EAAI Journal 2026 Journal Article
Behavioral three-way decision based multi-attribute decision-making for credible hesitant fuzzy information systems
- Tingquan Deng
- Chaoyue Wang
- Wenjie Wang
- Jianming Zhan
Multi-attribute decision-making, as a core of decision analysis, plays important roles in knowledge discovery for artificial intelligence, and finds extensive applications in medical assessments and assisted diagnosis. Assessment information systems are fundamental models of describing properties of objects or patients, which are composed of evaluation values of objects regarding multiple attributes, captured from such as biochemical tests, physical and instrument examinations, and statistic inferences. Due to existence of uncertainty and imprecision in collected these data at different time or from different hospitals, hesitant fuzzy sets are an effective tool of quantizing the evaluation values. In view of experiences, techniques or instrument sensitivity, the quantitative hesitant membership values may be not completely credible. The derived information systems are referred to as credible hesitant fuzzy information systems. To tackle the challenge of multi-attribute decision-making in the scenarios of credible hesitant fuzzy information systems, a behavioral three-way decision model is proposed. Firstly, the notions of dominance degree between credible hesitant fuzzy elements and dominance relation between objects are introduced in credible hesitant fuzzy information systems. With these notions, the weights of attributes are quantitatively assigned to discriminate impact of attributes on decision-making. Secondly, the regret and rejoice functions in regret theory are improved to reflect human psychological emotions for decision-making. A set of payoff functions are then constructed and decision rules are subsequently extracted by introducing the behavior three-way decision model. Finally, three medical assessment cases are comparatively analyzed using representative decision-making methods. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method reduces the error rate by at least 50% and promotes the F 1 score by 1. 4% in comparison to the best results among representative decision-making methods on the benchmark baseline cases.