Barbara Plank

AAAI Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Mind the Uncertainty in Human Disagreement: Evaluating Discrepancies Between Model Predictions and Human Responses in VQA

• Jian Lan
• Diego Frassinelli
• Barbara Plank

Large vision-language models struggle to accurately predict responses provided by multiple human annotators, particularly when those responses exhibit high uncertainty. In this study, we focus on a Visual Question Answering (VQA) task and comprehensively evaluate how well the output of the state-of-the-art vision-language model correlates with the distribution of human responses. To do so, we categorize our samples based on their levels (low, medium, high) of human uncertainty in disagreement (HUD) and employ, not only accuracy, but also three new human-correlated metrics for the first time in VQA, to investigate the impact of HUD. We also verify the effect of common calibration and human calibration (Baan et al. 2022) on the alignment of models and humans. Our results show that even BEiT3, currently the best model for this task, struggles to capture the multi-label distribution inherent in diverse human responses. Additionally, we observe that the commonly used accuracy-oriented calibration technique adversely affects BEiT3’s ability to capture HUD, further widening the gap between model predictions and human distributions. In contrast, we show the benefits of calibrating models towards human distributions for VQA, to better align model confidence with human uncertainty. Our findings highlight that for VQA, the alignment between human responses and model predictions is understudied and is an important target for future studies.

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Refusal Direction is Universal Across Safety-Aligned Languages

• Xinpeng Wang
• Mingyang Wang
• Yihong Liu
• Hinrich Schuetze
• Barbara Plank

Refusal mechanisms in large language models (LLMs) are essential for ensuring safety. Recent research has revealed that refusal behavior can be mediated by a single direction in activation space, enabling targeted interventions to bypass refusals. While this is primarily demonstrated in an English-centric context, appropriate refusal behavior is important for any language, but poorly understood. In this paper, we investigate the refusal behavior in LLMs across 14 languages using \textit{PolyRefuse}, a multilingual safety dataset created by translating malicious and benign English prompts into these languages. We uncover the surprising cross-lingual universality of the refusal direction: a vector extracted from English can bypass refusals in other languages with near-perfect effectiveness, without any additional fine-tuning. Even more remarkably, refusal directions derived from any safety-aligned language transfer seamlessly to others. We attribute this transferability to the parallelism of refusal vectors across languages in the embedding space and identify the underlying mechanism behind cross-lingual jailbreaks. These findings provide actionable insights for building more robust multilingual safety defenses and pave the way for a deeper mechanistic understanding of cross-lingual vulnerabilities in LLMs.

ICLR Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Surgical, Cheap, and Flexible: Mitigating False Refusal in Language Models via Single Vector Ablation

• Xinpeng Wang 0003
• Chengzhi Hu
• Paul Röttger
• Barbara Plank

Training a language model to be both helpful and harmless requires careful calibration of refusal behaviours: Models should refuse to follow malicious instructions or give harmful advice (e.g."how do I kill someone?"), but they should not refuse safe requests, even if they superficially resemble unsafe ones (e.g. "how do I kill a Python process?"). Avoiding such false refusal, as prior work has shown, is challenging even for highly-capable language models. In this paper, we propose a simple and surgical method for mitigating false refusal in language models via single vector ablation. For a given model, we extract a false refusal vector and show that ablating this vector reduces false refusal rate while preserving the model's safety and general capabilities. We also show that our approach can be used for fine-grained calibration of model safety. Our approach is training-free and model-agnostic, making it useful for mitigating the problem of false refusal in current and future language models.

ICML Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Position: Insights from Survey Methodology can Improve Training Data

• Stephanie Eckman
• Barbara Plank
• Frauke Kreuter

Whether future AI models are fair, trustworthy, and aligned with the public’s interests rests in part on our ability to collect accurate data about what we want the models to do. However, collecting high-quality data is difficult, and few AI/ML researchers are trained in data collection methods. Recent research in data-centric AI has show that higher quality training data leads to better performing models, making this the right moment to introduce AI/ML researchers to the field of survey methodology, the science of data collection. We summarize insights from the survey methodology literature and discuss how they can improve the quality of training and feedback data. We also suggest collaborative research ideas into how biases in data collection can be mitigated, making models more accurate and human-centric.

