Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Andreas Maggiori

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

7 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

7

ICML Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Dynamic Correlation Clustering in Sublinear Update Time

  • Vincent Cohen-Addad
  • Silvio Lattanzi
  • Andreas Maggiori
  • Nikos Parotsidis

We study the classic problem of correlation clustering in dynamic vertex streams. In this setting, vertices are either added or randomly deleted over time, and each vertex pair is connected by a positive or negative edge. The objective is to continuously find a partition which minimizes the sum of positive edges crossing clusters and negative edges within clusters. We present an algorithm that maintains an $O(1)$-approximation with $O(\text{polylog} n)$ amortized update time. Prior to our work Behnezhad et al. in SODA 2023 achieved a $5$-approximation with $O(1)$ expected update time in edge streams which translates in vertex streams to an $O(D)$-update time where $D$ is the maximum possible degree. Finally we complement our theoretical analysis with experiments on real world data.

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Fair Secretaries with Unfair Predictions

  • Eric Balkanski
  • Will Ma
  • Andreas Maggiori

Algorithms with predictions is a recent framework for decision-making under uncertainty that leverages the power of machine-learned predictions without making any assumption about their quality. The goal in this framework is for algorithms to achieve an improved performance when the predictions are accurate while maintaining acceptable guarantees when the predictions are erroneous. A serious concern with algorithms that use predictions is that these predictions can be biased and, as a result, cause the algorithm to make decisions that are deemed unfair. We show that this concern manifests itself in the classical secretary problem in the learning-augmented setting---the state-of-the-art algorithm can have zero probability of accepting the best candidate, which we deem unfair, despite promising to accept a candidate whose expected value is at least $\max\{\Omega (1), 1 - O(\varepsilon)\}$ times the optimal value, where $\varepsilon$ is the prediction error. We show how to preserve this promise while also guaranteeing to accept the best candidate with probability $\Omega(1)$. Our algorithm and analysis are based on a new ``pegging'' idea that diverges from existing works and simplifies/unifies some of their results. Finally, we extend to the $k$-secretary problem and complement our theoretical analysis with experiments.

ICML Conference 2022 Conference Paper

Online and Consistent Correlation Clustering

  • Vincent Cohen-Addad
  • Silvio Lattanzi
  • Andreas Maggiori
  • Nikos Parotsidis

In the correlation clustering problem the input is a signed graph where the sign indicates whether each pair of points should be placed in the same cluster or not. The goal of the problem is to compute a clustering which minimizes the number of disagreements with such recommendation. Thanks to its many practical applications, correlation clustering is a fundamental unsupervised learning problem and has been extensively studied in many different settings. In this paper we study the problem in the classic online setting with recourse; The vertices of the graphs arrive in an online manner and the goal is to maintain an approximate clustering while minimizing the number of times each vertex changes cluster. Our main contribution is an algorithm that achieves logarithmic recourse per vertex in the worst case. We also complement this result with a tight lower bound. Finally we show experimentally that our algorithm achieves better performances than state-of-the-art algorithms on real world data.

NeurIPS Conference 2020 Conference Paper

Learning Augmented Energy Minimization via Speed Scaling

  • Etienne Bamas
  • Andreas Maggiori
  • Lars Rohwedder
  • Ola Svensson

As power management has become a primary concern in modern data centers, computing resources are being scaled dynamically to minimize energy consumption. We initiate the study of a variant of the classic online speed scaling problem, in which machine learning predictions about the future can be integrated naturally. Inspired by recent work on learning-augmented online algorithms, we propose an algorithm which incorporates predictions in a black-box manner and outperforms any online algorithm if the accuracy is high, yet maintains provable guarantees if the prediction is very inaccurate. We provide both theoretical and experimental evidence to support our claims.

NeurIPS Conference 2020 Conference Paper

The Primal-Dual method for Learning Augmented Algorithms

  • Etienne Bamas
  • Andreas Maggiori
  • Ola Svensson

The extension of classical online algorithms when provided with predictions is a new and active research area. In this paper, we extend the primal-dual method for online algorithms in order to incorporate predictions that advise the online algorithm about the next action to take. We use this framework to obtain novel algorithms for a variety of online covering problems. We compare our algorithms to the cost of the true and predicted offline optimal solutions and show that these algorithms outperform any online algorithm when the prediction is accurate while maintaining good guarantees when the prediction is misleading.

FOCS Conference 2019 Conference Paper

Online Matching with General Arrivals

  • Buddhima Gamlath
  • Michael Kapralov
  • Andreas Maggiori
  • Ola Svensson
  • David Wajc

The online matching problem was introduced by Karp, Vazirani and Vazirani nearly three decades ago. In that seminal work, they studied this problem in bipartite graphs with vertices arriving only on one side, and presented optimal deterministic and randomized algorithms for this setting. In comparison, more general arrival models, such as edge arrivals and general vertex arrivals, have proven more challenging and positive results are known only for various relaxations of the problem. In particular, even the basic question of whether randomization allows one to beat the trivially-optimal deterministic competitive ratio of 1/2 for either of these models was open. In this paper, we resolve this question for both these natural arrival models, and show the following. 1) For edge arrivals, randomization does not help - no randomized algorithm is better than 1/2 competitive. 2)For general vertex arrivals, randomization helps - there exists a randomized (1/2+Ω(1)) -competitive online matching algorithm.

v2026.09.13