Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Alan J. Carson

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

2 papers
1 author row

Possible papers

2

YNICL Journal 2024 Journal Article

Response to the Letter Concerning the Publication: Neuroimaging in Functional Neurological Disorder: State of the Field and Research Agenda. Perez DL et al. Neuroimage Clin. 2021;30:102623

  • David L. Perez
  • Timothy R. Nicholson
  • Ali A. Asadi-Pooya
  • Matthew Butler
  • Alan J. Carson
  • Anthony S. David
  • Quinton Deeley
  • Ibai Diez

In their letter, Tuller and colleagues raise concerns regarding the following introductory phrase and the linked Stone et al (2010) reference: "this renewed interest parallels recognition that FND [functional neurological disorder] is the 2nd most common outpatient neurologic diagnosis."While we appreciate there is complexity to epidemiological considerations in FND, we do not agree with the concerns raised.We share our perspective on this matter with the following four points:

YNICL Journal 2021 Journal Article

Neuroimaging in Functional Neurological Disorder: State of the Field and Research Agenda

  • David L. Perez
  • Timothy R. Nicholson
  • Ali A. Asadi-Pooya
  • Indrit Bègue
  • Matthew Butler
  • Alan J. Carson
  • Anthony S. David
  • Quinton Deeley

Functional neurological disorder (FND) was of great interest to early clinical neuroscience leaders. During the 20th century, neurology and psychiatry grew apart - leaving FND a borderland condition. Fortunately, a renaissance has occurred in the last two decades, fostered by increased recognition that FND is prevalent and diagnosed using "rule-in" examination signs. The parallel use of scientific tools to bridge brain structure - function relationships has helped refine an integrated biopsychosocial framework through which to conceptualize FND. In particular, a growing number of quality neuroimaging studies using a variety of methodologies have shed light on the emerging pathophysiology of FND. This renewed scientific interest has occurred in parallel with enhanced interdisciplinary collaborations, as illustrated by new care models combining psychological and physical therapies and the creation of a new multidisciplinary FND society supporting knowledge dissemination in the field. Within this context, this article summarizes the output of the first International FND Neuroimaging Workgroup meeting, held virtually, on June 17th, 2020 to appraise the state of neuroimaging research in the field and to catalyze large-scale collaborations. We first briefly summarize neural circuit models of FND, and then detail the research approaches used to date in FND within core content areas: cohort characterization; control group considerations; task-based functional neuroimaging; resting-state networks; structural neuroimaging; biomarkers of symptom severity and risk of illness; and predictors of treatment response and prognosis. Lastly, we outline a neuroimaging-focused research agenda to elucidate the pathophysiology of FND and aid the development of novel biologically and psychologically-informed treatments.