Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Adam Smith

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

15 papers
2 author rows

Possible papers

15

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Auditing Privacy Mechanisms via Label Inference Attacks

  • Róbert I. Busa-Fekete
  • Travis Dick
  • Claudio Gentile
  • Andrés M. Medina
  • Adam Smith
  • Marika Swanberg

We propose reconstruction advantage measures to audit label privatization mechanisms. A reconstruction advantage measure quantifies the increase in an attacker's ability to infer the true label of an unlabeled example when provided with a private version of the labels in a dataset (e. g. , aggregate of labels from different users or noisy labels output by randomized response), compared to an attacker that only observes the feature vectors, but may have prior knowledge of the correlation between features and labels. We consider two such auditing measures: one additive, and on multiplicative. These cover previous approaches taken in the literature on empirical auditing and differential privacy. These measures allow us to place a variety of proposed privatization schemes---some differentially private, some not---on the same footing. We analyze these measures theoretically under a distributional model which, we claim, encapsulates reasonable adversarial settings. We also quantify their behavior empirically on real and simulated prediction tasks. Across a range of experimental settings, we find that differentially private schemes dominate or match the privacy-utility tradeoff of more heuristic approaches.

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Optimal Hypothesis Selection in (Almost) Linear Time

  • Maryam Aliakbarpour
  • Mark Bun
  • Adam Smith

Hypothesis selection, also known as density estimation, is a fundamental problem in statistics and learning theory. Suppose we are given a sample set from an unknown distribution $P$ and a finite class of candidate distributions (called hypotheses) $\mathcal{H} \coloneqq \{H_1, H_2, \ldots, H_n\}$. The aim is to design an algorithm that selects a distribution $\hat H$ in $\mathcal{H}$ that best fits the data. The algorithm's accuracy is measured based on the distance between $\hat{H}$ and $P$ compared to the distance of the closest distribution in $\mathcal{H}$ to $P$ (denoted by $OPT$). Concretely, we aim for $\|\hat{H} - P\|_{TV}$ to be at most $ \alpha \cdot OPT + \epsilon$ for some small $\epsilon$ and $\alpha$. While it is possible to decrease the value of $\epsilon$ as the number of samples increases, $\alpha$ is an inherent characteristic of the algorithm. In fact, one cannot hope to achieve $\alpha < 3$ even when there are only two candidate hypotheses, unless the number of samples is proportional to the domain size of $P$ [Bousquet, Kane, Moran '19]. Finding the best $\alpha$ has been one of the main focuses of studies of the problem since early work of [Devroye, Lugosi '01]. Prior to our work, no algorithm was known that achieves $\alpha = 3$ in near-linear time. We provide the first algorithm that operates in almost linear time ($\tilde{O}(n/\epsilon^3)$ time) and achieves $\alpha = 3$. This result improves upon a long list of results in hypothesis selection. Previously known algorithms either had worse time complexity, a larger factor $\alpha$, or extra assumptions about the problem setting. In addition to this algorithm, we provide another (almost) linear-time algorithm with better dependency on the additive accuracy parameter $\epsilon$, albeit with a slightly worse accuracy parameter, $\alpha = 4$.

ICRA Conference 2024 Conference Paper

RASCAL: A Scalable, High-redundancy Robot for Automated Storage and Retrieval Systems

  • Richard Black
  • Marco Caballero
  • Andromachi Chatzieleftheriou
  • Tim Deegan
  • Philip Heard
  • Freddie Hong
  • Russell Joyce
  • Sergey Legtchenko

Automated storage and retrieval systems (ASRS) are a key component of the modern storage industry, and are used in a wide range of applications, carrying anything from lightweight tape cartridges to entire pallets of goods. Many of these systems are under pressure to maximise the use of space by growing in height and density, but this can create challenges for the the robots that service them. In this context, we present RASCAL, a novel ASRS robot for small payload items in structured environments, with a focus on system-level scalability and redundancy. We describe the design objectives of RASCAL and how they address some of the limitations of existing robotic systems in this area, such as scalability and redundancy. We then demonstrate the viability of our design with a proof-of-concept implementation of a data centre storage media robot, and show through a series of experiments that its design, speed, accuracy, and energy efficiency are appropriate for this application.

