Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Alan Edelman

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

2 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

2

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Physics-Constrained Flow Matching: Sampling Generative Models with Hard Constraints

  • Utkarsh Utkarsh
  • Pengfei Cai
  • Alan Edelman
  • Rafael Gomez-Bombarelli
  • Christopher Rackauckas

Deep generative models have recently been applied to physical systems governed by partial differential equations (PDEs), offering scalable simulation and uncertainty-aware inference. However, enforcing physical constraints, such as conservation laws (linear and nonlinear) and physical consistencies, remains challenging. Existing methods often rely on soft penalties or architectural biases that fail to guarantee hard constraints. In this work, we propose Physics-Constrained Flow Matching (PCFM), a zero-shot inference framework that enforces arbitrary nonlinear constraints in pretrained flow-based generative models. PCFM continuously guides the sampling process through physics-based corrections applied to intermediate solution states, while remaining aligned with the learned flow and satisfying physical constraints. Empirically, PCFM outperforms both unconstrained and constrained baselines on a range of PDEs, including those with shocks, discontinuities, and sharp features, while ensuring exact constraint satisfaction at the final solution. Our method provides a flexible framework for enforcing hard constraints in both scientific and general-purpose generative models, especially in applications where constraint satisfaction is essential.

ICML Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Locally Regularized Neural Differential Equations: Some Black Boxes were meant to remain closed!

  • Avik Pal
  • Alan Edelman
  • Christopher Vincent Rackauckas

Neural Differential Equations have become an important modeling framework due to their ability to adapt to new problems automatically. Training a neural differential equation is effectively a search over a space of plausible dynamical systems. Controlling the computational cost for these models is difficult since it relies on the number of steps the adaptive solver takes. Most prior works have used higher-order methods to reduce prediction timings while greatly increasing training time or reducing both training and prediction timings by relying on specific training algorithms, which are harder to use as a drop-in replacement. In this manuscript, we use internal cost heuristics of adaptive differential equation solvers at stochastic time-points to guide the training towards learning a dynamical system that is easier to integrate. We “close the blackbox” and allow the use of our method with any sensitivity method. We perform experimental studies to compare our method to global regularization to show that we attain similar performance numbers without compromising on the flexibility of implementation. We develop two sampling strategies to trade-off between performance and training time. Our method reduces the number of function evaluations to 0. 556x - 0. 733x and accelerates predictions by 1. 3x - 2x.

v2026.09.13