Arrow Research search

Author name cluster

Abhishek Roy

Possible papers associated with this exact author name in Arrow. This page groups case-insensitive exact name matches and is not a full identity disambiguation profile.

8 papers
1 author row

Possible papers

8

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Acceleration via silver step-size on Riemannian manifolds with applications to Wasserstein space

  • Jiyoung Park
  • Abhishek Roy
  • Jonathan W. Siegel
  • Anirban Bhattacharya

There is extensive literature on accelerating first-order optimization methods in an Euclidean setting. Under which conditions such acceleration is feasible in Riemannian optimization problems is an active area of research. Motivated by the recent success of silver stepsize methods in the Euclidean setting, we undertake a study of such algorithms in the Riemannian setting. We provide the new class of algorithms determined by the choice of vector transport that allows the silver stepsize acceleration on Riemannian manifolds for the function classes associated with the corresponding vector transport. As a core application, we show that our algorithm recovers the standard Wasserstein gradient descent on the 2-Wasserstein space and, as a result, provides the first provable accelerated gradient method for potential functional optimization problems in the Wasserstein space. In addition, we validate the numerical strength of the algorithm for standard benchmark tasks on the space of symmetric positive definite matrices.

NeurIPS Conference 2025 Conference Paper

Preference Optimization on Pareto Sets: On a Theory of Multi-Objective Optimization

  • Abhishek Roy
  • Geelon So
  • Yian Ma

In multi-objective optimization, a single decision vector must balance the trade-offs across many objectives. Pareto-optimal solutions are those achieving optimal trade-offs, where improving any objective comes at a cost to another. As many different decisions can be Pareto optimal, this raises the question of which solution to pick and how. We formulate this problem as one of optimizing a preference function over the set of Pareto-optimal solutions, or Pareto-constrained optimization for short. It poses significant challenges: not only is the constraint set defined implicitly, but it is also generally non-convex and non-smooth, even when the objectives are strongly convex. We propose an equivalent formulation of the problem where the constraint set is the simplex, leading to clearer notions of optimality and stationarity that improve upon existing definitions in literature. We give an algorithm with a last-iterate convergence rate of $O(K^{-1/2})$ to stationarity when the preference function is Lipschitz smooth and when the objective functions are strongly convex and Lipschitz smooth. Motivated by applications like Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF), we also extend this algorithm to the case where access to the preference function is only available through dueling feedback.

NeurIPS Conference 2024 Conference Paper

Stochastic Optimization Algorithms for Instrumental Variable Regression with Streaming Data

  • Xuxing Chen
  • Abhishek Roy
  • Yifan Hu
  • Krishnakumar Balasubramanian

We develop and analyze algorithms for instrumental variable regression by viewing the problem as a conditional stochastic optimization problem. In the context of least-squares instrumental variable regression, our algorithms neither require matrix inversions nor mini-batches thereby providing a fully online approach for performing instrumental variable regression with streaming data. When the true model is linear, we derive rates of convergence in expectation, that are of order $\mathcal{O}(\log T/T)$ and $\mathcal{O}(1/T^{1-\epsilon})$ for any $\epsilon>0$, respectively under the availability of two-sample and one-sample oracles respectively. Importantly, under the availability of the two-sample oracle, the aforementioned rate is actually agnostic to the relationship between confounder and the instrumental variable demonstrating the flexibility of the proposed approach in alleviating the need for explicit model assumptions required in recent works based on reformulating the problem as min-max optimization problems. Experimental validation is provided to demonstrate the advantages of the proposed algorithms over classical approaches like the 2SLS method.

NeurIPS Conference 2022 Conference Paper

Constrained Stochastic Nonconvex Optimization with State-dependent Markov Data

  • Abhishek Roy
  • Krishnakumar Balasubramanian
  • Saeed Ghadimi

We study stochastic optimization algorithms for constrained nonconvex stochastic optimization problems with Markovian data. In particular, we focus on the case when the transition kernel of the Markov chain is state-dependent. Such stochastic optimization problems arise in various machine learning problems including strategic classification and reinforcement learning. For this problem, we study both projection-based and projection-free algorithms. In both cases, we establish that the number of calls to the stochastic first-order oracle to obtain an appropriately defined $\epsilon$-stationary point is of the order $\mathcal{O}(1/\epsilon^{2. 5})$. In the projection-free setting we additionally establish that the number of calls to the linear minimization oracle is of order $\mathcal{O}(1/\epsilon^{5. 5})$. We also empirically demonstrate the performance of our algorithm on the problem of strategic classification with neural networks.

