Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Binny Mathew

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

4 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

4

ECAI Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Rationale-Guided Few-Shot Classification to Detect Abusive Language

  • Punyajoy Saha
  • Divyanshu Sheth
  • Kushal Kedia
  • Binny Mathew
  • Animesh Mukherjee 0001

Abusive language is a concerning problem in online social media. Past research on detecting abusive language covers different platforms, languages, demographies, etc. However, models trained using these datasets do not perform well in cross-domain evaluation settings. To overcome this, a common strategy is to use a few samples from the target domain to train models to get better performance in that domain (cross-domain few-shot training). However, this might cause the models to overfit the artefacts of those samples. A compelling solution could be to guide the models toward rationales, i. e. , spans of text that justify the text’s label. This method has been found to improve model performance in the in-domain setting across various NLP tasks. In this paper, we propose RGFS (Rationale-Guided Few-Shot Classification) for abusive language detection. We first build a multitask learning setup to jointly learn rationales, targets, and labels, and find a significant improvement of 6% macro F1 on the rationale detection task over training solely rationale classifiers. We introduce two rationale-integrated BERT-based architectures (the RGFS models) and evaluate our systems over five different abusive language datasets, finding that in the few-shot classification setting, RGFS-based models outperform baseline models by about 7% in macro F1 scores and perform competitively to models finetuned on other source domains. Furthermore, RGFS-based models outperform LIME/SHAP-based approaches in terms of plausibility and are close in performance in terms of faithfulness. Disclaimer: This paper contains material that many will find offensive or hateful. However, this cannot be avoided owing to the nature of the work.

IJCAI Conference 2022 Conference Paper

CounterGeDi: A Controllable Approach to Generate Polite, Detoxified and Emotional Counterspeech

  • Punyajoy Saha
  • Kanishk Singh
  • Adarsh Kumar
  • Binny Mathew
  • Animesh Mukherjee

Recently, many studies have tried to create generation models to assist counter speakers by providing counterspeech suggestions for combating the explosive proliferation of online hate. However, since these suggestions are from a vanilla generation model, they might not include the appropriate properties required to counter a particular hate speech instance. In this paper, we propose CounterGeDi - an ensemble of generative discriminators (GeDi) to guide the generation of a DialoGPT model toward more polite, detoxified, and emotionally laden counterspeech. We generate counterspeech using three datasets and observe significant improvement across different attribute scores. The politeness and detoxification scores increased by around 15% and 6% respectively, while the emotion in the counterspeech increased by at least 10% across all the datasets. We also experiment with triple-attribute control and observe significant improvement over single attribute results when combining complementing attributes, e. g. , politeness, joyfulness and detoxification. In all these experiments, the relevancy of the generated text does not deteriorate due to the application of these controls.

NeurIPS Conference 2022 Conference Paper

Multilingual Abusive Comment Detection at Scale for Indic Languages

  • Vikram Gupta
  • Sumegh Roychowdhury
  • Mithun Das
  • Somnath Banerjee
  • Punyajoy Saha
  • Binny Mathew
  • hastagiri prakash vanchinathan
  • Animesh Mukherjee

Social media platforms were conceived to act as online town squares' where people could get together, share information and communicate with each other peacefully. However, harmful content borne out of bad actors are constantly plaguing these platforms slowly converting them into mosh pits' where the bad actors take the liberty to extensively abuse various marginalised groups. Accurate and timely detection of abusive content on social media platforms is therefore very important for facilitating safe interactions between users. However, due to the small scale and sparse linguistic coverage of Indic abusive speech datasets, development of such algorithms for Indic social media users (one-sixth of global population) is severely impeded. To facilitate and encourage research in this important direction, we contribute for the first time MACD - a large-scale (150K), human-annotated, multilingual (5 languages), balanced (49\% abusive content) and diverse (70K users) abuse detection dataset of user comments, sourced from a popular social media platform - ShareChat. We also release AbuseXLMR, an abusive content detection model pretrained on large number of social media comments in 15+ Indic languages which outperforms XLM-R and MuRIL on multiple Indic datasets. Along with the annotations, we also release the mapping between comment, post and user id's to facilitate modelling the relationship between them. We share competitive monolingual, cross-lingual and few-shot baselines so that MACD can be used as a dataset benchmark for future research.

AAAI Conference 2021 Conference Paper

HateXplain: A Benchmark Dataset for Explainable Hate Speech Detection

  • Binny Mathew
  • Punyajoy Saha
  • Seid Muhie Yimam
  • Chris Biemann
  • Pawan Goyal
  • Animesh Mukherjee

Hate speech is a challenging issue plaguing the online social media. While better models for hate speech detection are continuously being developed, there is little research on the bias and interpretability aspects of hate speech. In this paper, we introduce HateXplain, the first benchmark hate speech dataset covering multiple aspects of the issue. Each post in our dataset is annotated from three different perspectives: the basic, commonly used 3-class classification (i. e. , hate, offensive or normal), the target community (i. e. , the community that has been the victim of hate speech/offensive speech in the post), and the rationales, i. e. , the portions of the post on which their labelling decision (as hate, offensive or normal) is based. We utilize existing state-of-the-art models and observe that even models that perform very well in classification do not score high on explainability metrics like model plausibility and faithfulness. We also observe that models, which utilize the human rationales for training, perform better in reducing unintended bias towards target communities. We have made our code and dataset public1 for other researchers2.