Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Bonnie Webber

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

3 papers
1 author row

Possible papers

3

AAAI Conference 2021 Conference Paper

Have We Solved The Hard Problem? It’s Not Easy! Contextual Lexical Contrast as a Means to Probe Neural Coherence

  • Wenqiang Lei
  • Yisong Miao
  • Runpeng Xie
  • Bonnie Webber
  • Meichun Liu
  • Tat-Seng Chua
  • Nancy F. Chen

Lexical cohesion is a fundamental mechanism for text which requires a pair of words to be interpreted as a certain type of lexical relation (e. g. , similarity) to understand a coherent context; we refer to such relations as the contextual lexical relation. However, work on lexical cohesion has not modeled context comprehensively in considering lexical relations due to the lack of linguistic resources. In this paper, we take initial steps to address contextual lexical relations by focusing on the contrast relation, as it is a well-known relation though it is more subtle and relatively less resourced. We present a corpus named Cont2 Lex to make Contextual Lexical Contrast Recognition a computationally feasible task. We benchmark this task with widely-adopted semantic representations; we discover that contextual embeddings (e. g. BERT) generally outperform static embeddings (e. g. Glove), but barely go beyond 70% in accuracy performance. In addition, we find that all embeddings perform better when CLC occurs within the same sentence, suggesting possible limitations of current computational coherence models. Another intriguing discovery is the improvement of BERT in CLC is largely attributed to its modeling of CLC word pairs co-occurring with other word repetitions. Such observations imply that the progress made in lexical coherence modeling remains relatively primitive even for semantic representations such as BERT that have been empowering numerous standard NLP tasks to approach human benchmarks. Through presenting our corpus and benchmark, we attempt to seed initial discussions and endeavors in advancing semantic representations from modeling syntactic and semantic levels to coherence and discourse levels1.

AIJ Journal 1998 Journal Article

Exploiting multiple goals and intentions in decision support for the management of multiple trauma: a review of the TraumAID project

  • Bonnie Webber
  • Sandra Carberry
  • John R. Clarke
  • Abigail Gertner
  • Terrence Harvey
  • Ron Rymon
  • Richard Washington

Managing a patient with multiple injuries is a cognitively intense task. While protocols provide invaluable support for maintaining quality care, they generally address a single condition, while multiple trauma generally involves many. The TraumAID system tries to address this by providing tools for reasoning, planning, plan recognition and text generation which essentially coordinate and integrate multiple recommendations from multiple protocols. This paper reviews work on all these tools, including their (individual) evaluations, setting the work within a uniform conceptual framework of goals, intentions and actions. Because TraumAID's use in real-time decision support depends critically on electronic forms of information sharing and recording practices in the Emergency Trauma Center, TraumAID continues to remain a laboratory exercise. Nevertheless, the general value of integrating multiple protocols for decision support justifies attention to the solution methods TraumAID provides.

AIJ Journal 1995 Journal Article

Instructions, intentions and expectations

  • Bonnie Webber
  • Norman Badler
  • Barbara Di Eugenio
  • Chris Geib
  • Libby Levison
  • Michael Moore

Based on an ongoing attempt to integrate Natural Language instructions with human figure animation, we demonstrate that agents' understanding and use of instructions can complement what they can derive from the environment in which they act. We focus on two attitudes that contribute to agents' behavior—their intentions and their expectations—and shown how Natural Language instructions contribute to such attitudes in ways that complement the environment. We also show that instructions can require more than one context of interpretation and thus that agents' understanding of instructions can evolve as their activity progresses. A significant consequence is that Natural Language understanding in the context of behavior cannot simply be treated as “front end” processing, but rather must be integrated more deeply into the processes that guide an agent's behavior and respond to its perceptions.

v2026.09.13