Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Benoît Larose

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

3 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

3

SODA Conference 2014 Conference Paper

Space complexity of list H -colouring: a dichotomy

  • László Egri
  • Pavol Hell
  • Benoît Larose
  • Arash Rafiey

The Dichotomy Conjecture for constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) states that every CSP is in P or is NP-complete (Feder-Vardi, 1993). It has been verified for conservative problems (also known as list homomorphism problems) by Bulatov (2003). We augment this result by showing that for digraph templates H, every conservative CSP, denoted LHOM( H ), is solvable in logspace or is hard for NL. More precisely, we introduce a digraph structure we call a circular N, and prove the following dichotomy: if H contains no circular N then LHOM( H ) admits a logspace algorithm, and otherwise LHOM( H ) is hard for NL. Our algorithm operates by reducing the lists in a complex manner based on a novel decomposition of an auxiliary digraph, combined with repeated applications of Reingold's algorithm for undirected reachability (2005). We also prove an algebraic version of this dichotomy: the digraphs without a circular N are precisely those that admit a finite chain of conservative polymorphisms satisfying the Hagemann-Mitschke identities. This confirms a conjecture of Larose and Tesson (2007) for LHOM( H ). Moreover, we show that the presence of a circular N can be decided in time polynomial in the size of H.

MFCS Conference 2006 Conference Paper

Systems of Equations over Finite Semigroups and the #CSP Dichotomy Conjecture

  • Ondrej Klíma 0001
  • Benoît Larose
  • Pascal Tesson

Abstract We study the complexity of counting the number of solutions to a system of equations over a fixed finite semigroup. We show that this problem is always either in FP or #P-complete and describe the borderline precisely. We use these results to convey some intuition about the conjectured dichotomy for the complexity of counting the number of solutions in constraint satisfaction problems.