Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Aditya Parulekar

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

2 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

2

ICML Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Diffusion Posterior Sampling is Computationally Intractable

  • Shivam Gupta 0002
  • Ajil Jalal
  • Aditya Parulekar
  • Eric Price 0001
  • Zhiyang Xun

Diffusion models are a remarkably effective way of learning and sampling from a distribution $p(x)$. In posterior sampling, one is also given a measurement model $p(y \mid x)$ and a measurement $y$, and would like to sample from $p(x \mid y)$. Posterior sampling is useful for tasks such as inpainting, super-resolution, and MRI reconstruction, so a number of recent works have given algorithms to heuristically approximate it; but none are known to converge to the correct distribution in polynomial time. In this paper we show that posterior sampling is computationally intractable: under the most basic assumption in cryptography—that one-way functions exist—there are instances for which every algorithm takes superpolynomial time, even though unconditional sampling is provably fast. We also show that the exponential-time rejection sampling algorithm is essentially optimal under the stronger plausible assumption that there are one-way functions that take exponential time to invert.

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Improved Sample Complexity Bounds for Diffusion Model Training

  • Shivam Gupta
  • Aditya Parulekar
  • Eric Price
  • Zhiyang Xun

Diffusion models have become the most popular approach to deep generative modeling of images, largely due to their empirical performance and reliability. From a theoretical standpoint, a number of recent works [CCL+23, CCSW22, BBDD24] have studied the iteration complexity of sampling, assuming access to an accurate diffusion model. In this work, we focus on understanding the sample complexity of training such a model; how many samples are needed to learn an accurate diffusion model using a sufficiently expressive neural network? Prior work [BMR20] showed bounds polynomial in the dimension, desired Total Variation error, and Wasserstein error. We show an exponential improvement in the dependence on Wasserstein error and depth, along with improved dependencies on other relevant parameters.

v2026.09.13