NeurIPS Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Counting Distinct Elements in the Turnstile Model with Differential Privacy under Continual Observation

  • Palak Jain
  • Iden Kalemaj
  • Sofya Raskhodnikova
  • Satchit Sivakumar
  • Adam Smith

Privacy is a central challenge for systems that learn from sensitive data sets, especially when a system's outputs must be continuously updated to reflect changing data. We consider the achievable error for differentially private continual release of a basic statistic---the number of distinct items---in a stream where items may be both inserted and deleted (the turnstile model). With only insertions, existing algorithms have additive error just polylogarithmic in the length of the stream $T$. We uncover a much richer landscape in the turnstile model, even without considering memory restrictions. We show that every differentially private mechanism that handles insertions and deletions has worst-case additive error at least $T^{1/4}$ even under a relatively weak, event-level privacy definition. Then, we identify a parameter of the input stream, its maximum flippancy, that is low for natural data streams and for which we give tight parameterized error guarantees. Specifically, the maximum flippancy is the largest number of times that the contribution of a single item to the distinct elements count changes over the course of the stream. We present an item-level differentially private mechanism that, for all turnstile streams with maximum flippancy $w$, continually outputs the number of distinct elements with an $O(\sqrt{w} \cdot \mathsf{poly}\log T)$ additive error, without requiring prior knowledge of $w$. We prove that this is the best achievable error bound that depends only on $w$, for a large range of values of $w$. When $w$ is small, the error of our mechanism is similar to the polylogarithmic in $T$ error in the insertion-only setting, bypassing the hardness in the turnstile model.

NeurIPS Conference 2023 Conference Paper

Hypothesis Selection with Memory Constraints

  • Maryam Aliakbarpour
  • Mark Bun
  • Adam Smith

Hypothesis selection is a fundamental problem in learning theory and statistics. Given a dataset and a finite set of candidate distributions, the goal is to select a distribution that matches the data as well as possible. More specifically, suppose we have sample access to an unknown distribution $P$ over a domain $\mathcal{X}$ that we know is well-approximated by one of a a class of $n$ distributions (a. k. a. hypotheses), $\mathcal{H} \coloneqq \{H_1, H_2, \ldots, H_n\}$. The goal is to design an algorithm that outputs a distribution $\hat{H} \in \mathcal{H}$ whose total variation distance from $P$ is nearly minimal. In this work, we study the hypothesis selection problem under memory constraints. We consider a model where samples from $P$ are presented in a stream and we access each sample $x$ via ``PDF-comparison'' queries that allow us to compare the probability densities of any pair of hypothesesat the domain point $x$ (i. e. , is $H_i(x) < H_j(x)$? ). This model allows us to study how much memory is needed at any point in time to store information about the portion of the stream seen so far. Our main result is an algorithm that achieves a nearly optimal tradeoff between memory usage and the number of samples required. In particular, given $b$ bits of memory (for $b$ roughly between $\log n$ and $n$), our algorithm solves the hypothesis selection problem with $s$ samples, where $b \cdot s = O(n \log n)$. This result is optimal up to an $O(\log n)$ factor, for all $b$.

NeurIPS Conference 2022 Conference Paper

Improved Differential Privacy for SGD via Optimal Private Linear Operators on Adaptive Streams

  • Sergey Denisov
  • H. Brendan McMahan
  • John Rush
  • Adam Smith
  • Abhradeep Guha Thakurta

Motivated by recent applications requiring differential privacy in the setting of adaptive streams, we investigate the question of optimal instantiations of the matrix mechanism in this setting. We prove fundamental theoretical results on the applicability of matrix factorizations to the adaptive streaming setting, and provide a new parameter-free fixed-point algorithm for computing optimal factorizations. We instantiate this framework with respect to concrete matrices which arise naturally in the machine learning setting, and train user-level differentially private models with the resulting optimal mechanisms, yielding significant improvements on a notable problem in federated learning with user-level differential privacy.

NeurIPS Conference 2021 Conference Paper

Covariance-Aware Private Mean Estimation Without Private Covariance Estimation

  • Gavin Brown
  • Marco Gaboardi
  • Adam Smith
  • Jonathan Ullman
  • Lydia Zakynthinou

We present two sample-efficient differentially private mean estimators for $d$-dimensional (sub)Gaussian distributions with unknown covariance. Informally, given $n \gtrsim d/\alpha^2$ samples from such a distribution with mean $\mu$ and covariance $\Sigma$, our estimators output $\tilde\mu$ such that $\| \tilde\mu - \mu \|_{\Sigma} \leq \alpha$, where $\| \cdot \|_{\Sigma}$ is the \emph{Mahalanobis distance}. All previous estimators with the same guarantee either require strong a priori bounds on the covariance matrix or require $\Omega(d^{3/2})$ samples. Each of our estimators is based on a simple, general approach to designing differentially private mechanisms, but with novel technical steps to make the estimator private and sample-efficient. Our first estimator samples a point with approximately maximum Tukey depth using the exponential mechanism, but restricted to the set of points of large Tukey depth. Proving that this mechanism is private requires a novel analysis. Our second estimator perturbs the empirical mean of the data set with noise calibrated to the empirical covariance. Only the mean is released, however; the covariance is only used internally. Its sample complexity guarantees hold more generally for subgaussian distributions, albeit with a slightly worse dependence on the privacy parameter. For both estimators, careful preprocessing of the data is required to satisfy differential privacy.

