Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Alessio Ragno

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

3 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

3

AAAI Conference 2026 Conference Paper

CIP-Net: Continual Interpretable Prototype-based Network

  • Federico Di Valerio
  • Michela Proietti
  • Alessio Ragno
  • Roberto Capobianco

Continual learning constrains models to learn new tasks over time without forgetting what they have already learned. A key challenge in this setting is catastrophic forgetting, where learning new information causes the model to lose its performance on previous tasks. Recently, explainable AI has been proposed as a promising way to better understand and reduce forgetting. In particular, self-explainable models are useful because they generate explanations during prediction, which can help preserve knowledge. However, most existing explainable approaches use post-hoc explanations or require additional memory for each new task, resulting in limited scalability. In this work, we introduce CIP-Net, an exemplar-free self-explainable prototype-based model designed for continual learning. CIP-Net avoids storing past examples and maintains a simple architecture, while still providing useful explanations and strong performance. We demonstrate that CIP-Net achieves state-of-the-art performances compared to previous exemplar-free and self-explainable methods in both task- and class-incremental settings, while bearing significantly lower memory-related overhead. This makes it a practical and interpretable solution for continual learning.

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

On Logic-based Self-Explainable Graph Neural Networks

  • Alessio Ragno
  • Marc Plantevit
  • Céline Robardet

Graphs are complex, non-Euclidean structures that require specialized models, such as Graph Neural Networks (GNNs), Graph Transformers, or kernel-based approaches, to effectively capture their relational patterns. This inherent complexity makes explaining GNNs decisions particularly challenging. Most existing explainable AI (XAI) methods for GNNs focus on identifying influential nodes or extracting subgraphs that highlight relevant motifs. However, these approaches often fall short of clarifying how such elements contribute to the final prediction. To overcome this limitation, logic-based explanations aim to derive explicit logical rules that reflect the model's decision-making process. Current logic-based methods are limited to post-hoc analyzes and are predominantly applied to graph classification, leaving a significant gap in intrinsically explainable GNN architectures. In this paper, we explore the potential of integrating logic reasoning directly into graph learning. We introduce LogiX-GIN, a novel, self-explainable GNN architecture that incorporates logic layers to produce interpretable logical rules as part of the learning process. Unlike post-hoc methods, LogiX-GIN provides faithful, transparent, and inherently interpretable explanations aligned with the model's internal computations. We evaluate LogiX-GIN across several graph-based tasks and show that it achieves competitive predictive performance while delivering clear, logic-based insights into its decision-making process.

ECAI Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Transparent Explainable Logic Layers

  • Alessio Ragno
  • Marc Plantevit
  • Céline Robardet
  • Roberto Capobianco

Explainable AI seeks to unveil the intricacies of black box models through post-hoc strategies or self-interpretable models. In this paper, we tackle the problem of building layers that are intrinsically explainable through logic rules. In particular, we address current state-of-the-art methods’ lack of fidelity and expressivity by introducing a transparent explainable logic layer (TELL). We propose to constrain a feed-forward layer with positive weights, which, combined with particular activation functions, offer the possibility of a direct translation into logic rules. Additionally, this approach overcomes the limitations of previous models, linked to their applicability to binary data only, by proposing a new way to automatically threshold real values and incorporate the obtained predicates into logic rules. We show that, compared to state-of-the-art, TELL achieves similar classification performances and, at the same time, provides higher explanatory power, measured by the agreement between models’ outputs and the activation of the logic explanations. In addition, TELL offers a broader spectrum of applications thanks to the possibility of its use on real data.

v2026.09.13