of datasets, demonstrating that it yields meaningful certificates.

ICLR Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Towards Certification of Uncertainty Calibration under Adversarial Attacks

  • Cornelius Emde
  • Francesco Pinto
  • Thomas Lukasiewicz
  • Philip H. S. Torr
  • Adel Bibi

Since neural classifiers are known to be sensitive to adversarial perturbations that alter their accuracy, certification methods have been developed to provide provable guarantees on the insensitivity of their predictions to such perturbations. On the other hand, in safety-critical applications, the frequentist interpretation of the confidence of a classifier (also known as model calibration) can be of utmost importance. This property can be measured via the Brier score or the expected calibration error. We show that attacks can significantly harm calibration, and thus propose certified calibration providing worst-case bounds on calibration under adversarial perturbations. Specifically, we produce analytic bounds for the Brier score and approximate bounds via the solution of a mixed-integer program on the expected calibration error. Finally, we propose novel calibration attacks and demonstrate how they can improve model calibration through adversarial calibration training. The code will be publicly released upon acceptance.

ICLR Conference 2024 Conference Paper

A Stable, Fast, and Fully Automatic Learning Algorithm for Predictive Coding Networks

  • Tommaso Salvatori
  • Yuhang Song 0001
  • Yordan Yordanov
  • Beren Millidge
  • Lei Sha
  • Cornelius Emde
  • Zhenghua Xu 0001
  • Rafal Bogacz

Predictive coding networks are neuroscience-inspired models with roots in both Bayesian statistics and neuroscience. Training such models, however, is quite inefficient and unstable. In this work, we show how by simply changing the temporal scheduling of the update rule for the synaptic weights leads to an algorithm that is much more efficient and stable than the original one, and has theoretical guarantees in terms of convergence. The proposed algorithm, that we call incremental predictive coding (iPC) is also more biologically plausible than the original one, as it it fully automatic. In an extensive set of experiments, we show that iPC constantly performs better than the original formulation on a large number of benchmarks for image classification, as well as for the training of both conditional and masked language models, in terms of test accuracy, efficiency, and convergence with respect to a large set of hyperparameters.

v2026.09.13