NeurIPS Conference 2021 Conference Paper

Differentially Private Model Personalization

  • Prateek Jain
  • John Rush
  • Adam Smith
  • Shuang Song
  • Abhradeep Guha Thakurta

We study personalization of supervised learning with user-level differential privacy. Consider a setting with many users, each of whom has a training data set drawn from their own distribution $P_i$. Assuming some shared structure among the problems $P_i$, can users collectively learn the shared structure---and solve their tasks better than they could individually---while preserving the privacy of their data? We formulate this question using joint, user-level differential privacy---that is, we control what is leaked about each user's entire data set. We provide algorithms that exploit popular non-private approaches in this domain like the Almost-No-Inner-Loop (ANIL) method, and give strong user-level privacy guarantees for our general approach. When the problems $P_i$ are linear regression problems with each user's regression vector lying in a common, unknown low-dimensional subspace, we show that our efficient algorithms satisfy nearly optimal estimation error guarantees. We also establish a general, information-theoretic upper bound via an exponential mechanism-based algorithm.

NeurIPS Conference 2021 Conference Paper

Differentially Private Sampling from Distributions

  • Sofya Raskhodnikova
  • Satchit Sivakumar
  • Adam Smith
  • Marika Swanberg

We initiate an investigation of private sampling from distributions. Given a dataset with $n$ independent observations from an unknown distribution $P$, a sampling algorithm must output a single observation from a distribution that is close in total variation distance to $P$ while satisfying differential privacy. Sampling abstracts the goal of generating small amounts of realistic-looking data. We provide tight upper and lower bounds for the dataset size needed for this task for three natural families of distributions: arbitrary distributions on $\{1, \ldots, k\}$, arbitrary product distributions on $\{0, 1\}^d$, and product distributions on on $\{0, 1\}^d$ with bias in each coordinate bounded away from 0 and 1. We demonstrate that, in some parameter regimes, private sampling requires asymptotically fewer observations than learning a description of $P$ nonprivately; in other regimes, however, private sampling proves to be as difficult as private learning. Notably, for some classes of distributions, the overhead in the number of observations needed for private learning compared to non-private learning is completely captured by the number of observations needed for private sampling.

JMLR Journal 2020 Journal Article

Empirical Risk Minimization in the Non-interactive Local Model of Differential Privacy

  • Di Wang
  • Marco Gaboardi
  • Adam Smith
  • Jinhui Xu

In this paper, we study the Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) problem in the non-interactive Local Differential Privacy (LDP) model. Previous research on this problem (Smith et al., 2017) indicates that the sample complexity, to achieve error $\alpha$, needs to be exponentially depending on the dimensionality $p$ for general loss functions. In this paper, we make two attempts to resolve this issue by investigating conditions on the loss functions that allow us to remove such a limit. In our first attempt, we show that if the loss function is $(\infty, T)$-smooth, by using the Bernstein polynomial approximation we can avoid the exponential dependency in the term of $\alpha$. We then propose player-efficient algorithms with $1$-bit communication complexity and $O(1)$ computation cost for each player. The error bound of these algorithms is asymptotically the same as the original one. With some additional assumptions, we also give an algorithm which is more efficient for the server. In our second attempt, we show that for any $1$-Lipschitz generalized linear convex loss function, there is an $(\epsilon, \delta)$-LDP algorithm whose sample complexity for achieving error $\alpha$ is only linear in the dimensionality $p$. Our results use a polynomial of inner product approximation technique. Finally, motivated by the idea of using polynomial approximation and based on different types of polynomial approximations, we propose (efficient) non-interactive locally differentially private algorithms for learning the set of k-way marginal queries and the set of smooth queries. [abs] [ pdf ][ bib ] &copy JMLR 2020. ( edit, beta )

NeurIPS Conference 2020 Conference Paper

The Flajolet-Martin Sketch Itself Preserves Differential Privacy: Private Counting with Minimal Space

