Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Bernd Bohnet

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

4 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

4

ICLR Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Improving Large Language Model Planning with Action Sequence Similarity

  • Xinran Zhao
  • Hanie Sedghi
  • Bernd Bohnet
  • Dale Schuurmans
  • Azade Nova

Planning is essential for artificial intelligence systems to look ahead and proactively determine a course of actions to reach objectives in the virtual and real world. Recent work on large language models (LLMs) sheds light on their planning capability in various tasks. However, it remains unclear what signals in the context influence the model performance. In this work, we explore how to improve the model planning capability through in-context learning (ICL), specifically, what signals can help select the exemplars. Through extensive experiments, we observe that commonly used problem similarity may result in false positives with drastically different plans, which can mislead the model. In response, we propose to sample and filter exemplars leveraging plan side action sequence similarity (AS). We propose GRASE-DC: a two-stage pipeline that first re-samples high AS exemplars and then curates the selected exemplars with dynamic clustering on AS to achieve a balance of relevance and diversity. Our experimental result confirms that GRASE-DC achieves significant performance improvement on various planning tasks (up to ~11-40 point absolute accuracy improvement with 27.3% fewer exemplars needed on average). With GRASE-DC* + VAL, where we iteratively apply GRASE-DC with a validator, we are able to even boost the performance by 18.9% more. Extensive analysis validates the consistent performance improvement of GRASE-DC with various backbone LLMs and on both classical planning and natural language planning benchmarks. GRASE-DC can further boost the planning accuracy by ~24 absolute points on harder problems using simpler problems as exemplars over a random baseline. This demonstrates its ability to generalize to out-of-distribution problems.

TMLR Journal 2024 Journal Article

Beyond Human Data: Scaling Self-Training for Problem-Solving with Language Models

  • Avi Singh
  • John D Co-Reyes
  • Rishabh Agarwal
  • Ankesh Anand
  • Piyush Patil
  • Xavier Garcia
  • Peter J Liu
  • James Harrison

Fine-tuning language models~(LMs) on human-generated data remains a prevalent practice. However, the performance of such models is often limited by the quantity and diversity of high-quality human data. In this paper, we explore whether we can go beyond human data on tasks where we have access to scalar feedback, for example, on math problems where one can verify correctness. To do so, we investigate a simple self-training method based on expectation-maximization, which we call \method, where we (1) generate samples from the model and filter them using binary feedback, (2) fine-tune the model on these samples, and (3) repeat this process a few times. Testing on advanced MATH reasoning and APPS coding benchmarks using PaLM-2 models, we find that \method{} scales favorably with model size and significantly surpasses fine-tuning only on human data. Overall, our findings suggest self-training with feedback can reduce dependence on human-generated data.

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Many-Shot In-Context Learning

  • Rishabh Agarwal
  • Avi Singh
  • Lei Zhang
  • Bernd Bohnet
  • Luis Rosias
  • Stephanie Chan
  • Biao Zhang
  • Ankesh Anand

Large language models (LLMs) excel at few-shot in-context learning (ICL) -- learning from a few examples provided in context at inference, without any weight updates. Newly expanded context windows allow us to investigate ICL with hundreds or thousands of examples – the many-shot regime. Going from few-shot to many-shot, we observe significant performance gains across a wide variety of generative and discriminative tasks. While promising, many-shot ICL can be bottlenecked by the available amount of human-generated outputs. To mitigate this limitation, we explore two new settings: (1) "Reinforced ICL" that uses model-generated chain-of-thought rationales in place of human rationales, and (2) "Unsupervised ICL" where we remove rationales from the prompt altogether, and prompts the model only with domain-specific inputs. We find that both Reinforced and Unsupervised ICL can be quite effective in the many-shot regime, particularly on complex reasoning tasks. We demonstrate that, unlike few-shot learning, many-shot learning is effective at overriding pretraining biases, can learn high-dimensional functions with numerical inputs, and performs comparably to supervised fine-tuning. Finally, we reveal the limitations of next-token prediction loss as an indicator of downstream ICL performance.

IJCAI Conference 2005 Conference Paper

Viewing Referring Expression Generation as Search

  • Bernd Bohnet
  • Robert

Almost all natural language generation (NLG) systems are faced with the problem of the generation of referring expressions (GRE): given a symbol corresponding to an intended referent, how do we work out the semantic content of a referring expression that uniquely identifies the entity in question? This is now one of the most widely explored problems in NLG: over the last 15 years, a number of algorithms have been proposed for addressing different aspects of this problem, but the different approaches taken make it very difficult to compare and contrast the algorithms provided in any meaningful way. In this paper, we show how viewing the problem of referring expression generation as a search problem allows us to recast existing algorithms in a way that makes their similarities and differences clear.

v2026.09.13