Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

CHRIS PREIST

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

5 papers
1 author row

Possible papers

5

JAAMAS Journal 2026 Journal Article

A Manifesto for Agent Technology: Towards Next Generation Computing

  • Michael Luck
  • Peter McBurney
  • CHRIS PREIST

Abstract The European Commission's eEurope initiative aims to bring every citizen, home, school, business and administration online to create a digitally literate Europe. The value lies not in the objective itself, but in its ability to facilitate the advance of Europe into new ways of living and working. Just as in the first literacy revolution, our lives will change in ways never imagined. The vision of eEurope is underpinned by a technological infrastructure that is now taken for granted. Yet it provides us with the ability to pioneer radical new ways of doing business, of undertaking science, and, of managing our everyday activities. Key to this step change is the development of appropriate mechanisms to automate and improve existing tasks, to anticipate desired actions on our behalf (as human users) and to undertake them, while at the same time enabling us to stay involved and retain as much control as required. For many, these mechanisms are now being realised by agent technologies, which are already providing dramatic and sustained benefits in several business and industry domains, including B2B exchanges, supply chain management, car manufacturing, and so on. While there are many real successes of agent technologies to report, there is still much to be done in research and development for the full benefits to be achieved. This is especially true in the context of environments of pervasive computing devices that are envisaged in coming years. This paper describes the current state-of-the-art of agent technologies and identifies trends and challenges that will need to be addressed over the next 10 years to progress the field and realise the benefits. It offers a roadmap that is the result of discussions among participants from over 150 organisations including universities, research institutions, large multinational corporations and smaller IT start-up companies. The roadmap identifies successes and challenges, and points to future possibilities and demands; agent technologies are fundamental to the realisation of next generation computing.

KER Journal 2000 Journal Article

Progress in multi-agent systems research

  • Omer Rana
  • CHRIS PREIST
  • Michael Luck

Continuing the series of workshops begun in 1996 (Luck, 1997; Doran et al., 1997; d'Inverno et al., 1997; Fisher et al., 1997) and held in each of the two years since (Luck et al., 1998; Aylett et al., 1998; Binmore et al., 1998; Decker et al., 1999; Beer et al., 1999), the 1999 workshop of the UK Special Interest Group on Multi-Agent Systems (UKMAS'99) took place in Bristol in December. Chaired and organised by Chris Preist of Hewlett Packard Laboratories, with support from both HP and BT Laboratories, the workshop brought together a diverse range of participants, from the agent community in both the UK and abroad, to discuss and present work spanning all areas of agent research. Although dominated by computer scientists, also present at the meeting were electronic engineers, computational biologists, philosophers, sociologists, statisticians, game-theorists, economists and behavioural scientists, with both academia and industry well represented. Indeed, numbers attending these workshops continue to grow, reflecting the continued and rising interest in agent-based systems. The meeting truly demonstrated the wider view of what the term “agency” implied to research in other disciplines and the questions raised at the end of presentations were a pertinent reminder of the diversity of the audience.

KER Journal 1999 Journal Article

Making money from agents

  • Dave Cliff
  • JÖRG MÜLLER
  • Divine Ndumu
  • CHRIS PREIST
  • Mike Wooldridge

The discipline of agent technology is becoming a mature research area, both from a scientific and anengineering perspective. Strong theoretical and empirical analysis, together with practical experience of deploying systems to solve real problems, give this community the opportunity to make animpact in the world of business. At UKMAS'98, a panel of academics and industrialists met todiscuss exactly how this could be done; how could agents and multi-agent systems be used toactually make money?

KER Journal 1999 Journal Article

Negotiation in multi-agent systems

  • Martin Beer
  • MARK D'INVERNO
  • Michael Luck
  • NICK JENNINGS
  • CHRIS PREIST
  • MICHAEL SCHROEDER

In systems composed of multiple autonomous agents, negotiation is a key form of interaction thatenables groups of agents to arrive at a mutual agreement regarding some belief, goal or plan, forexample. Particularly because the agents are autonomous and cannot be assumed to bebenevolent, agents must influence others to convince them to act in certain ways, and negotiationis thus critical for managing such inter-agent dependencies. The process of negotiation may be ofmany different forms, such as auctions, protocols in the style of the contract net, and argumentation, but it is unclear just how sophisticated the agents or the protocols for interaction must be forsuccessful negotiation in different contexts. All these issues were raised in the panel session onnegotiation.

KER Journal 1998 Journal Article

Agent Systems and Applications

  • RUTH AYLETT
  • Frances Brazier
  • NICK JENNINGS
  • Michael Luck
  • HYACINTH NWANA
  • CHRIS PREIST

As the number of deployed multi-agent applications increases, further and better experience with the technology is gained, enabling a strong evaluation of the field from a more practical perspective. In particular, questions relating to how the theory of multi-agent systems impacts on practice, and how the practical development itself compares with other technologies, can be answered in the light of a heightened level of maturity. Given the tensions between theoreticians and practitioners in computing in general, let alone their spats in AI or multi-agent systems in particular, the discussion on agent systems and applications was both vigorous and enthusiastic

v2026.09.13