JAIR Journal 2022 Journal Article

Neural Natural Language Generation: A Survey on Multilinguality, Multimodality, Controllability and Learning

• Erkut Erdem
• Menekse Kuyu
• Semih Yagcioglu
• Anette Frank
• Letitia Parcalabescu
• Barbara Plank
• Andrii Babii
• Oleksii Turuta

Developing artificial learning systems that can understand and generate natural language has been one of the long-standing goals of artificial intelligence. Recent decades have witnessed an impressive progress on both of these problems, giving rise to a new family of approaches. Especially, the advances in deep learning over the past couple of years have led to neural approaches to natural language generation (NLG). These methods combine generative language learning techniques with neural-networks based frameworks. With a wide range of applications in natural language processing, neural NLG (NNLG) is a new and fast growing field of research. In this state-of-the-art report, we investigate the recent developments and applications of NNLG in its full extent from a multidimensional view, covering critical perspectives such as multimodality, multilinguality, controllability and learning strategies. We summarize the fundamental building blocks of NNLG approaches from these aspects and provide detailed reviews of commonly used preprocessing steps and basic neural architectures. This report also focuses on the seminal applications of these NNLG models such as machine translation, description generation, automatic speech recognition, abstractive summarization, text simplification, question answering and generation, and dialogue generation. Finally, we conclude with a thorough discussion of the described frameworks by pointing out some open research directions.

JAIR Journal 2021 Journal Article

Learning from Disagreement: A Survey

• Alexandra N. Uma
• Tommaso Fornaciari
• Dirk Hovy
• Silviu Paun
• Barbara Plank
• Massimo Poesio

Many tasks in Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Computer Vision (CV) offer evidence that humans disagree, from objective tasks such as part-of-speech tagging to more subjective tasks such as classifying an image or deciding whether a proposition follows from certain premises. While most learning in artificial intelligence (AI) still relies on the assumption that a single (gold) interpretation exists for each item, a growing body of research aims to develop learning methods that do not rely on this assumption. In this survey, we review the evidence for disagreements on NLP and CV tasks, focusing on tasks for which substantial datasets containing this information have been created. We discuss the most popular approaches to training models from datasets containing multiple judgments potentially in disagreement. We systematically compare these different approaches by training them with each of the available datasets, considering several ways to evaluate the resulting models. Finally, we discuss the results in depth, focusing on four key research questions, and assess how the type of evaluation and the characteristics of a dataset determine the answers to these questions. Our results suggest, first of all, that even if we abandon the assumption of a gold standard, it is still essential to reach a consensus on how to evaluate models. This is because the relative performance of the various training methods is critically affected by the chosen form of evaluation. Secondly, we observed a strong dataset effect. With substantial datasets, providing many judgments by high-quality coders for each item, training directly with soft labels achieved better results than training from aggregated or even gold labels. This result holds for both hard and soft evaluation. But when the above conditions do not hold, leveraging both gold and soft labels generally achieved the best results in the hard evaluation. All datasets and models employed in this paper are freely available as supplementary materials.

IJCAI Conference 2017 Conference Paper

Automatic Description Generation from Images: A Survey of Models, Datasets, and Evaluation Measures (Extended Abstract)

• Raffaella Bernardi
• Ruket Cakici
• Desmond Elliott
• Aykut Erdem
• Erkut Erdem
• Nazli Ikizler-Cinbis
• Frank Keller
• Adrian Muscat

Automatic image description generation is a challenging problem that has recently received a large amount of interest from the computer vision and natural language processing communities. In this survey, we classify the known approaches based on how they conceptualise this problem and provide a review of existing models, highlighting their advantages and disadvantages. Moreover, we give an overview of the benchmark image-text datasets and the evaluation measures that have been developed to assess the quality of machine-generated descriptions. Finally we explore future directions in the area of automatic image description.

JAIR Journal 2016 Journal Article

Automatic Description Generation from Images: A Survey of Models, Datasets, and Evaluation Measures

• Raffaella Bernardi
• Ruket Cakici
• Desmond Elliott
• Aykut Erdem
• Erkut Erdem
• Nazli Ikizler-Cinbis
• Frank Keller
• Adrian Muscat

Automatic description generation from natural images is a challenging problem that has recently received a large amount of interest from the computer vision and natural language processing communities. In this survey, we classify the existing approaches based on how they conceptualize this problem, viz., models that cast description as either generation problem or as a retrieval problem over a visual or multimodal representational space. We provide a detailed review of existing models, highlighting their advantages and disadvantages. Moreover, we give an overview of the benchmark image datasets and the evaluation measures that have been developed to assess the quality of machine-generated image descriptions. Finally we extrapolate future directions in the area of automatic image description generation.

AAAI Conference 2015 Conference Paper

Using Frame Semantics for Knowledge Extraction from Twitter

• Anders Søgaard
• Barbara Plank
• Hector Alonso