Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Arash Ahmadian

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

5 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

5

ICML Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Calibrated Value-Aware Model Learning with Probabilistic Environment Models

  • Claas Voelcker
  • Anastasiia Pedan
  • Arash Ahmadian
  • Romina Abachi
  • Igor Gilitschenski
  • Amir Massoud Farahmand

The idea of value-aware model learning, that models should produce accurate value estimates, has gained prominence in model-based reinforcement learning. The MuZero loss, which penalizes a model’s value function prediction compared to the ground-truth value function, has been utilized in several prominent empirical works in the literature. However, theoretical investigation into its strengths and weaknesses is limited. In this paper, we analyze the family of value-aware model learning losses, which includes the popular MuZero loss. We show that these losses, as normally used, are uncalibrated surrogate losses, which means that they do not always recover the correct model and value function. Building on this insight, we propose corrections to solve this issue. Furthermore, we investigate the interplay between the loss calibration, latent model architectures, and auxiliary losses that are commonly employed when training MuZero-style agents. We show that while deterministic models can be sufficient to predict accurate values, learning calibrated stochastic models is still advantageous.

ICLR Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Self-Improving Robust Preference Optimization

  • Eugene Choi
  • Arash Ahmadian
  • Matthieu Geist
  • Olivier Pietquin
  • Mohammad Gheshlaghi Azar

Online and offline $\mathtt{RLHF}$ methods, such as $\mathtt{PPO}$ and $\mathtt{DPO}$, have been highly successful in aligning AI with human preferences. Despite their success, however, these methods suffer from fundamental limitations: $\mathbf{(a)}$ Models trained with $\mathtt{RLHF}$ can learn from mistakes or negative examples through RL mechanism or contrastive loss during training. However, at inference time, they lack an innate self-improvement mechanism for error corrections. $\mathbf{(b)}$ The optimal solution of existing methods is highly task-dependent, making it difficult for them to generalize to new tasks. To address these challenges, we propose Self-Improving Robust Preference Optimization ($\mathtt{SRPO}$), a practical and mathematically principled offline $\mathtt{RLHF}$ framework. The key idea behind $\mathtt{SRPO}$ is to cast the problem of learning from human preferences as a self-improvement process, mathematically formulated as a min-max objective that jointly optimizes a self-improvement policy and a generative policy in an adversarial fashion. Crucially, the solution for this optimization problem is independent of the training task, which makes it robust to its changes. We then show that this objective can be reformulated as a non-adversarial offline loss, which can be efficiently optimized using standard supervised learning techniques at scale. To demonstrate $\mathtt{SRPO}$’s effectiveness, we evaluate it using AI Win-Rate (WR) against human (GOLD) completions. When tested on the XSum dataset, $\mathtt{SRPO}$ outperforms $\mathtt{DPO}$ by a margin of $\mathbf{15}$% after $5$ self-revisions, achieving an impressive $\mathbf{90}$% WR. Moreover, on the challenging Arena-Hard prompts, $\mathtt{SRPO}$ outperforms both $\mathtt{DPO}$ and $\mathtt{IPO}$ (by $\mathbf{4}$% without revision and $\mathbf{6}$% after a single revision), reaching a $\mathbf{56}$% WR against against $\mathtt{Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct}$.

ICLR Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Pushing Mixture of Experts to the Limit: Extremely Parameter Efficient MoE for Instruction Tuning

  • Ted Zadouri
  • Ahmet Üstün
  • Arash Ahmadian
  • Beyza Ermis
  • Acyr Locatelli
  • Sara Hooker

The Mixture of Experts (MoE) is a widely known neural architecture where an ensemble of specialized sub-models optimizes overall performance with a constant computational cost. However, conventional MoEs pose challenges at scale due to the need to store all experts in memory. In this paper, we push MoE to the limit. We propose extremely parameter-efficient MoE by uniquely combining MoE architecture with lightweight experts.Our MoE architecture outperforms standard parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods and is on par with full fine-tuning by only updating the lightweight experts -- less than 1\% of an 11B parameters model. Furthermore, our method generalizes to unseen tasks as it does not depend on any prior task knowledge. Our research underscores the versatility of the mixture of experts architecture, showcasing its ability to deliver robust performance even when subjected to rigorous parameter constraints.

EWRL Workshop 2024 Workshop Paper

Robust Chain of Thoughts Preference Optimization

  • Eugene Choi
  • Arash Ahmadian
  • Olivier Pietquin
  • Matthieu Geist
  • Mohammad Gheshlaghi Azar

Learning from human preferences has become the dominant paradigm in RL fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs). In particular human preferences are often distilled in the form of a reward model. Then this reward model is used through online RL methods to fine-tune the LLM. Alternatively offline methods like direct preference optimization (DPO) and Identity Preference Optimization (IPO) use contrastive losses to optimize the LLM directly by increasing the gap between the log-likelihoods of preferred and dis-preferred completions. Despite their success, these methods all suffer from a fundamental problem that their optimal solution highly depends on (and heavily optimized for) the behavior policy that has generated the completions of the preferences dataset. Therefore the solution of the existing methods may be prone to out-of-distribution (OOD) tasks where the validation dataset is significantly different from the behavior policy. Here we address this challenge by proposing Robust Chain of Thoughts Optimization (RoCoTO) of preferences, a practical and mathematically principled offline framework for reinforcement learning from human feedback that is completely robust to the changes in the behavior model. The key idea of \rocoto is to cast the problem of learning from human preferences as a self-improving chain of thoughts (CoT) process in which the goal is to learn a policy that is nearly perfect in the sense that its generations can be only minimally improved through the best self-improving CoT model. We show that this idea can be mathematically expressed in terms of a min-max optimization objective that aims at joint optimization of chain-of-thoughts policy and the main generative policy in an adversarial fashion. The solution for this joint optimization problem is independent of the behavior policy and thus it is robust to the changes in the behavior model. We then show that this objective can be re-expressed in the form of a non-adversarial IPO (DPO)-style (offline) loss which can be optimized using standard supervised optimization techniques at scale without any need for reward model and online inference. We show the effectiveness of RoCoTO in solving TL; DR summarization task and show its superiority to the baseline IPO and DPO when evaluated on OOD XSUM.

NeurIPS Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Intriguing Properties of Quantization at Scale

  • Arash Ahmadian
  • Saurabh Dash
  • Hongyu Chen
  • Bharat Venkitesh
  • Zhen Stephen Gou
  • Phil Blunsom
  • Ahmet Üstün
  • Sara Hooker

Emergent properties have been widely adopted as a term to describe behavior not present in smaller models but observed in larger models (Wei et al. , 2022a). Recent work suggests that the trade-off incurred by quantization is also an emergent property, with sharp drops in performance in models over 6B parameters. In this work, we ask are quantization cliffs in performance solely a factor of scale? Against a backdrop of increased research focus on why certain emergent properties surface at scale, this work provides a useful counter-example. We posit that it is possible to optimize for a quantization friendly training recipe that suppresses large activation magnitude outliers. Here, we find that outlier dimensions are not an inherent product of scale, but rather sensitive to the optimization conditions present during pre-training. This both opens up directions for more efficient quantization, and poses the question of whether other emergent properties are inherent or can be altered and conditioned by optimization and architecture design choices. We successfully quantize models ranging in size from 410M to 52B with minimal degradation in performance.

v2026.09.13