  • Adam Smith
  • Shuang Song
  • Abhradeep Guha Thakurta

We revisit the problem of counting the number of distinct elements $\dist$ in a data stream $D$, over a domain $[u]$. We propose an $(\epsilon, \delta)$-differentially private algorithm that approximates $\dist$ within a factor of $(1\pm\gamma)$, and with additive error of $O(\sqrt{\ln(1/\delta)}/\epsilon)$, using space $O(\ln(\ln(u)/\gamma)/\gamma^2)$. We improve on the prior work at least quadratically and up to exponentially, in terms of both space and additive error. Our additive error guarantee is optimal up to a factor of $O(\sqrt{\ln(1/\delta)})$, and the space bound is optimal up to a factor of $O\left(\min\left\{\ln\left(\frac{\ln(u)}{\gamma}\right), \frac{1}{\gamma^2}\right\}\right)$. We assume the existence of an ideal uniform random hash function, and ignore the space required to store it. We later relax this requirement by assuming pseudorandom functions and appealing to a computational variant of differential privacy, SIM-CDP. Our algorithm is built on top of the celebrated Flajolet-Martin (FM) sketch. We show that FM-sketch is differentially private as is, as long as there are $\approx \sqrt{\ln(1/\delta)}/(\epsilon\gamma)$ distinct elements in the data set. Along the way, we prove a structural result showing that the maximum of $k$ i. i. d. random variables is statistically close (in the sense of $\epsilon$-differential privacy) to the maximum of $(k+1)$ i. i. d. samples from the same distribution, as long as $k=\Omega\left(\frac{1}{\epsilon}\right)$. Finally, experiments show that our algorithms introduces error within an order of magnitude of the non-private analogues for streams with thousands of distinct elements, even while providing strong privacy guarantee ($\eps\leq 1$).

NeurIPS Conference 2018 Conference Paper

Graph Oracle Models, Lower Bounds, and Gaps for Parallel Stochastic Optimization

  • Blake Woodworth
  • Jialei Wang
  • Adam Smith
  • Brendan McMahan
  • Nati Srebro

We suggest a general oracle-based framework that captures parallel stochastic optimization in different parallelization settings described by a dependency graph, and derive generic lower bounds in terms of this graph. We then use the framework and derive lower bounds to study several specific parallel optimization settings, including delayed updates and parallel processing with intermittent communication. We highlight gaps between lower and upper bounds on the oracle complexity, and cases where the ``natural'' algorithms are not known to be optimal.

NeurIPS Conference 2018 Conference Paper

The Limits of Post-Selection Generalization

  • Jonathan Ullman
  • Adam Smith
  • Kobbi Nissim
  • Uri Stemmer
  • Thomas Steinke

While statistics and machine learning offers numerous methods for ensuring generalization, these methods often fail in the presence of post selection ---the common practice in which the choice of analysis depends on previous interactions with the same dataset. A recent line of work has introduced powerful, general purpose algorithms that ensure a property called post hoc generalization (Cummings et al. , COLT'16), which says that no person when given the output of the algorithm should be able to find any statistic for which the data differs significantly from the population it came from. In this work we show several limitations on the power of algorithms satisfying post hoc generalization. First, we show a tight lower bound on the error of any algorithm that satisfies post hoc generalization and answers adaptively chosen statistical queries, showing a strong barrier to progress in post selection data analysis. Second, we show that post hoc generalization is not closed under composition, despite many examples of such algorithms exhibiting strong composition properties.

NeurIPS Conference 2015 Conference Paper

Private Graphon Estimation for Sparse Graphs

  • Christian Borgs
  • Jennifer Chayes
  • Adam Smith

We design algorithms for fitting a high-dimensional statistical model to a large, sparse network without revealing sensitive information of individual members. Given a sparse input graph $G$, our algorithms output a node-differentially private nonparametric block model approximation. By node-differentially private, we mean that our output hides the insertion or removal of a vertex and all its adjacent edges. If $G$ is an instance of the network obtained from a generative nonparametric model defined in terms of a graphon $W$, our model guarantees consistency: as the number of vertices tends to infinity, the output of our algorithm converges to $W$ in an appropriate version of the $L_2$ norm. In particular, this means we can estimate the sizes of all multi-way cuts in $G$. Our results hold as long as $W$ is bounded, the average degree of $G$ grows at least like the log of the number of vertices, and the number of blocks goes to infinity at an appropriate rate. We give explicit error bounds in terms of the parameters of the model; in several settings, our bounds improve on or match known nonprivate results.

NeurIPS Conference 2013 Conference Paper

(Nearly) Optimal Algorithms for Private Online Learning in Full-information and Bandit Settings

  • Abhradeep Guha Thakurta
  • Adam Smith

We provide a general technique for making online learning algorithms differentially private, in both the full information and bandit settings. Our technique applies to algorithms that aim to minimize a \emph{convex} loss function which is a sum of smaller convex loss terms, one for each data point. We modify the popular \emph{mirror descent} approach, or rather a variant called \emph{follow the approximate leader}. The technique leads to the first nonprivate algorithms for private online learning in the bandit setting. In the full information setting, our algorithms improve over the regret bounds of previous work. In many cases, our algorithms (in both settings) matching the dependence on the input length, $T$, of the \emph{optimal nonprivate} regret bounds up to logarithmic factors in $T$. Our algorithms require logarithmic space and update time.

v2026.09.13