JMLR Journal 2022 Journal Article

Stochastic Zeroth-Order Optimization under Nonstationarity and Nonconvexity

  • Abhishek Roy
  • Krishnakumar Balasubramanian
  • Saeed Ghadimi
  • Prasant Mohapatra

Stochastic zeroth-order optimization algorithms have been predominantly analyzed under the assumption that the objective function being optimized is time-invariant. Motivated by dynamic matrix sensing and completion problems, and online reinforcement learning problems, in this work, we propose and analyze stochastic zeroth-order optimization algorithms when the objective being optimized changes with time. Considering general nonconvex functions, we propose nonstationary versions of regret measures based on first-order and second-order optimal solutions, and provide the corresponding regret bounds. For the case of first-order optimal solution based regret measures, we provide regret bounds in both the low- and high-dimensional settings. For the case of second-order optimal solution based regret, we propose zeroth-order versions of the stochastic cubic-regularized Newton's method based on estimating the Hessian matrices in the bandit setting via second-order Gaussian Stein's identity. Our nonstationary regret bounds in terms of second-order optimal solutions have interesting consequences for avoiding saddle points in the nonstationary setting. [abs] [ pdf ][ bib ] &copy JMLR 2022. ( edit, beta )

NeurIPS Conference 2021 Conference Paper

On Empirical Risk Minimization with Dependent and Heavy-Tailed Data

  • Abhishek Roy
  • Krishnakumar Balasubramanian
  • Murat A. Erdogdu

In this work, we establish risk bounds for Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) with both dependent and heavy-tailed data-generating processes. We do so by extending the seminal works~\cite{pmlr-v35-mendelson14, mendelson2018learning} on the analysis of ERM with heavy-tailed but independent and identically distributed observations, to the strictly stationary exponentially $\beta$-mixing case. We allow for the interaction between the noise and inputs to be even polynomially heavy-tailed, which covers a significantly large class of heavy-tailed models beyond what is analyzed in the learning theory literature. We illustrate our theoretical results by obtaining rates of convergence for high-dimensional linear regression with dependent and heavy-tailed data.

NeurIPS Conference 2020 Conference Paper

Escaping Saddle-Point Faster under Interpolation-like Conditions

  • Abhishek Roy
  • Krishnakumar Balasubramanian
  • Saeed Ghadimi
  • Prasant Mohapatra

In this paper, we show that under over-parametrization several standard stochastic optimization algorithms escape saddle-points and converge to local-minimizers much faster. One of the fundamental aspects of over-parametrized models is that they are capable of interpolating the training data. We show that, under interpolation-like assumptions satisfied by the stochastic gradients in an over-parametrization setting, the first-order oracle complexity of Perturbed Stochastic Gradient Descent (PSGD) algorithm to reach an $\epsilon$-local-minimizer, matches the corresponding deterministic rate of $O(1/\epsilon^{2})$. We next analyze Stochastic Cubic-Regularized Newton (SCRN) algorithm under interpolation-like conditions, and show that the oracle complexity to reach an $\epsilon$-local-minimizer under interpolation-like conditions, is $O(1/\epsilon^{2. 5})$. While this obtained complexity is better than the corresponding complexity of either PSGD, or SCRN without interpolation-like assumptions, it does not match the rate of $O(1/\epsilon^{1. 5})$ corresponding to deterministic Cubic-Regularized Newton method. It seems further Hessian-based interpolation-like assumptions are necessary to bridge this gap. We also discuss the corresponding improved complexities in the zeroth-order settings.

AAAI Conference 2020 Conference Paper

Suspicion-Free Adversarial Attacks on Clustering Algorithms

  • Anshuman Chhabra
  • Abhishek Roy
  • Prasant Mohapatra

Clustering algorithms are used in a large number of applications and play an important role in modern machine learning– yet, adversarial attacks on clustering algorithms seem to be broadly overlooked unlike supervised learning. In this paper, we seek to bridge this gap by proposing a black-box adversarial attack for clustering models for linearly separable clusters. Our attack works by perturbing a single sample close to the decision boundary, which leads to the misclustering of multiple unperturbed samples, named spill-over adversarial samples. We theoretically show the existence of such adversarial samples for the K-Means clustering. Our attack is especially strong as (1) we ensure the perturbed sample is not an outlier, hence not detectable, and (2) the exact metric used for clustering is not known to the attacker. We theoretically justify that the attack can indeed be successful without the knowledge of the true metric. We conclude by providing empirical results on a number of datasets, and clustering algorithms. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that generates spill-over adversarial samples without the knowledge of the true metric ensuring that the perturbed sample is not an outlier, and theoretically proves the above.

v2026.09.13