Author name cluster

Charles Marx

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

4 papers

2 author rows

TMLR Journal 2025 Journal Article

Calibrated Probabilistic Forecasts for Arbitrary Sequences

Charles Marx
Volodymyr Kuleshov
Stefano Ermon

Real-world data streams can change unpredictably due to distribution shifts, feedback loops and adversarial actors, which challenges the validity of forecasts. We present a forecasting framework ensuring valid uncertainty estimates regardless of how data evolves. Leveraging the concept of Blackwell approachability from game theory, we introduce a forecasting framework that guarantees calibrated uncertainties for outcomes in any compact space (e.g., classification or bounded regression). We extend this framework to recalibrate existing forecasters, guaranteeing calibration without sacrificing predictive performance. We implement both general-purpose gradient-based algorithms and algorithms optimized for popular special cases of our framework. Empirically, our algorithms improve calibration and downstream decision-making for energy systems.

PDF Details

UAI Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Calibrated Regression Against An Adversary Without Regret

Shachi Deshpande
Charles Marx
Volodymyr Kuleshov

We are interested in probabilistic prediction in online settings in which data does not follow a probability distribution. Our work seeks to achieve two goals: (1) producing valid probabilities that accurately reflect model confidence; (2) ensuring that traditional notions of performance (e. g. , high accuracy) still hold. We introduce online algorithms guaranteed to achieve these goals on arbitrary streams of data-points, including data chosen by an adversary. Specifically, our algorithms produce forecasts that are (1) calibrated i. e. , an 80% confidence interval contains the true outcome 80% of the time-and (2) have low regret relative to a user-specified baseline model. We implement a post-hoc recalibration strategy that provably achieves these goals in regression; previous algorithms applied to classification or achieved (1) but not (2). In the context of Bayesian optimization, an online model-based decision-making task in which the data distribution shifts over time, our method yields accelerated convergence to improved optima.

Details

ICML Conference 2022 Conference Paper

Modular Conformal Calibration

Charles Marx
Shengjia Zhao
Willie Neiswanger
Stefano Ermon

Uncertainty estimates must be calibrated (i. e. , accurate) and sharp (i. e. , informative) in order to be useful. This has motivated a variety of methods for recalibration, which use held-out data to turn an uncalibrated model into a calibrated model. However, the applicability of existing methods is limited due to their assumption that the original model is also a probabilistic model. We introduce a versatile class of algorithms for recalibration in regression that we call modular conformal calibration (MCC). This framework allows one to transform any regression model into a calibrated probabilistic model. The modular design of MCC allows us to make simple adjustments to existing algorithms that enable well-behaved distribution predictions. We also provide finite-sample calibration guarantees for MCC algorithms. Our framework recovers isotonic recalibration, conformal calibration, and conformal interval prediction, implying that our theoretical results apply to those methods as well. Finally, we conduct an empirical study of MCC on 17 regression datasets. Our results show that new algorithms designed in our framework achieve near-perfect calibration and improve sharpness relative to existing methods.

Details

NeurIPS Conference 2019 Conference Paper

Disentangling Influence: Using disentangled representations to audit model predictions

Charles Marx
Richard Phillips
Sorelle Friedler
Carlos Scheidegger
Suresh Venkatasubramanian

Motivated by the need to audit complex and black box models, there has been extensive research on quantifying how data features influence model predictions. Feature influence can be direct (a direct influence on model outcomes) and indirect (model outcomes are influenced via proxy features). Feature influence can also be expressed in aggregate over the training or test data or locally with respect to a single point. Current research has typically focused on one of each of these dimensions. In this paper, we develop disentangled influence audits, a procedure to audit the indirect influence of features. Specifically, we show that disentangled representations provide a mechanism to identify proxy features in the dataset, while allowing an explicit computation of feature influence on either individual outcomes or aggregate-level outcomes. We show through both theory and experiments that disentangled influence audits can both detect proxy features and show, for each individual or in aggregate, which of these proxy features affects the classifier being audited the most. In this respect, our method is more powerful than existing methods for ascertaining feature influence.

PDF Details